Abstract
I have the feeling that for many people the dialectic (insofar as it means anything at all) means an adjunct or supplementary kind of thinking: a method, or mode of interpretation, which is only intermittently appealed to, and somehow only occasionally added on to our normal thought processes. This means that not many people are capable of thinking dialectically all the time, and it may also mean that the dialectic is not a form of thought generated by this particular kind of society, for which positivism, empiricism, and various other anti-theoretical traditions seem more congenial and appropriate. (It is of course a dialectical thought as such to suppose that the various social formations — or more precisely, modes of production — secrete forms of thinking and abstraction that are specific to them and functional within their own particular structures: a presupposition that does something to the ‘truth’ of those various kinds of thinking that it would be best not to call relativistic, even though this dialectical or ‘absolute’ relativism certainly has its kinship with other progressive contemporary relativisms.)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aristotle. 1985. Metaphysics. In Complete Works, Vol. II. Princeton, NewJersey: Princeton University Press.
Barthes, Roland. 1957. Mythologies. Paris: Seuil.
Barthes, Roland. 1970. S/Z. Paris: Seuil.
Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Le Probleme de la genese dans la philosophie do Husserl. Paris: PUF.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1949. Pre-Prison Writings, ed. R. Mellamy, trans. V. Cox. London: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Jameson, Frederic. 1994. The Seeds of Time. New York: Columbia University Press.
Jameson, Frederic. 1998. Brecht and Method. London: Verso.
Lukács, Georg. 1971. History and Class Consciousness, trans. Rodney Livingston. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Marx, Karl. 1986. Grundrisse. In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Collected Works, Vols 28–29. New York: International Publishers.
Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. 1976. The Communist Manifesto. MECW, Vol. VI. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Ollman, Bertell. 1993. Dialectical Investigations. New York: Routledge.
Pietz, William. 1985. ‘The Problem of the Fetish’. RES, 9 (Spring).
Smith, Tony. 1990. The Logic of Marx’s Capital. New York: SUNY Press.
Zizek, Slavoj. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Fredric Jameson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jameson, F. (2008). Persistencies of the Dialectic: Three Sites. In: Ollman, B., Smith, T. (eds) Dialectics for the New Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583818_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583818_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35829-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58381-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)