Skip to main content

Abstract

The common, of course, was the land owned by everyone in the village. By the late middle ages, feudal lords were claiming this land as their own private property. In universities today, we can discern two opposing kinds of scholarship: that which studies the people who steal a goose from off the common (‘Goose From Off the Common Studies’, or G.F.C. for short) and that which studies those who steal the common from the goose (‘Common From the Goose Studies’, or C.F.G. for short). If the ‘mainstream’ in practically every discipline consists almost entirely of the former, Marxism is our leading example of the latter.

The law locks up the man or woman

Who steals a goose from off the common,

But leaves the greater the greater villain loose

Who steals the common from the goose.

Anonymous, 15th century, English

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bernstein, Eduard. 1961. Evolutionary Socialism, trans. Edith Harvey. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. L. R. 1992. The C. L. R James Reader, ed. Anna Grimshaw. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 1966. Reform or Revolution, trans. Integer. Colombo, Ceylon: Young Socialist Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. Reason and Revolution. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1904. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, trans. N. I. Stone. Chicago: Charles Kerr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1963. Theories of Surplus Value, Part 1, trans. Emile Bums. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1967. •Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society, ed. and trans. K. D. Easton and K. H. Guddat. Garden City, New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1973. Grundrisse, trans. Martin Nicolaus. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollman, Bertell. 1976. Alienation: Marx’s Conception of Man in Capitalist Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollman, Bertell. 1978. Social and Sexual Revolution: Essays on Marx and Reich. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollman, Bertell. 1993. Dialectical Investigations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, Maximilien. 1987. ‘Non-Market Socialism in the 20th Century’. In M. Rubel and J. Crump, eds, Non-Market Socialism in the 19th and 20th Centuries. London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik Olin. 1995. ‘Class Analysis and Historical Materialism’. Tape of talk at the New York Marxist School, February 23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Bertell Ollman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ollman, B. (2008). Why Dialectics? Why Now?. In: Ollman, B., Smith, T. (eds) Dialectics for the New Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583818_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics