Abstract
Ann Laura Stoler and Frederick Cooper have provided another reminder that one cannot simply ‘do’ colonial history. What constitutes the archive—what is included and what is excluded from it—reflects the cultural politics of colonialism itself.2 Nicholas B. Dirks has made a similar observation, describing the archive as a discursive formation that reflects the categories and operations of the colonial state.3 Few postcolonial historians or anthropologists would find these claims controversial now, but the question remains: if we accept them, how can historical research proceed, particularly the recovery of non-elite histories and experiences like those of subaltern women? Since the 1980s, scholars in the Subaltern Studies collective have been providing imaginative readings of colonial sources to trace the emergence of subaltern consciousness and experiences. The problem is, of course, that subalterns are far from autonomous social actors, but emerge from traces in the archives that define them in relation to elites.4 Perhaps for this reason, some post-colonial theorists, notably Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, question whether subaltern consciousness can be recovered at all. For Spivak, the best historians can do is to point to the silences in the archives, and trace the production of what she terms ‘the subaltern subject-effect’, for the subaltern is never produced in and through him or herself, but through the knotting together of particular, and contingent, historical strands.5
This research has been generously supported by the British Academy, British Academy Committee for South East Asian Studies, Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland, Economic and Social Research Council, and Faculty of the Social Sciences, University of Leicester. I would also like to thank Indrani Chatterjee,Anindita Ghosh, Durba Ghosh, and Anoma Pieris for constructive suggestions on the ideas presented here.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Nicholas B. Dirks, ‘The Crimes of Colonialism: Anthropology and the Textualization of India’, in Peter Pels and Oscar Salemink, eds, Colonial Subjects: Essays on the Practical History of Anthropology (Ann Arbor, 2000), p. 175.
Rosalind O’Hanlon, ‘Recovering the Subject: Subaltern Studies and Histories of Resistance in Colonial South Asia’, Modern Asian Studies, vol. 22 (1), 1988, pp. 189–224.
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, ‘Introduction; Subaltern Studies: Deconstructing Historiography’, in Ranajit Guha and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, eds, Selected Subaltern Studies (Oxford: 1998), pp. 12–13.
Rosalind O’Hanlon and David Washbrook, ‘After Orientalism: Culture, Criticism, and Politics in the Third World’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 34 (1), 1992, pp. 141–67.
Kamala Visweswaran, ‘Small Speeches, Subaltern Gender: Nationalist Ideology and Its Historiography’, in Shahid Amin and Dipesh Chakrabarty, eds, Subaltern Studies IX (Delhi: 1996), p. 88.
Anne McClintock, Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest (London: 1995), p. 5 (author’s emphasis).
Gyan Prakash, ‘Subaltern Studies as Postcolonial Criticism’, American Historical Review, vol. 99 (5), 1994, p. 1486.
Radhika Singha, A Despotism of Law: Crime and Justice in Early Colonial India (Delhi: 1998), p. 139.
Clare Anderson, Legible Bodies: Race, Criminality and Colonialism in Colonial South Asia (Oxford: 2004), ch. 3.
David Arnold, ‘The Colonial Prison: Power, Knowledge and Penology in Nineteenth-Century India’, in David Arnold and David Hardiman, eds, Subaltern Studies VIII (Delhi: 1994), pp. 150–2;
Anand A. Yang, ‘Disciplining “Natives”: Prisons and Prisoners in Early Nineteenth Century India’, South Asia, vol. 10 (2), 1987, pp. 29–45.
W.H. Marshall, Four Years in Burmah, Vol. II (London: 1860), pp. 169–71.
Satadru Sen, ‘Rationing Sex: Female Convicts in the Andamans’, South Asia, vol. 30 (1), 1999, pp. 35–6.
Marina Carter, Lakshmi’s Legacy: The Testimonies of Indian Women in 19rnCentury Mauritius (Rose-Hill, Mauritius: 1994).
C.J. Hawes, Poor Relations: The Making of a Eurasian Community in British India, 1773–1833 (Richmond: 1996).
James C. Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts (London: 1990).
Theodore Walrond, ed., Letters and Journals of James, Eighth Earl of Elgin; Governor of Jamaica, Governor-General of Canada, Envoy to China, Viceroy of India (London: 1872), p. 189 (Singapore, 6 June 1857).
John Furnivall, ‘The Fashioning of Leviathan’, Journal ofthe Burma Research Society, vol. 29 (1), 1939, p. 38.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Clare Anderson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anderson, C. (2008). Gender, Subalternity, and Silence: Recovering Convict Women’s Experiences From Histories of Transportation, c. 1780–1857. In: Ghosh, A. (eds) Behind the Veil. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583672_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583672_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36317-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58367-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)