Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

  • 271 Accesses

Abstract

Conflict resolution scholarship and practice is suffused with the influential modern and Western idea of sovereignty. The notion of an exclusive, accomplished, and self-sufficient entity—a self, or a territory circumscribing a group of people—and the accompanying right to exercise authority over this entity has been absorbed from mainstream social science scholarship and political thinking. Unfortunately, the idea of sovereignty has been subject to limited critical reflection or analysis in conflict resolution. Although sovereignty has come under some criticism,1 sovereign entities, either autonomous and discrete individuals or states, continue to be assumed as the primary agents for knowing the social and political world of conflict, and the key institutions for responding to conflict and (re-)ordering relations and geographical regions disrupted by conflict events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Thomas J. Biersteker and Cynthia Weber, State Sovereignty as Social Construct, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Richard Devetak, “Postmodernism,” in Theories of International Relations, Scott Burchill and Andrew Linklater (eds), Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 171–81.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilles Deleuze, Difference and Repetition, London: Athlone Press, 1994, p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adriana Cavarero, Relating Narratives: Storytelling and Selfhood, London and New York: Routledge, 2000, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sylviane Agacinski, “Another Experience of the Question, or Experiencing the Question Other-Wise,” in Who Comes after the Subject?, Peter Connor, Jean-Luc Nancy, and Eduardo Cadava (eds), New York; London: Routledge, 1991, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Phillip Darby, “Introduction,” in Postcolonizing the International: Working to Change the Way We Are, Phillip Darby (ed.), Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2006, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alphonso Lingis, The Community of Those Who Have Nothing in Common, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1994, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. William E. Connolly, The Augustinian Imperative: A Reflection on the Politics of Morality, Newbury Park: Sage, 1993, p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kenelm Burridge, Someone, No One: An Essay on Individuality, Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1979, pp. 11–13;

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, New York: Vintage, 1970, p. 378.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Emmanuel Levinas, “The Trace of the Other,” in Deconstruction in Context, Mark Taylor (ed.), Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. E. Young, Intercultural Communication: Pragmatics, Genealogy, Deconstruction, Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, 1996, p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meron Benvenisti, Conflicts and Contradictions, New York: Villard Books/ Random House, 1986, p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Romand Coles, Self/Power/Other: Political Theory and Dialogical Ethics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 128–9; Coles, Self/Power/Other: Political Theory and Dialogical Ethics, pp. 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Nicholas Abercrombie, Bryan S. Turner, and Stephen Hill, Sovereign Individuals of Capitalism, London; Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1986, pp. 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Slavoj Zizek, Eric L. Santner, and Kenneth Reinhard, The Neighbor: Three Inquiries in Political Theology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005, p. 5.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Walter J. Ong, Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word, London; New York: Methuen, 1982, p. 7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruno Latour, We Have Never Been Modern, Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984, p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mark Poster, Foucault, Marxism and History: Mode of Production Versus Mode of Information, Cambridge: Polity, 1984, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Emmanuel Levinas, Totality and Infinity, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1991, p. 21.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Emmanuel Levinas, Otherwise Than Being or Beyond Essence, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1991, pp. 23–4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. See also Jacques Derrida, “The Ends of Man,” in Margins of Philosophy, Jacques Derrida (ed.), Brighton, England: Harvester Press, 1982, especially pp. 124–5 for discussion of the relationship between the thinking of being, humanism, and subjectivity.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Saul Newman, “Politics of the Ego: Stirner’s Critique of Liberalism,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 5, no. 3, 2003, especially p. 14. See also Anthony J. Cascardi, The Subject of Modernity, Cambridge; Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1992, p. 58, pp. 70–1.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Michel Foucault, “The Birth of Biopolitics,” in Michel Foucault: Ethics, the Essential Works I, Paul Rabinow (ed.), London: Penguin, 1997, p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See Peter Adler, Karen Lovaas, and Neal Milner, “The Ideologies of Mediation: The Movement’s Own Story,” Law and Policy, vol. 10, no. 4, 1988, p. 334;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peter Fitzpatrick, “The Rise and Rise of Informalism,” in Informal Justice?, Roger Matthews (ed.), London: Sage, 1988, p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jay Rothman, From Confrontation to Cooperation, London: Sage, 1992, p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Walter Ullmann, The Individual and Society in the Middle Ages, London: Methuen, 1967, p. 7, passim.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Michael Dillon, “Sovereignty and Governmentality: From the Problematics of the ‘New World Order’ to the Ethical Problematic of the World Order,” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 20, 1995, p. 328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Eric L. Santner, On the Psychotheology of Everyday Life: Reflections on Freud and Rosenzweig, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2001, p. 50.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Oliver Ramsbotham, Tom Woodhouse, and Hugh Miall, Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts, Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity, 2005, p. 317.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Morgan Brigg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brigg, M. (2008). Sovereign Selves. In: The New Politics of Conflict Resolution. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583375_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics