Advertisement

Psychoanalysis, Transnationalism and National Habitus: A Comparative Approach to the Reception of Psychoanalysis in Argentina and Brazil (1910s–1940s)

  • Mariano Ben Plotkin
Part of the The Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series book series (PMSTH)

Abstract

Psychoanalysis is a clear example of a transnational system of thought. Since its creation in late imperial Vienna at the end of the nineteenth century, and particularly after World War II, the center of production and consumption of psychoanalysis has shifted, from continental Europe to the Anglo-Saxon world; and then in the 1960s, to the Latin world (France, but particularly Latin America). In the early 1940s Ernest Jones, then the president of the International Psychoanalytic Association (IPA), told members of the newly created Argentine Psychoanalytic Association that the German language was yielding its place to English as the official language of psychoanalysis. Today Spanish and French are probably the main languages in which psychoanalysis (particularly in its Lacanian version) is produced, discussed and practiced. This displacement from one continent to another and from one language to another had an impact not only on psychoanalysis as a body of thought and as a system of beliefs, but also on the different cultural spaces in which it took roots and developed.1

Keywords

Nineteenth Century National Identity Latin American Study Political Polarization Oedipus Complex 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    In recent years there has been an impressive production of scholarship on the diffusion of psychoanalysis in different countries. What follows is only a small sample of it. For the diffusion of psychoanalysis in France, see Elisabeth Roudinesco, La bataille de cent ans: L’histoire de la psychanalyse en France, 2 vols. (Paris: Seuil, 1986)Google Scholar
  2. and Sherry Turkle, Psychoanalytic Politics: Jacques Lacan and Freud’s French Revolution (2nd ed., London: Free Association Books, 1992);Google Scholar
  3. for Russia, Martin Miller, Freud and the Bolsheviks. Psychoanalysis in Imperial Russia and the Soviet Union (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998);Google Scholar
  4. and Alexander Etkind, Eros of the Impossible. The History of Psychoanalysis in Russia (Boulder: Westview, 1997);Google Scholar
  5. for the US, see Nathan G. Hale Jr, The Beginning of Psycho-analysis in the United States, 1876–1917 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1971); and The Rise and Crisis of Psychoanalysis in the United States, 1917–1985 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995);Google Scholar
  6. for Argentina, Mariano Plotkin, Freud in the Pampas. The Emergence and Development of a Psychoanalytic Culture in Argentina (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  7. For Australia, see Joy Damousi, Freud in the Antipode. A Cultural History of Psychoanalysis in Australia (Sydney: UNSW press, 2005).Google Scholar
  8. 2.
    Some authors make the distinction between “freudism” as the loose collection of discourses and practices inspired in Freud’s ideas and “psychoanalysis” as a more formalized therapeutic practice. I believe that this distinction in unnecessary. I prefer to use a broad definition of psychoanalysis. See Hugo Vezzetti, Aventuras de Freud en el país de los Argentinos (Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1996).Google Scholar
  9. 3.
    See Mariano Plotkin, “Tell Me Your Dreams: Psychoanalysis and Popular Culture in Buenos Aires, 1930–1950,” The Americas, 55: 4 (1999) 601–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 4.
    Elias derives his conception of “habitus” from psychoanalysis: “[Freud] attempted to show the connection between the outcome of the conflict-ridden channelling of drives in a person’s development and his or her resulting habitus.” Analogous connections could be established for societies. Although I am not sure about the fruitfulness of such analogies, I prefer the (historical ) concept of “national habitus” to the (a-historical and essentialist) idea of “national character.” See Norbert Elias, The Germans. Power Struggle and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (New York: Columbia U.P., 1996), p. 19 and passim.Google Scholar
  11. 6.
    Richard Morse, “The Multiverse of latin American Identity, c. 1920–c.1970,” In Bethell, Leslie (ed.), Ideas and Ideologies in Twentieth Century Latin America (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  12. 7.
    For a historical analysis of Argentine elites’s dycothomical view of the reality, see Maristella Svampa, El dilema argentino: civilización o barbarie. De Sarmiento al revisionismo peronista (Buenos Aires: El cielo por asalto, 1994).Google Scholar
  13. 8.
    On the evolution of ideas about immigration, see Halperin Donghi, Tulio, “¿Para qué la inmigración? Ideología y política inmigratoria en la Argentina (1810–1914),” Halperin Donghi (ed.), El espejo de la historia: problemas argentinos y perspectivas hispanoamericanas (Buenos Aires: Sudamericana, 1987).Google Scholar
  14. 9.
    Lilia Moritz Schwarcz notes that during the Brazilian monarchy a system of titles imported from Europe which included dukes, counts, viscounts, barons, and the like was mixed with indigenous names for those titles. Thus, there was a Viscount of Pirajá; a Viscountess of Tibají; a Baron of Bujurú., etc. See Moritz Schwarcz, Lilia, As barbas do Imperador. D. Pedro II, um monarca nos trópicos (São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1998).Google Scholar
  15. 10.
    Until the abolition of the slave trade Brazil received more black slaves than any other country in the Americas. On the paradoxical place of liberalism in nineteenth century Brazilian elites’ thought, see Roberto Schwarz, “Las ideas fuera de lugar,” In Adriana Amante and Florencia Garramuño, (eds.), Absurdo Brasil. Polémicas en la cultura brasileña (Buenos Aires: Biblos, 2000).Google Scholar
  16. 11.
    Nineteenth century romantic writers exhalted and idealized the “indian” as a national symbol. Moreover, other writers and critics such as Silvio Romero or Araripe Junior found in “mestizaje” (miscegenation) the origins of Brazilian literature. Later, at the turn of the century, in his enormously popular work Os Sertões (1902), Euclydes da Cunha found the bedrock of Brazilian nationality in the mestizo population from the sertão. However, the hegemonic point of view among Brazilian intellectuals held that the whitening of the population was at the same time a precondition and a consequence of modernization. For a discussion on race in literature, see, Roberto Ventura, Estilo tropical. História cultural e polêmicas literárias no Brasil (São Paulo: Companhia das letras, 1991).Google Scholar
  17. 12.
    See Thomas Skidmore, Black into White. Race and Nationality in Brazilian Thought (2nd ed., Durham: Duke University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 13.
    See Emilia Viotti da Cosa, “The Myth of Brazilian Racial Democracy,” in Viotti da Costa (ed.), The Brazilian Empire, Myths and History (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  19. 15.
    On the impact of positivism in Latin America, see Hale, Charles, “Political and Social Ideas,” In Bethell, Leslie (ed.), Latin America: Economy and Society, 1870–1930 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989). In Brazil, Comtean positivism became, during the early years of the republic, almost a civic religion.Google Scholar
  20. 16.
    Nathan G. Hale, Freud and the Americans. The Beginnings of Psychoanalysis in the United States, 1876–1917 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995 [1st ed 1971]), Chapters III and IV.Google Scholar
  21. 17.
    Skidmore, Black; Daim Borges, “Puffy, Ugly, Slothful and Inert: Degeneration in Brazilian Social Thought,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 25: 2 (May 1993) 235–256;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. See Kristin Ruggiero, Modernity in the Flesh. Medicine, law and Society in Turn-of-the-Century Argentina (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
  23. 18.
    The image of the (particularly) Italian immigrant as the seed of degeneracy was present in naturalist fiction. See Gabriela Nouzeilles, Ficciones somáticas. Naturalismo, nacionalismo y políticas médicas del cuerpo (Argentina 1880–1910) (Rosario: Beatriz Viterbo, 2000).Google Scholar
  24. 19.
    Moreira-Almeida, Alexander, Silva de Almeida, Angélica and Lotufo Neto, Francisco, “History of ‘Spiritist Madness’ in Brazil,” History of Psychiatry, 16: 1 (2005) 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 21.
    Germán Greve, “Sobre psicología y psicoterapia de ciertos estados angustiosos,” reproduced In Vezzetti, Hugo (ed.), Freud en Buenos Aires, 1910–1939 (Buenos Aires: Puntosur, 1989), p. 90.Google Scholar
  26. 22.
    See Hugo Vezzetti, Aventuras de Freud en el país de los argentinos. de José Ingenieros a Enrique Pichon Rivière (Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1996), pp. 15–18.Google Scholar
  27. 23.
    Raitzin, Alejandro, “La locura y los sueños,” Revista de Criminología, Psiquiatría y Medicina Legal, 6 (1919), 25–54.Google Scholar
  28. 24.
    Francisco Franco da Rocha, O pansexualismo na doutrina de Freud (São Paulo, Typographia Brasil de Rotschild, 1920).Google Scholar
  29. 25.
    See Montechi Valladares de Oliveira, Carmen Lucia., “L’implantation du mouvement psychanalytique à São Paulo” (PhD. Diss, Université Paris 7, 2001), p. 93.Google Scholar
  30. 26.
    Jane Russo, “A Psicanálise no Brasil-Institucionalizacão e Difusão entre o Público Leigo” Paper delivered at the 2006 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association in Puerto Rico (March 15–18, 2006).Google Scholar
  31. See also Ana Teresa Venancio and Lázara Carvalhal, “Juliano Moreira: a psiquiatria científica no processo civilizador brasileiro,” In, Dias Duarte, Luiz Fernando; Russo, Jane and Venancio, Ana Teresa (eds.), Psicologizacão no Brasil. Atores e autores (Rio de Janeiro: Contra Capa Livraria, 2005).Google Scholar
  32. 28.
    However, social thinkers did approach psychoanalysis during the 1960s. See Jorge Balan, Cuéntame tu vida. Una biografíia colectiva del psicoanálisis en la Argentina (Buenos Aires: Planeta, 1991).Google Scholar
  33. For Peronism and culture, see Mariano Plotkin, Manana es San Peron. A Cultural History of Peron’s Argentina (Wielmington: Scholarly Resources, 2003). Later, in the 1970s and 1980s the diffusion of the doctrines of Jacques Lacan opened a new space for the interaction between analysits and intellectuals. See also Plotkin, Freud in the Pampas.Google Scholar
  34. 29.
    Russo, Jane, “A difusão da psicanálise no Brasil na primeira metade do século XX-Da vanguarda modernista à radio-novela” Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, 2: 1 (2002), 53–64.Google Scholar
  35. 30.
    Buarque de Holanda, Sergio, Raizes do Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: José Olympo, 1936).Google Scholar
  36. 31.
    Freyre, Gilberto, Casa grande & senzala. Formação da família brasileira sob o regime de economia patriarcal (Rio de Janeiro: Maia & Schmidt, 1993).Google Scholar
  37. 32.
    Jane Russo, “A Difusão da Psicanálise no Brasil na Primeira Metade do Século XX-Da Vanguarda Modernista à Radio-Novela,” Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, 2: 1 (2002), 53–64.Google Scholar
  38. 33.
    Ramos, Artur, O negro brasileiro (Recife: Massangana, 1988 [1st ed. 1934]), cit by Alexandre Schreiner, “Uma aventura para amanhã. Artur Ramos e a neurohigiene infantil na década de 1930,” In Dias Duarte, Russo and Venancio (orgs.), Psicologizacão, p. 157.Google Scholar
  39. 35.
    Porto-Carrero considered that abortion should be permitted (after a technical commission reviewed each cases) for six reasons: (a) therapeutic; (b) prophilactic; (c) eugenic; (d) moral; (e) aesthetic (in the case of women for whom, like dancers such as Isadora Duncan, the aesthetic of their body constitute the basis of their contribution to society); and (f) professional (women who make a crucial contribution to society and whose pregnancy and motherhood would impair them to fulfill their professional role, such as scientists). He also promoted birth control. See, Porto-Carrero, Júlio Pires, Psicanalise de uma civilizacão (Rio de Janeiro: Editora Guanabara, 1935), p. 164 and ff. See also Russo, Jane, “Júlio Porto-Carrero: a psicanálise como instrumento civilizador,” In Dias Duarte, Russo and Venancio (orgs.), Psicologizacao.Google Scholar
  40. 37.
    Elisabete Mokrejs, A Psicanálise no Brasil. As Origens do Pensamento Psicanalítico (Petrópolis: Vozes, 1993), ch. 4.Google Scholar
  41. 38.
    Porto-Carrero, Júlio P., “Coneito Psychanalytico da pena,” In Porto-Carrero (ed.), Ensaios de Psychanalyse (Rio de Janeiro: Flores y Mano, 1929), p. 185.Google Scholar
  42. 39.
    Porto-Carrero, Júlio, Criminologia e psicanálise (Rio de Janeiro: Flores & Mano, 1932), p. 63, cited in Russo, “Júlio Porto-Carrero,” p. 135.Google Scholar
  43. 40.
    For a comparison between Perón’s and Vargas’s relationship with intellectuals, see Fiorucci, Flavia, “¿Aliados o enemigos? Los intelectuales en los gobiernos de Vargas y Perón” en Rein, Raanan y Rosalie Sitman (comps.), El primer peronismo. De regreso a los comienzos (Buenos Aires: Lumiere, 2005).Google Scholar
  44. 41.
    On Brazilian intellectuals, see Miceli, Sergio, Intelectuais e classe dirigente no Brasil (1920–1945) (São Paulo: DIFEL, 1979);Google Scholar
  45. and Pécaut, Daniel, Entre le peuple et la nation: Les intellectuels et la politique au Brésil (Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, 1989).Google Scholar
  46. 43.
    However, it should be noted that Modernism was far from a unified movement and developed strong regional and ideological overtones. For an overview, see Cándido, Antonio and Castello, José Aderaldo, Presenca da literatura brasileira. Modernismo/História e antologia (Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2001).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Florencia Garramuño, Modernidades primitivas. Tango, samba y nación (Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2007).Google Scholar
  48. 50.
    Cristiana Facchinetti, “Deglutindo Freud: Histórias da digestão do discurso psicanalítico no Brasil” (Ph.D diss. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 2001).Google Scholar
  49. 53.
    See Marialzira Perestrello, “Primeiros econtros com a psicanálise. Os precursores no Brasil (1899–1937),” In Figueira, Sérvulo (ed.), Efeito Psi (Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1988); and Sagawa, Roberto Yutaka, “A psicanálise.” Marcondes himself had published literary texts in the modernista magazine Klaxon.Google Scholar
  50. 55.
    For a perceptive analysis of Martin Fierro, see Sarlo, Beatriz, Una modernidad periférica: Buenos Aires 1920 y 1930 (Buenos Aires: Nueva Visibn, 1988), ch. 4,Google Scholar
  51. and Sarlo, Beatriz and Carlos Altamirano, “Vanguardia y criollismo: la aventura de Martin Fierro” in Sarlo and Altamirano, Ensayos argentinos. De Sarmiento a la vanguardia (Buenos Aires: 1997), pp. 211–260.Google Scholar
  52. 57.
    See Jorge Schwatz, Vanguarda e cosmopolitismo na década de 20. Oliverio Girondo e Oswald de Andrade (São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva, 1983), pp. 132–133, 143. Girondo was a conspicuous member of the Martin Fierro group: he wrote theGoogle Scholar
  53. 60.
    Text by Roberto Mariani included in Vignale, Pedro Juan and Tiempo, César, Exposiciôn de la actual poesia argentina (Buenos Aires: Minerva, 1927), cit. by Prieto, Adolfo, “Roberto Arlt: Los siete locos. Los lanzallamas,” In Arlt, Roberto, Los siete locos. Los lanzallamas (Caracas: Biblioteca Ayacucho, 1978), p. XVI.Google Scholar
  54. 61.
    See, Beatriz Sarlo, La imaginación técnica. Suenos modernos de la cultura argentina (Buenos Aires: Nueva Visiön, 1992).Google Scholar
  55. 64.
    Florestan Fernandes, “Desenvolvimento histórico-social da sociologia no Brasil” in Fernandes, A sociologia no Brasil. Contribução para o estudo de sua formação e desenvolvimento (Petrôpolis: Voces, 1977), p. 35 and ff.Google Scholar
  56. 66.
    Roger Bastide, “Matériaux pour une sociologie du rêve” in Revue Internationale de Sociologie 41: 11–12 (1933). An excellent analysis of Bastide’s intellectual trajectory can be found in Peixoto,Google Scholar
  57. Fernanda Arêas, Diálogos Brasileiros. Uma análise da obra de Roger Bastide (São Paulo: Edusp, 2000).Google Scholar
  58. 67.
    Originally published in 1941, in a book that bears the same title, it was reproduced in Bastide, Sociologia do folclore brasileiro (Sao Paulo: Anhambi, 1959).Google Scholar
  59. 69.
    Roger Bastide, Sociologie et psychanalyse (Paris: PUF, 1950). Bastide mentions in the prologue that the book originated in the interest that his Brazilian students had shown for psychoanalysis back in the 1930s.Google Scholar
  60. 72.
    Dias Duarte, “Em busca do castelo interior. Roger Bastide e a psicologizaçáo do Brasil,” In Dias Duarte, Russo and Venancio (eds.), Psicologização (Rio de Janeiro: Contra Capa Livraria, 2005), pp. 167–182.Google Scholar
  61. 73.
    See Neiburg, Federico, Los intelectuales y la invención del peronismo. Estudios de antropologia social y cultural (Buenos Aires: Alianza, 1998).Google Scholar
  62. 76.
    Gino Germani, “Prefacio a la edición castellana,” Erich Fromm, El miedo a la libertad (Buenos Aires: Paidös, 1947), pp. 9–11,Google Scholar
  63. cit by Alejandro Blanco, Razón y modernidad. Gino Germani y la sociologla Argentina (Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, 2006), p. 127. My discussion on Germani is mostly based on this work and on other papers by Blanco:Google Scholar
  64. Alejandro Blanco, “Gino Germani: las ciencias del hombre y el proyecto de una voluntad politica ilustrada,” Punto de Vista 62 (Dic. 1998) 25–38;Google Scholar
  65. Hugo Vezzetti, “Las ciencias sociales y el campo de la salud mental en la década del sesenta,” Punto de Vista, 54 (April 1995) 29–33.Google Scholar
  66. On Germani, see Alejandro Blanco, “La sociologia: Una profesión en disputa,” In Federico Neiburg and Mariano Plotkin (eds), Intelectuales y expertos. La constitución del conocimiento social en la Argentina (Buenos Aires: Paidós, 2004);Google Scholar
  67. Ana Alejandra Germani, Gino Germani, del anti fascismo a la sociologia (Buenos Aires: Taurus, 2004).Google Scholar
  68. 78.
    See Gino Germani, “Psicoanálisis y sociologia: un problema de método” originally published as an introduction to the Spanish translation of Psicologia y sociologia by Walter Hollitscher (Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1951),Google Scholar
  69. reproduced in Alejandro Blanco (ed.), Gino Germani: La renovación intelectual de la sociologia (Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2007), p. 124.Google Scholar
  70. 79.
    See, for instance, Gino Germani, “El psicoanálisis y las ciencias del hombre” in Revista de la Universidad, La Plata, 3 (1956); and Germani, “Sociologia, relaciones humanas y psiquiatria,” Revista de la Universidad de Buenos Aires 1: 1 (1956) 139–144; Germani, “Psicoanálisis.”Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mariano Ben Plotkin 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariano Ben Plotkin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations