Skip to main content

Abstract

The elimination of poverty has been and continues to be one of the primary aims of economic policy in a large number of countries. Therefore, the targeting of poverty alleviation is still a very important issue in many countries. It is thus necessary to know the dimension of poverty and the process through which it seems to be aggravated. One natural question that arises in this context is: how do we quantify the extent of poverty?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aczel, J., F. S. Roberts and Z. Rosenbaum (1986) ‘On Scientific Laws without Dimensional Constraints’, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 199, 389–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S. (1997): ‘Aspects of Poverty in Malaysia’, Review of Income and Wealth, 23, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. and F. Bourguignon (1982) ‘The Comparison of Multidimensioned Distributions of Economic Status’, Review of Economic Studies, 49, 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby C. and D. Donaldson (1980): ‘Ethical Indices for the Measurement of Poverty’, Econometrica 58, 1053–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F. and S.R. Chakravarty (1999): ‘A Family of Multidimensional Poverty Measures’, in D.J. Slottjee (ed.), Advances in Econometrics, Income Distribution and Scientific Methodology: Essays in Honor of C. Dagum. Berlin. Physica Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F. and S.R. Chakravarty (2002) ‘Multidimensional Poverty Orderings’, Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F. and G. Fields (1997): ‘Discontinuous Losses from Poverty, Generalized Pα Measures and Optimal Transfers to the Poor’, Journal of Public Economics, 63, 155–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R. (1983a): ‘A New Index of Poverty’, Mathematical Social Sciences, 6, 307–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R. (1983b): ‘Ethically Flexible Measures of Poverty’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 16, 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R. (1990) Ethical Social Index Numbers. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R. (1997): ‘On Shorrocks’ Reinvestigation of the Sen Poverty Index’, Econometrica, 65, 1241–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R., D. Mukherjee and R. Ranade (1998): ‘On the Family of Subgroup and Factor Decomposable Measures of Multidimensional Poverty’, Research on Economic Inequality, 8, 175–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R., R. Kanbur and D. Mukherjee (2006) ‘Population Growth and Poverty Measurement’ Social Choice and Welfare, 26, 471–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S., R. Hamming and D. Ulph (1981): ‘On Indices for the Measurement of Poverty’, Economic Journal, 91, 515–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell F.A. (1988): ‘Poverty Measures, Inequality and Decomposability’, in D. Bos, M. Rose and C. Seidl (eds), Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, J. and J. Silber, (2005) ‘Measuring Multidimensional Poverty: An Empirical Comparison of Various Approaches’, Review of Income and Wealth, 51, 145–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, D. and J.A. Weymark (1986) ‘Properties of Fixed-population Poverty Indices’, International Economic Review, 27, 667–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, J.-Y., D. Sahn and S. Younger (2004) ‘Robust Multidimensional Poverty Comparisons’, CIRPEE Working Paper No. 03–04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J.E., J. Greer. and E. Thorbecke (1984) ‘A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures’, Econometrica, 42, 761–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J.E. and A.F. Shorrocks (1991) ‘Subgroup Consistent Poverty Indices’, Econometrica, 59, 687–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, A. (1987) ‘A Class of Poverty Indices’, International Economic Review, 28, 583–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human Development Report (2005) Statistics. Website http://hdr.undp.org/statistics/data/indicators.cfm?alpha=yes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N.C. (1980) ‘On a Class of Poverty Measures’, Econometrica, 48, 437–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S.C. (1977): ‘Mulditimensional Egalitarianisms’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, A. and T.E. Smith (1982) ‘An Impossibility Theorem on Poverty Indices’, International Economic Review, 24, 423–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. and M. Ravallion (1995) ‘Poverty and Policy’, in J.Behrman and T.N. Srinivasan (eds), Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 3. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (1996) ‘Issues in Measuring and Modeling Poverty’, Economic Journal, 106, 1328–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1976) ‘Poverty: an Ordinal approach to Measurement’, Econometrica, 44, 219–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1981) Poverty and Famines. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1985) Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1992) Inequality Re-examined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, A.F. (1995) ‘Revisiting the Sen Poverty Index’, Econometrica, 63, 1225–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeten, P. (1981) First Things First: Meeting Basic Human Needs in Developing Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, S. (2002) ‘Counting the Poor: an Elementary Difficulty in the Measurement of Poverty’, Economics and Philosophy, 18, 277–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takayama, N. (1979) ‘Poverty Income inequality and Their Measures: Professor Sen’s Axiomatic Approach Reconsidered’, Econometrica, 47, 749–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, K.Y. (2002) ‘Multidimensional Poverty Indices’, Social Choice and Welfare, 19, 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (1997) Human Development Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, H. (1968) ‘An Economic Definition of Poverty,’ in D.P. Moynihan (ed.), On Understanding Poverty. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, B. (1993) ‘An Axiomatic Characterization of the Watts Poverty Measure, Economics Letters, 42, 81–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, B.Y. (1997) ‘Aggregate Poverty Measures’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 11, 123–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chakravarty, S.R., Silber, J. (2008). Measuring Multidimensional Poverty: The Axiomatic Approach. In: Kakwani, N., Silber, J. (eds) Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582354_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics