Abstract
In this chapter we consider the role played by the government in promoting policies which challenge discrimination. Early theorising on the state, including its welfare arm, tended to portray it as patriarchal and imperialist and, above all, capitalist. It was seen first and foremost to serve the interests of ‘Big Business’ and to help it exploit women and racialised minorities by using them as cheap sources of labour. The British state was described as patriarchal by feminists in the decades after the war, in that its security policy was predicated upon a view of the family which saw men as breadwinners and women as dependants, thus reinforcing male power and authority in the family (Barrett 1980; Wilson 1977). Other feminists also pointed to the failure of the British state to protect women from domestic violence and rape (Edwards 1981; Smart 1984). Amina Mama (1984), in a powerful critique of the British state’s approach to black women, pointed to the way the state tended to pathologise black families and present black women’s fertility as a threat, leading to attempts to limit their reproductive capacities through the use of contraceptives such as Depo-provera.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2008 Harriet Bradley and Geraldine Healy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bradley, H., Healy, G. (2008). Challenging Discrimination, Sexism and Racism: the Role of the State. In: Ethnicity and Gender at Work. The Future of Work Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582101_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582101_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54322-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58210-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)