Abstract
In this chapter I would like to analyze the implications of the concept of multiple identities from the point of view of paradigms of social and cultural change, especially the evolutionary one. The notion of ‘multiple modernities’ denotes a certain view of the contemporary world — indeed of the history and characteristics of the modern era — that goes against the view long prevalent in scholarly and general discourse (Eisenstadt, 2000, 2002a, 2002b; Roniger and Waisman, 2002). It goes against the view of the ‘classical’ theories of modernization and of the convergence of industrial societies prevalent in the 1950s, and indeed against the classical sociological analyses of Marx, Durkheim, and (to a large extent) even of Weber, at least in one reading of his work. They all assumed, even if only implicitly, that the cultural program of modernity as it developed in modern Europe and the basic institutional constellations that emerged there would ultimately take over in all modern izing and modern societies; with the expansion of modernity, they would prevail throughout the world (Eisenstadt, 2002a).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Berger, Suzanne & Richard Dore. (1996) National Diversity and Global Capitalism.. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Eisenstadt, S.N. (1952) ‘The axial age: the emergence of transcendental visions and the rise of clerics’. European Journal of Sociology. 23 (2) 294–314.
Eisenstadt, S.N. (1963) The Political Systems of Empires. New York: Free Press.
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (1986) The Origins and Diversity of Axial-Age Civilizations. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (1992) ‘Frameworks of the great revolutions: culture, social structure, history and human agency’. International Social Science Journal. 44 (385–401).
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (1995) ‘Social division of labor, construction of centers and institutional dynamics: a reassessment of the structural-evolutionary perspective’. Proto-Soziologie 7. (11–22).
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (1996) Japanese Civilization: A Comparative View. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (1999a) Fundamentalism, Sectarianism and Revolution: The Jacobin Dimension of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (1999b) Paradoxes of Democracy: Fragilit.’ Continuity and Change. Washington, DC: The Woodrow Wilson Center.
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (2000) ‘The reconstruction of religious arenas in the framework of “multiple modernities”’. Millenium: Journal of International Studies. 29 (3) 591–611.
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (2001) ‘The civilizational dimension of modernity: modernity as a distinct civi lization’. International Sociology. 16 (3) 320–40.
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (2002a) Multiple Modernities. New Brunswick: Transaction Publications.
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (2002b) ‘The first multiple modernities: collective identities, public spheres and political order in the Americas’. In: Roniger, Luis & Carlos H. Waisman eds. Globality and Multiple Modernities: Comparative North American and Latin American Perspectives.. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (2002c) ‘The civilizations of the Americas: the crystallizations of distinct modernities’. Comparative Sociology. 1 (1) 43–61.
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (2002d) ‘Cultural programs, the construction of collective identity and the continual reconstruction of primordiality’. In: Malesevic, Sinisa & Mark Haugaard eds. Making Sense of Collectivity: Ethnicit. ’ Nationalism and Globalization. London: Pluto 33–38.
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (2003a) ‘The puzzle of Indian democracy’. In: Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers 801–31.
Eisenstadt, S.N ed. (2003b) ‘Civil society and public sphere: the myth of oriental despotism and political dynamics in Islamic societies’. In: Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers 399–435.
Eisenstadt, S.N. & B. Giesen. (1995) ‘The construction of collective identity’. European Journal of Sociology. 36 (1) 72–102.
Eisenstadt, S.N., Wolfgang Schluchter & Bjorn Wittrock eds. (2001) Public Spheres and Collective Identitites. New Brunswick: Transaction 105–32.
Faubion, James D. (1993) Modern Greek Lessons. A Primer in Historical Constructivism.. Princeton: Princeton Universtiy Press 113–15.
Hartz, L. (1964) The Founding of New Societites. New York: Brace and World.
Inkeles, A. & D.H. Smith. (1974) Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Developing Countries. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Kolakowski, L. (1990) Modernity on Endless Trial. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lefort, C. (1988) Democracy and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lerner, D. (1958) The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East.. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
Mann, Michael. (2001) ‘Globalization and September 11’. New Left Review. 12 (Nov.-Dee.) 51–72.
Parsons, Talcott. (1977) The Evolution of Societies. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Roniger, Luis & Carlos H. Waisman eds. (2002) Globality and Multiple Modernities: Comparative North American and Latin American Perspectives. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.
Roniger, Luis & Mario Sznajder eds. (1998) Constructing Collective Identities and Shaping Public Spheres: Latin American Paths. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.
Shils, E. (1975) ‘Primordial, personal, sacred and civil ties’. In: Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 111–26.
Sombart, W. (1976) Why Is There No Socialism in the United States. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Tiryakian, E. (1985) ‘The changing centers of modernity’. In: E. Cohen, M. Lissak & U. Almagor eds. Comparative Social Dynamics: Essays in Honor of S.N. Eisenstadt.. Boulder, CO and London: Westview 131–47.
Tiryakian, E. (1994) ‘The New Worlds and sociology — an overview’. International Sociology. 9 (2) June 131–48.
Wimmer, A. (2001) ‘Globalizations avant la lettre: a comparative view of isomorphization and heteromorphization in an inter-connecting world’. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 43 (3) July 435–66.
Wimmer, A. (2002) Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflict: Shadows of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Samuel N. Eisenstadt
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eisenstadt, S.N. (2006). Multiple Modernities in the Framework of a Comparative Evolutionary Perspective. In: Wimmer, A., Kössler, R. (eds) Understanding Change. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524644_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524644_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51991-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52464-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)