Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Advances ((PAD))

Abstract

‘Spencer is ruined’ remarked John Weever in 1599 in an epigram lamenting the poet’s death. The full text was quoted by H. S. V. Jones in 1930 in A Spenser Handbook in the short chapter entitled ‘Complaints’ (74):

Colin’s gone home, the glorie of his clime, The Muses Mirrour, and the Shepheards Saint; Spencer is ruined, of our latter time The fairest mine, Faëries foulest want: Then his Time-ruines did our ruine show, Which by his ruine we untimely know: Spencer therfore thy Ruines were cal’d in, Too soone to sorrow least we should begin.

Jones’s purpose in quoting Weever is indicative of the prevailing critical concerns of the day, concems that were heavily informed by the historicist methodology of Edwin Greenlaw’s Studies in Spenser’s Historical Allegory (1932) and the bibliographical and generic suppositions of Harold Stein’s Studies in Spenser’s Complaints (1934)—the latter being the first, and by 1947 still the only, monograph wholly devoted to the Complaints (Radcliffe 1996, 163–8).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Bernard, J. D. 1989. Ceremonies of Innocence: Pastoralism in the Poetry of Edmund Spenser, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. D. 1999. ‘The New Poet’: Novelty and Tradition in Spenser’s Complaints, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, D. ‘Spenser’s Fortieth Birthday and Related Fictions’, SSt 4 (1984 for 1983), 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, P. 1993. Spenser’s Famous Flight: A Renaissance Idea of a Literary Career, Toronto: University of Toronto P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, D. 1990. Spenser’s ‘Amorett’: A Critical Study, Brookfield: Scolar P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hieatt, A. K. 1960. Short Time’s Endless Monument, Port Washington NY: Kennikat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, N. J. 1977. Spenser’s Pastorals: ‘The Shepheardes CalenderandColin Clout’, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. C. 1990. Spenser’s ‘Amoretti’: Analogies of Love, Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, D. 1990. Melodious Tears: The English Funeral Elegy from Spenser to Milton, Oxford: Clarendon P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, J. F. 1986. ‘Echo’s Ring: Orpheus and Spenser’s Career’, ELR 16: 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, J. H. 1989. Critical Contexts of Sidney’sAstrophil and Stellaand Spenser’s ‘Amoretti’, Victoria, BC: English Literary Studies, University of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, R. A. 1993. ‘Edmund Spenser: Poet of Exile’, 1991 Lectures and Memoirs, Proceedings of the British Academy, 80: 73–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. Spenser’s Monstrous Regiment: Elizabethan Ireland and the Poetics of Difference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigman, G. W. 1985. III, Grief and English Renaissance Elegy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C. J. 1981. ‘“How Weak Be the Passions of Woefulness”: Spenser’s Ruines of Time’, SSt 2: 159–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, D. R. 1985. Spenser and the Poetics of Pastoral: A Study of the World of Colin Clout, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. 1961. ‘The Use of Conventions in Spenser’s Minor Poems’, in W. Nelson, ed., Form and Convention in the Poetry of Edmund Spenser, New York: Columbia University Press, 122–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H. 1934. Studies in Spenser’s ‘Complaints’, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Richard A. McCabe

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCabe, R.A. (2006). Shorter Verse Published 1590–95. In: van Es, B. (eds) A Critical Companion to Spenser Studies. Palgrave Advances. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524569_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics