Advertisement

Monopsony and Employment Inflows. A Microeconometric Analysis Based on a Panel of Belgian Firms

Chapter
  • 86 Downloads
Part of the Applied Econometrics Association Series book series (AEAS)

Abstract

It is often asserted among economists that regulation prevents wage adjustment process towards equilibrium by pushing wages above their equilibrium level. Therefore, a way to get rid of unemployment is to deregulate the market, leading to a perfect competition state with no unvoluntary unemployment and each worker being paid a wage equal to his marginal productivity. The basic reason for some economists to consider that deregulation could succeed often comes from the idea that a main cause to unemployment, from an unperfect competition point of view, is related to union bargaining power (Lindbeck and Snower, 1989). Deregulation could reduce this power through reforming the social security or the employment protection systems, abandoning or reducing minimum wages.

Keywords

Labour Market Labour Force Minimum Wage Exploitation Rate Marginal Productivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allaart, P. (2002) ‘Wage Differentials Between and Within Establishments: An Eclectic Approach’, Proceedings of the 79th International Applied Econometrics Association, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  2. Belgian Economic Central Council (2001) ‘Construction 2000–2001: de l’optimisme à la prudence’, Lettre socio-économique, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  3. Belgian Economic Central Council (2002) ‘L’emploi dans le secteur Horeca: aspects quantitatifs et qualitatifs’, Rapport de la Commission Horeca, p. 11.Google Scholar
  4. Blanchflower, D. and Freeman, R. (1994) ‘Did the Thatcher Reforms Change British Labour Performance?’, in Barrell, R. (ed.), The UK Labour Market: Comparative Aspects and Institutional Developments, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–72.Google Scholar
  5. Blundell, R. (1993) ‘Offre de travail et fiscalité: une revue de la littérature’, Economie et Prévision, 108(2), pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blundell, R. and McCurdy, T. (1999) ‘Labor Supply: A Review of Alternative Approaches’, in Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D. (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics, Elsevier Science Publisher, 3A, chapter 27, pp. 1559–695.Google Scholar
  7. Boadway R. and Cuff, K. (2001) ‘A Minimum Wage can be Welfare-improving and Employment-enhancing’, European Economic Review, 45(3), pp. 553–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boal, W. (1995) ‘Testing for Employer Monopsony in Turn-of-the-Century Coal Mining’, Rand Journal of Economy, 26(3), pp. 519–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boal, W. and Ransom, M. (1997) ‘Monopsony in the Labor Market’, The Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), pp. 86–112.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, R. (1993) ‘An Estimate of the Rent Generated by a Premium College Football Player’, Economic Inquiry, 31(4), pp. 671–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burdett, K. and Mortensen, D. (1998) ‘Wage Differentials, Employer Size, and Unemployment’, International Economic Review, 39(2), pp. 257–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cahuc, P. and Zylberberg, A. (2001) Le marché du travail, De Boeck Université, p. 714.Google Scholar
  13. Dolado, J., Kramarz, F., Machin, S., Manning, A., Margolis, D. and Teulings, C. (1996) ‘The Economic Impact of Minimum Wages in Europe’, Economic Policy, 23, pp. 317–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gregg, P. and Manning, A. (1997) ‘Labour Market Regulation and Unemployment’, in Snower, D. and de la Dehesa, G. (eds) Unemployment Policy: Government Options for the Labour Market, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 395–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Le Dortz, L. and Perrochon, D. (2001) ‘Stratégies des fusions-acquisitions 2000 dans la chimie et la pharmacie: un secteur qui se réinvente’, Centre Français du Commerce Extérieur, Paris, p. 75.Google Scholar
  16. Lindbeck, A. and Snower, DJ. (1989) ‘The Insider-Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment’, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 285.Google Scholar
  17. Luizer, J. and Thornton, R. (1986) ‘Concentration in the Local Labor Market for Public School Teachers’, Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 39(4), pp. 573–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Manning, A. (1995) ‘How do we Know that Real Wages are too High?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), pp. 1111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manning, A. (2001) ‘A Generalised Model of Monopsony’, Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Papers, 499, p. 21.Google Scholar
  20. Masters, A. (1999) ‘Wage Posting in Two-sided Search and the Minimum Wage’, International Economic Review, 40(4), pp. 809–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ransom, M. (1993) ‘Seniority and Monopsony in the Labor Market’, American Economic Review, 83(1), pp. 221–33.Google Scholar
  22. Rebitzer, J. and Taylor, L. (1995) ‘The Consequences of Minimum Wage Laws, Some New Theoretical Ideas’, Journal of Public Economics, 56(2), pp. 245–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robinson, J. (1969) The Economics of Imperfect Competition, 2nd edition, London: Macmillan, p. 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scully, G.W. (1974) ‘Pay and Performance in Major League BaseBall’, American Economic Review, 64(6), pp. 915–30.Google Scholar
  25. Siotis, G. (2000) ‘Market Power, Total Factor Productivity Growth, and Structural Change. An Illustration for Spain, 1983–1996’, Banco de España, Servicio de Estudios, Documento de Trabajo, no. 0001, pp. 7–45.Google Scholar
  26. Zimbalist, A. (1992) ‘Salaries and Performance: Beyond the Scully Model’, in Sommers, M.D. (ed.) Diamonds are Forever: The Business of Baseball, Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 109–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Applied Econometrics Association 2004

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations