Low Pay, Higher Pay, Earnings Mobility and Job Satisfaction in Britain

Part of the Applied Econometrics Association Series book series (AEAS)


Public policy concern about the position of the low paid worker has grown in the United Kingdom as earnings inequality has risen to unprecedentedly high levels and this has been reflected in the introduction of minimum wage legislation with a statutory minimum set initially at £3.60 per hour for adults in April 1999, raised to £4.10 per hour in October 2001, and further increased to £4.20 per hour in October 2002.1 Within the European Union there has also been concern about low pay and an attempt to link this with the perceived low quality of work, with one report suggesting that ‘policies towards low-wage jobs should centre on their quality at least as importantly as on the level of pay which they provide’.2 Part-time work in particular has been the subject of attention because of its relatively low pay, poorer conditions and limited career prospects, but similar arguments apply to temporary employment and fixed term contracts.


Hourly Wage Union Membership British Household Panel Survey Fixed Term Contract Earning Mobility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akerlof, G.A., Rose, A.K. and Yellen, J.L. (1988) ‘Job Switching and Job Satisfaction in the U.S. Labour Market’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, pp. 495–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borjas, G.J. (1979) ‘Job Satisfaction, Wages and Unions’, Journal of Human Resources, 14, pp. 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, M. (2001) ‘Unequal Pay, Unequal Responses? Pay Referants and their Implications for Pay Level Satisfaction’, Journal Management Studies, 38(6), September, pp. 879–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, A.E. (1998) ‘What Makes a Good Job? Evidence from OECD Countries’, Universite d’Orleans, mimeo.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, A.E. (2001) ‘What Really Matters in a Job? Hedonic Measurement Using Quit Data’, Labour Economics, 8(2) May, pp. 223–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, A.E. and Oswald, A.J. (1996) ‘Satisfaction and Comparison Income’, Journal of Public Economics, 69, pp. 57–81.Google Scholar
  7. Clegg, C.W. (1983) ‘Psychology of Employee Lateness, Absence and Turnover: Methodology, a Critique and an Empirical Study’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, pp. 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Union (2001) Employment in Europe 2001; Recent Trends and Prospects, Employment and Social Affairs, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  9. European Union (2002) Employment in Europe 2002; Recent Trends and Prospects, Employment and Social Affairs, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  10. Francesconi, M. (2001) ‘Determinants and Consequences of Promotions in Britain’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, pp. 279–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freeman, R.B. (1978) ‘Job Satisfaction as an Economic Variable’, American Economic Review, 68, pp. 135–41.Google Scholar
  12. Hamermesh, D.S. (1977) ‘Economic Aspects of Job Satisfaction’, in Ashenfelter, O.E. and Oates, WE. (eds), Essays in Labour Market Analysis, New York: John Wiley, pp. 53–72.Google Scholar
  13. Hamermesh, D.S. (2001) ‘The Changing Distribution of Job Satisfaction’, Journal of Human Resources, 36(1), Winter, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lydon, R. and Chevalier, A. (2002) ‘Estimates of the Effect of Wages on Job Satisfaction’, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE, mimeo, May.Google Scholar
  15. Mangione, J.W. and Quinn, R.P. (1975) ‘Job Satisfaction, Counter-Productive Behaviour and Drug Use at Work’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, pp. 114–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Major, B. and Forcey, B. (1985) ‘Social Comparisons and Pay Evaluations; Preferences for Same Sex and Same Job Wage Comparison’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, pp. 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rees, A. (1993) ‘The Role of Fairness in Wage Determination’, Journal of Labor Economics, 11, pp. 243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Salverda, W. et al. (2001) The European-American Employment Gap, Wage, Inequality, Earnings Mobility and Skill; A Study for France, Germany, the Netherlands, the UK and the U.S., Final Report, Employment and Social Affairs, European Commission, June.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Applied Econometrics Association 2004

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations