Electronic Voting in Finland: The Internet and its Political Applications

  • Maija Setälä
  • Kimmo Grönlund


Being a rich Western European country, Finland certainly belongs to the wired world. Based on a comparison of different aspects related to the information and communication technology (ICT) sector, such as research, development and employment, the OECD (2000) classifies Finland as a high ICT-intensive country. According to survey results, most Finnish households seem to be wired to the web. This is a relatively high proportion in the European context, although other Nordic countries and the Netherlands are ahead of Finland in this respect. According to other survey results, 61 per cent of Finns claim that they use the Internet personally. The usage is not evenly spread, however. Among young Finns, practically everyone uses the Internet. Moreover, students and professionals use the Internet much more extensively than other professional groups. Yet, unlike in many other countries, one cannot trace a substantial gender gap in the use of the Internet in Finland (Flash EB 88, 2001; Flash EB 112, 2002; see also Grönlund’s contribution in this volume).


Smart Card Presidential Election Voter Turnout Parliamentary Election Municipal Election 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ålands landskapsstyrelse (2001) ‘Informations- och kommunikationsteknik (IKT) i valprocessen. Slutrapport frÅn Arbetsgruppen för Internetröstning’, The Final Report of the Committee on Internet Voting, Mariehamn, September 2001, <>
  2. Ålands landskapsstyrelse (2001) ‘Rösta per Internet? En mellanrapport fr ån Arbetsgruppen för Internetröstning’, The Intermediate Report of the Committee on Internet Voting, Mariehamn, February 2001, <>
  3. Flash Eurobarometer 112 (2002) Internet and the Public at Large. European Commission, DG Press and Communication. Survey, November 2001. Analytical Report 21 January 2002.Google Scholar
  4. Flash Eurobarometer 88 (2000) Mayors. European Commission, DG Press and Communication. Survey, October 2000 [computer file].Google Scholar
  5. Flash Eurobarometer 88 (2000) Internet and the General Public. European Commission, DG Press and Communication. Survey, October 2000 [computer file].Google Scholar
  6. Karhulahti, M. and Laine, J. (1999) ‘Vaalit vai karnevaalit?’ A Research Report Elections of Carnivals? Kunnallisalan kehittämissäätiö, <>Google Scholar
  7. Finnish Ministry of Justice (2000) ‘The Minister’s Reply to the Speaker of the Parliament, 6 November 2000, <>Google Scholar
  8. Finnish Ministry of Justice (2001a) ‘A Proposal of the Finnish Government to the Parliament (Eduskunta) on the Amendment of the Electoral Law’, 18 June 2001, <>Google Scholar
  9. Finnish Ministry of Justice (2001b) ‘The Technical Development of the Electoral System. A Summary of the Comments on the Committee Report. A Memorandum’, 26 October 2001.Google Scholar
  10. OECD (2000) ‘Measuring the ICT Sector, <>Google Scholar
  11. Statistics Finland (1999) ‘Parliamentary Elections 1999’, Official Statistics of Finland. Elections 1999: 1. Helsinki.Google Scholar
  12. Statistics Finland Online Services, 25 May 2002, <>
  13. Suksi, M. (1996) ‘Finland: The Referendum as a Dormant Feature’, in M. Gallagher and P. Uleri (eds), The Referendum Experience in Europe. Basingstoke Macmillan-: Palgrave 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (Idea) (2002) ‘Voter Turnout — Global Data on Voter Turnout’, continuously updated, 10 June 2002, <>Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maija Setälä
  • Kimmo Grönlund

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations