Abstract
The first binding Internet election to take place anywhere in the world occurred in the United States during March 2000. Internet voting was offered as one option for casting a ballot in the Arizona Democratic Party primary election. Voters could also cast an early ballot by mail. Voters showing up at a polling location on Election Day could cast a traditional paper ballot or vote using a computer. The future of Internet voting in the United States looked quite bright at that historic moment. Turnout in the Arizona primary election doubled, the election took place without a breach in security, public opinion supported introducing Internet voting into all statewide elections, and young people (who typically vote at very low rates in the United States) expressed unprecedented enthusiasm for voting over the Internet. In the years following that election, momentum for Internet voting, and the United States slowed significantly. The 2002 federal and state elections took place without a trace of consideration for Internet voting, and the United States no longer occupies the ‘leading edge’ in the use of Internet technology for voting. In fact, the United States has fallen behind many European nations to a position more aptly thought of as ‘lagging behind.’
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Coleman, S. (2001) ‘Introduction’, in S. Coleman (ed.), Elections in the Age of the Internet: Lessons from the United States. London: Hansard Society.
Dunbar, J. (2001) ‘Internet Voting Project Cost Pentagon $73,809 Per Vote’, <http://www.public-i.org/story_01_080901.htm>
Internet Policy Institute (2001) Report of the National Workshop on Internet Voting: Issues and Research Agenda, <http://www.Internetpolicy.org/research/results.html>
Jones, B. (2000) California Internet Voting Task Force Report, <http://www.ss.ca.gov/executive/ivote/>
Morris, D. (1999) Vote.com. Los Angeles: Renaissance Books.
National Commission on Federal Election Reform (2001) ‘To Assure Pride and Confidence in the Electoral Process’, <http://www.reformelections.org/data/reports/99_full_report.pdf>
Solop, F. I. (2001) ‘Digital Democracy Comes of Age: Internet Voting and the 2000 Arizona Democratic Primary Election’, Political Science and Politics, 34 (2) (June): 289–93.
Solop, F. (2000a) ‘The 2000 Arizona Democratic Primary Election: What We Learned From the First Binding Internet Election’, e-voting workshop, National Science Foundation and the University of Maryland.
Solop, F. (2000b) ‘Digital Democracy Comes of Age in Arizona: Participation and Politics in the First Binding Internet Election’. The American Political Science Association meetings, Washington, DC.
Solop, F. (2000c) ‘Public Support for Internet Voting: Are We Falling Into a “Racial Ravine”?’ The American Association of Public Opinion Research meetings, Portland, OR.
UCLA (2000) ‘The UCLA Internet Report: Surveying the Digital Future’, <http://us4.israeline.com/ucla-Internet.pdf>
United States Census Bureau (2001) Home Computers and Internet Use in the United States (August), <http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p23-207.pdf>
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Solop, F.I. (2004). Electronic Voting in the United States: At the Leading Edge or Lagging Behind?. In: Kersting, N., Baldersheim, H. (eds) Electronic Voting and Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523531_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523531_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51891-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52353-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)