National School Policy Changes in Britain and Sweden

  • Christine Hudson
  • Anders Lidström


In both Britain and Sweden, responsibility for schools is shared between the central and local levels of government. Local policy-making is largely dependent on the decisions taken centrally, and these form a general context for local education policies. National education policies establish goals, set rules, provide resources and specify how outcomes should be evaluated. This context may be both constraining and enabling for local decision-makers, that is, it may limit some choices, but at the same time provide opportunities. The national policy context undergoes constant change, and it varies between countries, even if there may be similarities. Further, even if it forms a common context for all the local education authorities within a country, the national policy context must always be interpreted and applied in particular local situations.


Local Government Education System Central Government Secondary Education Education Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barber, M. 1994, ‘Power and Control in Education 1944–2004’, British Journal of Educational Studies, 42 (4): 348–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, R.J. 1990. ‘Decentralization, Local Government, and Markets: Is There a Post-Welfare Agenda in Planned and Market Economies?’, Policy Studies Journal, 18 (3): 683–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackledge, R.C. R. 1994. ‘The United Kingdom’, in Brock, C. and Tulasiewicz, W. (eds), Education in a Single Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Blair, P. 1991. ‘Trends in Local Autonomy and Democracy: Reflections from a European Perspective’, in Batley, R. and Stoker, G. (eds), Local Government in Europe. London: Macmillan Press — now Palgrave.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, W.L. 1992. ‘Parental Choice of Schools: An International Movement’, in Miron, G. (ed.), Towards Free Choice and Market-Oriented Schools: Problems and Promises. Stockholm: Institute of International Education/Skolverket.Google Scholar
  6. Burns, D., Hambleton, R. and Hoggett, P. 1994. The Politics of Decentralisation. London: Macmillan Press — now Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butcher, T. 1995. Delivering Welfare; The Governance of the Social Services in the 1990s. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chitty, C. 1992. The Education System Transformed. Manchester: Baseline Books.Google Scholar
  9. Convey, A. and Merritt, A. 2000, ‘The United Kingdom’, in Brock, C. and Tulasiewicz (eds), Education in a Single Europe, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Dale, R. 1989. The State and Education Policy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Daun, H. 1993. Omstrukturering av skolsystemen: Decentralisering, valfrihet och privatisering: En internationell översikt. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  12. DfEE 1996. Self-Government for Schools. White Paper Cm 3315. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  13. Ds, 1994. Skolans kostnader, effektivitet och resultat — en branschstudie. Rapport till Expertgruppen för studier i offentlig ekonomi, Finansdepartementet. Stockholm: Fritzes, 1994: 56.Google Scholar
  14. Falkner, K., 1997. Lärare och skolans omstrukturering. Pedagogiska institutionen, Uppsala universitet.Google Scholar
  15. Fägerlind, I. and Saha, L.J. 1989. Education and National Development: A Comparative Perspective, 2nd edn. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gewirtz, S., Ball, S.J. and Bowe, R., 1995. Markets, Choice and Equity in Education. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Glass, D.V. 1961. ‘Education and Social Change in Modern England’, in Habey, A.H., Floud, J. and Anderson, C.A. (eds), Education, Economy & Society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gustafsson, G. and Lidström, A. 1996. ‘Redefining the Concept of Educational Equality through Decentralization’, in Chapman, J.D., Boyd, W.L., Lander, R. and Reynolds, D. (eds), The Reconstruction of Education: Quality, Equality and Control. London, New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
  19. Heidenheimer, A.J., Heclo, H. and Adams, C.T., 1983. Comparative Public Policy. 2nd edn. London: Macmillan Press — now Palgrave.Google Scholar
  20. Hildebrand, S. 1969. Skola för demokrati. Stockholm: Sveriges Radio.Google Scholar
  21. Hill, D.M. 1994. Citizens and Cities. New York, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  22. Husén, T., Tuijnman, A. and Halls, W. D., 1992. Schooling in Modern European Society. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Isling, Å., 1980. Kampen för och mot en demokratisk skola. Del 1 — Samhällsstruktur och skolorganisation. Stockholm: Sober förlags AB.Google Scholar
  23. Isling, Å., 1988. Kampen för och mot en demokratisk skola. Del 2 — Det pedagogiska arvet. Stockholm: Sober förlags AB.Google Scholar
  24. John, P. 1991. ‘The Restructuring of Local Government in England and Wales’, in Batley, R. and Stoker, G. (eds), Local Government in Europe: Trends and Developments. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press — now Palgrave.Google Scholar
  25. Kelly, A.V. 1990. The National Curriculum: A Critical Review. London: Chapman.Google Scholar
  26. Landell, E. 1996. Skolan och tillväxten, in Svenska Kommunförbundet. Kommunerna och tillväxten — möjligheter och faror. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  27. Lindblad, S. 1994. ‘Notes on Post-Welfare Education: Towards a New-Liberal Education Reform in Sweden?’, in Kallós, D. and Lindblad, S. (eds), New Policy Contexts for Education: Sweden and United Kingdom. Umeå universitet: Pedagogiska institutionen.Google Scholar
  28. Lindensjö, B. and Lundgren, U.P. 1986. Politisk styrning och utbildningsre-former. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  29. Lindvall, K. and Ekholm, M. 1997. Tillsättning av skolledare — rörelser i tiden. Karlstad: Högskolan i Karlstad.Google Scholar
  30. Marklund, S. 1980. Skolsverige 1950–1975. Del 1: 1950 års skolbeslut. Stockholm: Liber Utbildingsförlaget.Google Scholar
  31. Miron, G. 1996. ‘Choice and the Quasi-market in Swedish Education’, in Walford, G. (ed.), ‘School Choice and the Quasi-market’, Oxford Studies in Comparative Education, 6 (1): 33–47.Google Scholar
  32. Municio-Larsson, I. 1999. ‘Rhetoric and Organizational Change’, Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, 102 (3): 262–77.Google Scholar
  33. OECD 1994. School: A Matter of Choice. Paris.Google Scholar
  34. OECD 1995. Decision-making in 14 OECD Education Systems. Paris.Google Scholar
  35. OECD 1997. Education at a Glance. Paris.Google Scholar
  36. Peele, G. and Adonis, A. 1990. ‘Education and Local Government — Future Prospects’, in New Horizons for Education. London: Association of District Councils.Google Scholar
  37. Proposition 1997/98:169 (Government bill) Gymnasieskola i utveckling — kvalitet och likvärdighet.Google Scholar
  38. Ranson, S. 1994. Towards the Learning Society. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  39. Ranson, S. 1995. ‘From Reform to Restructuring of Education’ in Stewart, J. and Stoker, G. (eds), Local Government in the 1990s. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press — Palgrave.Google Scholar
  40. Ranson, S., Leach, S., Hinings, R. and Skelcher, C. 1986. ‘Nationalising the government of education’ in Goldsmith, M., (ed.), New Research in Central — Local Relations. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  41. Regeringens skrivelse 1996/97:112. Utvecklingsplan för förskola, skola och vux-enutbildning.Google Scholar
  42. Rhodes, R.A.W. and Marsh, D. 1992. ‘New Directions in the Study of Policy Networks’, European Journal of Political Research, 21 (1–2): 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Richardson, G. 1983. Drömmen om en ny skola: Idéer och realiteter i svensk skolpolitik1945–1950. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  44. Riley, K. 1990. ‘Education and the Role of the District Councils’, in New Horizons for Education. London: Association of District Councils.Google Scholar
  45. Robins, L. 1987. ‘Issues in Education’, in Jones, B. (ed.), Political Issues in Britain Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sheldrake, J. 1992. Modern Local Government. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  47. Simon, B. 1974. Education and the Labour Movement. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  48. Skolverket 1996. Skolan och de ekonomiska resurserna. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  49. Skolverket 1997. Ansvaret för skolan — en kommunal utmaning. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  50. Skolverket 1998. Skolan: Jämförelsetal för skolhuvudmän. Organisation — Resurser-Resultat. Delrapport mars 1998.Google Scholar
  51. SOU 1992:94. Skola för bildning: Betänkande av läroplanskommittén. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  52. Sullivan, M. 1996. The Development of the British Welfare State. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  53. Svenska Kommunförbundet 1998. Aktuellt om skolan: Augusti 1998. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  54. Whitty, G. 1990. ‘The Politics of the 1988 Education Reform Act’, in Dunleavy, P., Gamble A., and Peele, G. (eds), Developments in British Politics3. London: Macmillan Press — now Palgrave.Google Scholar
  55. Whitty, G., Power, S. and Halpin, S. 1998. Devolution and Choice in Education: The School, the State and the Market. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Wolman, H. 1988. ‘Understanding Recent Trends in Central–Local Relations: Centralisation in Great Britain and Decentralisation in the United States’, European Journal of Political Research, 16 (add ): 425–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Young, K. and Mills, L. 1993. A Portrait of Change. London: The Local Government Management Board.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Hudson
  • Anders Lidström

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations