Skip to main content

New Labour’s Politics of the Hard-working Family

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter uses the case of New Labour’s family politics to investigate the general claim that the party rejects a social democratic politics ‘grounded in collective agency, attachments, and interests’ (Krieger, 1999, p. 19).1 It argues that New Labour has not abandoned the attempt to construct political subjects, as its politics both presupposes the existence of bonds of community and seeks to strengthen them. This is, in fact, the core of Blair’s ‘social-ism’: an ethical judgement that individuals are socially interdependent human beings who owe a duty to one another and to a broader society (Blair, 1994, p. 4). But does the displacement from class to the notoriously slippery concept of community leave the meaning of this collectivity radically unspecified, and therefore incapable of constituting lasting attachments (Krieger, 1999, p. 160)? I argue that it does not, because the particular case of the ‘hard-working family’ is promulgated as typical of the universal notion of community, providing it with a concrete representation. My main thesis, then, is that the ‘hardworking family’ has emerged as the principle subject posited by New Labour politics. This marks the abandonment of the working man (and his dependants) as Labourism’s historical subject. As Mandelson and Liddle put it, ‘Whereas the old left saw its job as to represent trade unions, pressure groups and the “working class” … New Labour stands for the ordinary families who work hard and play by the rules’ (1996, p. 18).

Keywords

  • Unpaid Work
  • Labour Party
  • Discourse Theory
  • Social Democratic Party
  • Daily Mail

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1057/9780230523364_10
  • Chapter length: 24 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-0-230-52336-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Anderson, P., and Mann, N. (1997) The Making of New Labour (London, Granta).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002 [1998]) Reinventing the Family (Cambridge, Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1998) Talking of the Royal Family (London, Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (1994) Socialism (London, Fabian Society).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (1996) New Britain: My Vision of a Young Country (London, Fourth Estate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (1998) The Third Way: New Politics for the New Century (London, Fabian Society).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (1999) Speech to Labour Party Conference, 28 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (2000) Speech to the Women’s Institutes’ Triennial General Meeting, 7 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (2001) ‘The Power of Community Can Change the World’, Speech to the Labour Party Conference, 3 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (2002a) ‘New Labour and Community’, Renewal, 10.2: 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (2002b) Tony Blair talks to Newsnight, 14 May http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/1985222.stm.

  • Blair, T., and Schröder, G. (1999) Europe: the Third Way/die Neue Mitte (London, The Labour Party and SPD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M., Clark, T., and Wakefield, M. (2001) Social Security under New Labour: What Did the Third Way Mean for Welfare Reform? (London, Institute for Fiscal Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (1994) ‘The Politics of Potential’, in D. Miliband (ed.), Reinventing the Left (London, Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T., Myck, M., and Smith, Z. (2001) Fiscal Reform affecting Households, 1997–2001 (London, Institute for Fiscal Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Social Justice (1994) Social Justice: Strategies for National Renewal (London, Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (1999), ‘The Parabola of Working Class Politics’, in A. Gamble and T. Wright, The New Social Democracy (Oxford, Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, F. (1988) ‘Hegemony and Democracy: On Laclau and Mouffe’, Strategies, 1: 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, A., and Mann, K. (1997) ‘Moralism and Modernity: the Paradox of New Labour Thinking on Welfare’, Benefits, 20: 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, A., and Mann, K. (1999) ‘Agency, modernity and social policy, Journal of Social Policy, 28: 3: 413–35.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Social Security (1998) New Ambitions for Our Country: a New Contract for Welfare, Cm. 3805 (London, The Stationery Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, S., and Martell, L. (1997) ‘New Labour’s Communitarians’, Critical Social Policy, 17.3: 27–46.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, S., and Martell, L. (1998) New Labour: Politics after Thatcherism (Cambridge, Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, S., and Martell, L. (2002) ‘New Labour, Work and the Family’, Social Policy & Administration, 36.1: 46–61.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Durham, M. (2001) ‘The Conservative Party, New Labour and the Politics of the Family’, Parliamentary Affairs, 54: 459–74.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, G. (1993) Labourism and the English Genius (London, Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies (Oxford, Oxford University Press).

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1995) The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda (London, Fontana).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2000) New Labour, New Language? (London, Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, A. (1999) ‘Third Way Theory’, Political Quarterly: 271–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, A. (2003) Making Sense of New Labour (London, Lawrence and Wishart).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984), ‘What Is an Author?’, in P. Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault Reader (Harmondsworth, Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Harding, L. (2000) Supporting Families/Controlling Families? Towards a Characterisation of New Labour’s Family Policy, Working Paper no. 21 (Centre for Research on Family, Kinship and Childhood, University of Leeds).

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, M. (2000), ‘Labour and Gender’, in D. Tanner, P. Thane, and N. Tiratsoo, Labour’s First Century (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, B. (1998) Tough on Soundbites, Tough on the Causes of Soundbites: New Labour and News Management, Cataylst Paper 3 (London, Catalyst Trust).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, S. (1999) Having None of It: Women, Men and the Future of Work (London, Granta).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, E. (1999), ‘Unpicking Political Communitarianism: a Critique of “the Communitarian Family”’, in G. Jagger and C., Wright (eds), Changing Family Values (London, Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, M. (1996) Ideologies and Political Theory (Oxford, Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, M. (1999a) ‘The Ideology of New Labour’, Political Quarterly, 70.1: 42–51.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, M. (1999b), ‘True Blood or False Genealogy: New Labour and British Social Democratic Thought’, in A. Gamble and T. Wright (eds), The New Social Democracy (Oxford, Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1999) Runaway World (London, Profile Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennester, H. (2000) British Social Policy since 1945, 2nd edn (Oxford, Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, P. (1999) The Unfinished Revolution (London, Little, Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, P., and Hewitt, P. (1993) ‘Lessons from America’, Renewal January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1988) The Hard Road to Renewal (London, Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (1996), ‘“Contract” and “Citizenship”’, in D. Marquand and A. Seldon (eds), The Ideas That Shaped Post-war Britain (London, Fontana).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay C., and Watson, M. (2003) ‘The Discourse of Globalisation and the Logic of No Alternative: Rendering the Contingent Necessary in the Political Economy of New Labour’, Policy and Politics, 31: 3: 289–305.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury (2002) The Child and Working Tax Credits: the Modernisation of Britain’s Tax and Benefit System (London, HM Treasury).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1998a) New Ambitions for Our Country: a New Contract for Welfare (London, The Stationery Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1998b) Supporting Families: a Consultation Document (London, The Stationery Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G., and Little, A. (1999) ‘The Contradictions of New Labour’s Communitarian-ism’, Imprints, 4: 1: 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1994), ‘The Transition to Post-Fordism and the Schumperterian Workfare State’, in R. Burrows and B. Loader (eds), Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State? (London, Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, S. (1999), ‘Middle England’, in M. Linton, K. Raymond, and A. Whitehead (eds), Beyond 2002: Long-term Policies for Labour (London, Profile Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, J. (1999) British Politics in the Global Age: Can Social Democracy Survive? (Cambridge, Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1977) Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory (London, Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1990) New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (London, Verso)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1996) Emancipation(s) (London, Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E., and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (London, Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. (2000) Living on Thin Air: the New Economy (Harmondsworth, Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (1998) The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. (2000), ‘Discursive Histories, the Pursuit of Multiculturalism and Social Policy’, in G. Lewis, S. Gewirtz, and J. Clarke (eds), Rethinking Social Policy (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (1993), ‘Introduction: Women, Work, Family and Social Policies in Europe’, in J. Lewis (ed.), Women and Social Policies in Europe (London, Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (1997) ‘Gender and Welfare Regimes: Further Thoughts’, Social Politics, 4: 2 (Summer): 160–77.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (1998). ‘Work, Welfare and Lone Mothers’, Political Quarterly, 69: 4–13.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2002), ‘Individualisation, Assumptions about the Existence of an Adult Worker Model and the Shift towards Contractualism’, in A. Carling, S. Duncan, and E. Edwards (eds), Analysing Families: Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice (London, Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (2001) ‘Doing Good by Stealth: the Politics of Poverty and Inequality under New Labour’, New Economy, 65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, D. (2000) Mandelson (London, Harper Collins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelson, P., and Liddle, R. (1996) The Blair Revolution: Can New Labour Deliver? (London, Faber & Faber).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manifesto for New Times (1989) ‘The New Times’, in S. Hall and M. Jacques (eds), New Times: the Changing Face of Politics in the 1990s (London, Lawrence and Wishart).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (1993) Return of the Political (London, Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (2001) Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panitch, L. (1972) ‘Ideology and Integration: the Case of the British Labour Party’, Political Studies, 19: 2: 184–200.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S. (1993) Family, Dependence and the Origins of the Welfare State (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelling, H. (1965) The Origins of the Labour Party 1880–1900 (Oxford, Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentoul, J. (2001) Tony Blair (London, Warner Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (1993) The McDonaldisation of Society (Thousand Oaks, CA, Pine Forge Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassoon, D. (1996) One Hundred Years of Socialism (London, Fontana).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E. (1996) The Labour Party since 1945 (Oxford, Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman Jones, G. (1983) Languages of Class (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderbrouke, F. (1999), ‘European Social Democracy’, in A. Gamble and T. Wright (eds), The New Social Democracy (Oxford, Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, H. (ed.) (2000) Family Business (London, Demos).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reyes, O. (2005). New Labour’s Politics of the Hard-working Family. In: Howarth, D., Torfing, J. (eds) Discourse Theory in European Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523364_10

Download citation