Abstract
Few topics in our discipline rival the social rate of discount as a subject exhibiting simultaneously a very considerable degree of knowledge and a very substantial level of ignorance. Economists understand thoroughly just what this variable should measure: the opportunity cost of postponement of receipt of any benefit yielded by a public investment. They agree also on the components that should be considered in making up this figure: primarily the welfare foregone by not having these benefits available for immediate consumption or reinvestment and (perhaps) a premium corresponding to the risk incurred in undertaking government projects. Above all, economists are quite generally in accord on the view that a very serious misallocation of resources can result from the use of an incorrect estimate of the value of this variable in a cost-benefit calculation. Yet, while they agree that exernalities can play a significant role in the matter, there is some considerable question even about the direction of these effects. There is substantial obscurity and divergence of views in discussions of the implications of differences (if indeed there are any) in the degree of risk that is incurred when a given project is undertaken by a private firm on the one side and by government on the other.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
K. J. Arrow, “Discounting and Public Investment Criteria,” in A. V. Kneese and S. C. Smith, eds., Water Research, Baltimore 1966.
W. J. Baumol, Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State, 2nd ed. Cambridge Mass. 1965.
Otto Eckstein, Water-Resource Development: The Economics of Project Evaluation. Cambridge, Mass. 1961.
Jack Hirshleifer, J. C. DeHaven and J. J. Milliman, Water Supply; Economics, Technology and Policy. Chicago 1960.
Jack Hirshleifer, “Investment Decision Under Uncertainty: Applications of the State-Preference Approach,” Quart. Jour. Econ., May 1966, 80, 252–77.
H. E. Klarman, “Syphilis Control Programs,” in Robert Dorfman, ed., Measuring Benefits of Government Investments, Washington 1965.
J. V. Krutilla and Otto Eckstein, Multiple Purpose River Development. Baltimore 1958.
R. C. Lind, “Further Comment,” Quart. Jour. Econ., May 1964, 78, 336–44.
Fritz Machlup, Discussion of a paper by Weisbrod, in Dorfman, editor [6].
M. S. March, Discussion of a paper by Weisbrod, in Dorfman, editor [6].
S. A. Marglin, “The Social Rate of Discount and the Optimal Rate of Investment,” Quart. Jour. Econ., Feb. 1963, 77, 95–112.
P. A. Samuelson, “Principles of Efficiency: Discussion,” Am. Econ. Rev., Proc., May 1964, 54, 93–96.
A. K. Sen, “On Optimizing the Rate of Saving,” Econ. Jour., Sept. 1961, 71, 479–96.
——, “Isolation, Assurance and the Social Rate of Discount,” Quart. Jour. Econ., Feb. 1967, 81, 112–24.
Gordon Tullock, “The Social Rate of Discount and the Optimal Rate of Investment: Comment,” Quart. Jour. Econ., May 1964, 78, 331–36.
William Vickrey, “Principles of Efficiency: Discussion,” Am. Econ. Rev., Proc., May 1964, 54, 88–92.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1974 American Economic Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baumol, W.F. (1974). On the Social Rate of Discount. In: Gopalakrishnan, C. (eds) Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523210_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523210_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41750-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52321-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)