Skip to main content

A Theoretical Framework for the Understanding of Teams

  • Chapter
Teamwork

Abstract

In his description of the aims of a projected workshop on teamwork the distinguished economist Michael Bacharach included the following examples of teams in the human world: couples, families; workgroups, platoons, sports teams and street gangs; nations in times of war, international military alliances, terrorist cells.1 This list makes it clear how vital it is to understand the nature and functioning of teams if one is to understand and, one might add, cope with the human situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bittner, Rudiger (2002) ‘An Action for Two’ in Georg Meggle (ed.) Social Facts and Collective Intentionally (Deutsche Bibliothek der Wissenschaften, Dr. Hansel-Hohenhausen Ag: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, Michael (1993) ‘Shared Intention’, Ethics (104), 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret (1989) On Social Facts (Princeton University Press: Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret (1990) ‘Walking Together: A Paradigmatic Social Phenomenon’ in Midwest Studies in Philosophy (15) P. A. French, T. E. Uehling Jr. and H. K. Wettstein (eds) reprinted in Gilbert, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret (1993) ‘Agreements, Coercion, and Obligation’, Ethics (103), 679–706, reprinted in Gilbert (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret (1996) Living Together: Rationality, Sociality, and Obligation (Rowman and Littlefield: Lanham, MD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret (1997) ‘What is it for us to Intend?’ in G. Holmstrom-Hintikka and R. Tuomela (eds) Contemporary Action Theory, vol. 2., The Philosophy and Logic of Social Action (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht), reprinted in Gilbert, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret (1999) ‘Obligation and Joint Commitment’, Utilitas (11), 143–163, reprinted in Gilbert (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret (2000) Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays in Plural Subject Theory (Rowman and Littlefield: Lanham, MD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret (2001) ‘Collective Preferences, Obligations, and Rational Choice’, Economics and Philosophy (17), 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret (2002) ‘Considerations on Joint Commitment: Responses to Various Comments’ in Georg Meggle (ed.) Social Facts and Collective Intentionally (Deutsche Bibliothek der Wissenschaften, Dr. Hansel-Hohenhausen Ag: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret (2003) ‘The Structure of the Social Atom: Joint Commitment as the Foundation of Human Social Behaviour’, in Frederick Schmitt (ed.) Social Metaphysics (Rowman and Littlefield: Lanham, MD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret (in press) ‘After Atrocity: the Possibility and Pointfulness of Collective Feelings of Guilt’ in Charles Jones (ed.) War Crimes (McGill University Press: Montreal).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret (2005, forthcoming) ‘Shared values, Social Unity, and Liberty’, Public Affairs Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret (forthcoming) Rights Reconsidered (Oxford University Press: Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutz, Christopher (2000) Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David (1969) Convention: A Philosophical Study (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, Stephen (1972) Meaning (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John (1990) ‘Collective Intentions and Actions’ in P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, M. E. Pollack (eds) Intentions in Communication (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, Andrew (1981) Economic Theory of Social Institutions (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, Robert (2000) ‘Team Preferences’, Economics and Philosophy (16), 175–204.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Margaret Gilbert

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gilbert, M. (2005). A Theoretical Framework for the Understanding of Teams. In: Gold, N. (eds) Teamwork. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523203_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics