Skip to main content

South Africa: Proportional Representation in the Puzzle to Stabilize Democracy

  • Chapter

Abstract

The institutions of the Union of South Africa (established in 1910) were largely inherited from the British colonial institutions which had been first imported and then adapted by the British/Dutch/French settler regime which had controlled South African administration since the eighteenth century. Thus a classically British system of single-member districts and plurality rule was used for all elections to the effectively whites-only House of Assembly which sat until it was swept away in 1994. Between 1910 and 1948 governments were dominated by coalitions led by English South African parties. However, in 1948 D. F. Malan’s Afrikaner National Party won 52 per cent of the seats in parliament (with 42 per cent of the popular vote) to Jan Smut’s United Party’s 42 per cent of the seats (based on 52 per cent of the popular vote). Subsequently every government between 1948 and 1994 was based on a National Party majority. The ending of apartheid and the collapse of the white regime in South Africa led to a switch to list proportional representation to elect members of the National Assembly in 1994 and beyond.

Keywords

  • Electoral System
  • Democratic Party
  • Proportional Representation
  • African National Congress
  • National Party

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Davis, Gavin (2003) Encouraging Exclusivity: The Electoral System and Campaigning in the 1999 South African Election. MA dissertation, Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Courtney and Ian Shapiro (1995) ‘South Africa’s Negotiated Transition,’ Politics and Society, 23: 269–308.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Andrew (1993) Voting for a New South Africa. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Andrew (1999) Electoral Systems and Democratization in Southern Africa. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sisk, Timothy D. (1995) Democratization in South Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Asmal, Kader (1990) Electoral Systems: A Critical Survey. Bellville, UWC: CDS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Gavin (2003) Encouraging Exclusivity: The Electoral System and Campaigning in the 1999 South African Election. MA dissertation, Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Courtney and Ian Shapiro (1995) ‘South Africa’s Negotiated Transition,’ Politics and Society, 23: 269–308.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kotze, Hennie (1996) ‘Proportional Representation in Multi-Member Constituencies,’ in Jacques de Ville, Jacques Steytler and Nico Steytler (eds), Voting in 1999: Choosing an Electoral System. Cape Town: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Andrew (1993) Voting for a New South Africa. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Andrew (1994) Election ‘94: South Africa: An Analysis of the Results, Campaigns and Future Prospects. New York: St. Martin’s Press — now Palgrave Macmillan; Cape Town: David Philip; London: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Andrew (1999a) Election ‘99: South Africa: From Mandela to Mbeki. New York: St. Martin’s Press — now Palgrave Macmillan; Cape Town: David Philip; London: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Andrew (1999b) Electoral Systems and Democratization in Southern Africa. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sisk, Timothy D. (1995) Democratization in South Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reynolds, A. (2004). South Africa: Proportional Representation in the Puzzle to Stabilize Democracy. In: Colomer, J.M. (eds) The Handbook of Electoral System Choice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522749_25

Download citation