Skip to main content

Some Alien Qualities of Samuel Johnson’s Art

  • Chapter
Samuel Johnson in Historical Context

Part of the book series: Studies in Modern History ((SMH))

  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

In recent decades scholars of the visual arts have demonstrated rather convincingly that aesthetic responses are largely conditioned by one’s previous experiences of art. In other words, we recognise something as artful only when we have been schooled, either formally or informally, in its techniques.1 Thus the Impressionist painters, whose artistry is immediately recognisable to modern viewers, often seemed crude or ridiculous to their contemporaries, especially to their ‘academic’ contemporaries.2 Our modern taste, though, has been trained to respond to their paintings, and we may even have been taught to see the natural world differently through their eyes. Conversely, when an artistic movement has had its day, the skills of reading its cues and interpreting its symbols can be lost, leaving the art with a distant, alien feel. Thus Egyptian art will often seem to us inscrutably formal; and the mosaics of Ravenna, which represented the height of artitic sophistication in their day, can seem naive, even simplistic, coming as they do in the wake of the great realistic achievements of the Greco-Roman tradition.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Erwin Panofsky, ‘The History of Art as a Humanistic Discipline’, originally published in 1940 and reprinted in Meaning in the Visual Arts (Chicago, 1982), pp. 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sir Ernst Gombrich, Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation (2nd edn., Princeton, 1961). Panofsky discusses the ‘cultural equipment’ necessary to interpret a work of art created under an alien aesthetic (pp. 14–19), and Gombrich examines such issues as the need to ’learn to read’ unfamiliar images and the expectations that we bring to any work of art (pp. 53–62). Gombrich develops these issues extensively in the section called ’The Beholder’s Share’ (pp. 181–287).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For some early responses to the Impressionists, see Joyce Cary, Art and Reality (New York, 1958), pp. 67–70.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quoted in Bernard L. Einbond, Samuel Johnson’s Allegory (The Hague, 1971), p. 26. I rely heavily on Einbond throughout this portion of the essay.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaminski, T. (2002). Some Alien Qualities of Samuel Johnson’s Art. In: Clark, J., Erskine-Hill, H. (eds) Samuel Johnson in Historical Context. Studies in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522695_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522695_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42238-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52269-5

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics