Skip to main content

Health Service Reform and the Modernization of Employment Relations: The Case of the United Kingdom

  • Chapter
Labour Relations and Health Reform
  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

There can be few organizations whose restructuring has been as controversial and as subject to so much media scrutiny as the reforms of the National Health Service (NHS) over the last twenty years. Health service reform is not confined to the UK; across all continents governments are struggling to reconcile increased patient expectations with the reluctance of employers and employees to contribute more resources to maintain the growth of health services. The distinctiveness of the UK experience, however, is the degree to which health sector reform has formed a central component of the domestic political agenda for more than two decades. This reform process has altered employment relations but there is uncertainty about the consequences for employees, employers and trade unions. In the health service the degree to which the market-style reforms of Conservative governments and the modernization agenda of the Labour government has transformed employment relations has been a source of controversy. During the 1990s, Conservative government ministers suggested that their reforms were leading to staff working to higher performance standards; managers had acquired the autonomy and influence to establish their own organizational employment practices, without hindrance from trade unions or interventionist governments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrowsmith, J. and Mossé, P. 2000. Hospital Reform and the Working Time of Hospital Nurses in England and France, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 6(3), 283–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission 2001. Brief Encounters: Getting the Best from Temporary Nursing Staff. London: The Audit Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission 2002. Recruitment and Retention: A Public Service Workforce for the Twenty-first Century. London: Audit Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, S. 1999. ‘From National Pay Determination to Qualified Market Relations: NHS Pay Bargaining Reform’, Historical Studies in Industrial Relations, 8: 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, S. 2004. Employment Relations and the Health Service: The Management of Reforms. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, S. and Givan, R. 2004. ‘Public Service unionism in a restructured public sector: challenges and prospects’, in Kelly, J. and Willman, P. (eds) Union Organisation and Activity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, S. and Givan, R. 2005. ‘Union Responses to Public-Private Partnerships in the National Health Service’, in Fernie, S. and Metcalf, D. (eds) British Unions: Resurgence or Perdition? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, S. and Winchester, D. 2003. ‘Industrial Relations in the Public Sector’ in Edwards, P. K. (ed.) Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice, Second Edition, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, N. and Storey, J. 2000. ‘New Employee Strategies in Britain: Towards Individualism or Partnership?’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(3), 407–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. 2002. The Courage of our Convictions: Why reform of the public services is the route to social justice. London: Fabian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, C., Jackson, M. and Leopold, J. (1995). ‘The Impact of Self-governing Trusts on trades unions and staff associations in the NHS’, Industrial Relations Journal, 26(2), 120–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, J. and Seccombe, I. 2002. Behind the Headlines: A review of the UK labour market in 2001. London: RCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchill, F. 1995. ‘Professional Unions in the National Health Service: Issues and Membership Trends’, Review of Employment Topics, 3(1), 13–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchill, F. and Casey, A. 1996. Human Resource Management. The NHS: A Case Study. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, B. and Poynter, G. 1999. ‘Unions in a changing climate: MSF and Unison experiences in the new public sector’, Industrial Relations Journal, 30(5), 499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certification Officer 2004. Annual Report of the Certification Officer 2003–2004. London: Certification Office for Trade Unions and Employers’ Associations. http://www.certoffice.org/annualReport/pdf/Full%20report%202003-2004A.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Colling, T. 1999. ‘Tendering and Outsourcing: Working in the Contract State’ in Corby, S. and White, G. (eds) Employee Relations in the Public Services. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corby, S., Millward, L., White, G., Drucker, J. and Meerabeau, E. 2001. Innovations in Pay and Grading in NHS Trusts. Greenwich, University of Greenwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health 1989. Working for Patients. Cm. 555. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health 1999. Agenda for Change: Modernising the NHS Pay System. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health 2002a. Improvement, Expansion and Reform: The Next Three Years. Priorities and Planning Framework 2003–2006. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health 2002b. HR in the NHS Plan. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health 2002c. A Modernised NHS Pay System http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/03/49/64/04034964.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health 2004a. National Standards, Local Action: Health and Social Care Standards and Planning Framework 2005/06–2007/08. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health 2004b. Staff in the NHS 2004. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health 2004c. Delivering HR in the NHS Plan 2004. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health 2004d. The NHS Improvement Plan: Putting People at the

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health 2005a. Creating a Patient-led NHS: Delivering the NHS Improvement Plan. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health 2005b. NHS hospital and community health services non-medical staff in England: 1994–2004. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health 2005c. Hospital, Public Health Medicine and Community Health Services Medical and Dental Staff in England: 1994–2004. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health 2005d. Statistics for General Medical Practitioners in England: 1994–2004. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C. and Robinson, O. 2004. ‘Evaluating the Business Case for Part-Time Working amongst Qualified Nurses’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(1), 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. and Duffus, K. 1996. What has been happening to pay in the publicservice sector of the British economy? Developments over the period 1970–92. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34(1), 51–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, A. 2002. ‘Expressions of Interest in Early Implementation of the New NHS Pay System (Agenda for Change), Letter to Chief Executives of NHS Trusts, July 2nd. Available at www.doh.gov.uk/agendaforchange

    Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, H. and Holt, H. 2005. Trade Union Membership 2004. London: DTI. http://www.dti.gov.uk/er/emar/trade_union_membership2004.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, D. 1999. ‘Changes in Skills-mix and Pay Determination among the Nursing Workforce in the UK’, Work, Employment and Society, 13(2), 295–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham, C. 2000. The Politics of NHS Reform 1988–1997: Metaphor or Reality? London: King’s Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, N., Mason, B. and Morgan, J. 2001. Partnership and Multi-Unionism in the Health Service, Industrial Relations Journal, 33(2), 112–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsman, M. 2003. Continuity and Change: Public Sector Pay Review Bodies, 1992–2003, Public Money and Management 23(4), 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Incomes Data Service (2001a). ‘Pay and bargaining prospects 2001/2002’, IDS Report 842, London: Incomes Data Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Incomes Data Service (2001b). ‘Public sector pay in 2001’, IDS Report 839, London: Incomes Data Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Incomes Data Service (2003). ‘Pay Modernisation in the NHS’, IDS Report 884, London: Incomes Data Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, L. and Lissauer, R. 2003. The Future Health Worker. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, I. and Heron, P. 2001. ‘Steward Organization in a Professional Union: The Case of the Royal College of Nursing’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(3), 367–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King’s Fund 2005. An Independent Audit of the NHS Under Labour (1997–2005). London: King’s Fund. Available at: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/pdf/fullaudit.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, I. and Hoque, K. 2005. ‘The decentralization of employment relations in the British public sector’, Industrial Relations Journal, 36(2), 100–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labour Research 2003. ‘NHS deal gets nervy welcome’, Labour Research, 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. 2002. ‘The Labour Government and the National Health Service’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, D. 2001. ‘Managed Competition, Governmentality and Institutional Response in the United Kingdom’, Social Science and Medicine, 52(8), 1167–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, B. and Shaw, B. 2001. ‘Are Public Sector Managers the Profession’s Poor Relations’, Human Resource Management Journal, 11(3), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, D. and French, S. 1998. What a Performance: Performance Related Pay in the Public Services. London: Centre for Economic Performance.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, A. 2003. ‘Reconciling competing pressures for working-time flexibility: an impossible task for the National Health Service (NHS)’, Work Employment and Society, 17(1), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, A. 2002. ‘Working Together – Involving Staff, Employee Relations, 24(3), 277–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NHS Employers 2005. Independent Sector Treatment Centres: Human resources framework. http://www.nhsemployers.org/docs/hr_framework_0105.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS Staff Council 2004. Agenda for Change: Review of Experience in the Early Implementer Sites. http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/08/82/16/04088216.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Nursing and Midwifery Council 2004. Statistical analysis of the register 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004. http://www.nmc-uk.org

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD 2004a. Health Data, 3rd Edition. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD 2004b. OECD Economic Survey of the United Kingdom 2004. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Procter, S. and Currie, G. 1999. ‘The Role of the Personnel Function: Roles, Perceptions and Processes in an NHS Trust’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(6), 1077–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Public Administration Select Committee 2003. On Target? Government by Measurement, Fifth Report of Session 2002–03, HC 62-I. London: House of Commons. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmpubadm/1264/126402.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J., Purcell, K. and Tailby, S. 2004. ‘Temporary Work Agencies: Here Today, Gone Tomorrow?’ British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(4), 705–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Review Body for Nursing and Other Health Professionals (RBNOHP) 2004. Report on the key lessons from the Early Implementers of Agenda for Change in England 2003. http://www.ome.uk.com/

    Google Scholar 

  • Review Body for Nursing and Other Health Professionals 2005. Report of findings from follow up visits to the Early Implementers in England 2004. http://www.ome.uk.com/review.cfm?body=6

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, R. 1992. Industrial Relations in the NHS. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tailby, S., Richardson, M., Stewart, P., Danford, A. and Upchurch, M. 2004. ‘Partnership at work and worker participation: an NHS case study’, Industrial Relations Journal, 35(5) 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tailby, S. and Winchester, D. 2005. ‘Management and Trade Unions: Partnership at Work?’ In Bach, S. (ed.) Managing Human Resources: Personnel Management in Transition, 4th Edition, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, M. 1996. ‘Negotiating the Government of UNISON: Union Democracy in Theory and Practice’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34(1), 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornley, C. 2003. ‘What Future for Health Care Assistants: High Road or Low Road?’ in Davies, C. (ed.), The future health workforce. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transport and General Workers Union (2002) Enron NHS? Foundation Hospitals and the backdoor privatization of the National Health Service. London: TGWU. http://www.tgwu.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Undy, R. 1999. ‘Negotiating Amalgamations: Territorial and Political Consolidation and Administrative Reform in Public Sector Service Unions in the UK’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 37(3), 445–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNISON 2002. PFI: Failing Our Future – A UNISON Audit of the Private Finance Initiative. London: UNISON. http://www.unison.org.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISON 2003. Foundation Hospitals and the NHS Plan. London: UNISON. http://www.unison.org.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, J. and Kerr, A. 1999. ‘Trying to stem the flow: union membership turnover in the public sector’, Industrial Relations Journal, 30(3), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanless, D. 2001. Securing Our Future Health: Taking a Long-Term View: Interim Report London: The Treasury. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/wanless

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanless, D. 2002. Securing Our Future Health: Taking a Long-Term View: Final Report. London: The Treasury. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/wanless

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G. 2000. ‘The Pay Review Body System: Its Development and Impact’, Historical Studies in Industrial Relations, 9: 71–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. and Hatchett, A. 2003. ‘The Pay Review Bodies in Britain Under the Labour Government’, Public Money and Management, 23(4), 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winchester, D. 2005 ‘Agreement on implementation of pay reforms in the National Health Service’, http://www.eiro.eurofound.eu.int/2005/01/feature/uk0501105f.html

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Kurt Wetzel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bach, S. (2005). Health Service Reform and the Modernization of Employment Relations: The Case of the United Kingdom. In: Labour Relations and Health Reform. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514621_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics