Abstract
It is generally accepted that there is no single theory of the state to be found in Marx’s writings but a variety of themes and perspectives, some of which appear to be at odds with each other (Miliband, 1965; Jessop, 1977 and 1984; Barrow, 1993; Wetherly, 1998; Hay, 1999). A common distinction is between an ‘instrumentalist’ conception of the state (most famously expressed in The Communist Manifesto1) and an idea of the state as autonomous from the dominant class (found in The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte2). For Miliband (1965) these constitute, respectively, Marx’s ‘primary’ and ‘secondary’ views on the state. According to Elster the central question in the Marxist theory of the state is whether it is autonomous with respect to class interests, or entirely reducible to them’ (Elster, 1985, p. 402).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Paul Wetherly
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wetherly, P. (2005). Marx, the State and Functional Explanation. In: Marxism and the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514614_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514614_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40554-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51461-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)