Abstract
Russian history, like that of all European nations, has been shaped by a constant succession of wars against neighbouring peoples. Although the Kievan state founded in the ninth century saw periods of relative peace, it was riven for much of its existence by internecine conflicts between rival princes of the ruling house. Competition among the Russian princes only really came to an end with the consolidation of Moscow as the dominant political force among the Eastern Slavs in the early sixteenth century. In the meantime it left the Russian lands open to periodic attack from the nomadic peoples of the steppe — the Pechenegs, the Polovtsians and most notably the Tatars (Mongols) — who held Russia under their suzerainty for over two hundred years, from the early thirteenth century to the fifteenth. Later there were regular clashes with the Swedes, Poles, Lithuanians and Teutonic knights to the north and west and with the empire of the Ottoman Turks to the south. As Muscovy gradually expanded eastwards from its European heartland, across Siberia in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and into the Caucasus and Central Asia in the nineteenth, it clashed with numerous other populations, which were more or less reluctantly incorporated into the Russian empire. By the late nineteenth century this saga of battle and conquest had not only defined the geographical boundaries of the Russian state, but had also exercised a profound influence over its cultural self-definition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
D. Likhachev, The Great Heritage: the Classical Literature of Old Rus, Moscow, 1981, pp. 216–17.
For succinct accounts of the historical background to the Tale, see ibid., pp. 165–72; N. K. Gudzii, History of Early Russian Literature, New York, 1970, pp. 158–60.
The Nikonian Chronicle, vol. 2, From the Year 1132 to 1240, ed. Serge A. Zenkovsky, trans. Serge A. and Betty Jean Zenkovsky, Princeton, 1984, p. 188.
Roman Jakobson, ‘The Puzzles of the Igor’ Tale on the 150th Anniversary of its First Edition’, in his Selected Writings, vol. 4, Slavic Epic Studies, The Hague, 1966, pp. 382–3.
See O. V. Tvorogov, ‘Literatura perioda feodal’noi razdroblennosti, XII-pervoi poloviny XIII veka’, in N. I. Prutskov (ed.), Istoriia russkoi literatury, vol. 1, Leningrad, 1980, pp. 82–3.
Dimitri Obolensky (ed.), The Penguin Book of Russian Verse, rev. edn, Harmondsworth, 1965, p. 19.
Whether in the broader twelfth-century context dynastic conflicts between the princes in fact substantially undermined the Russian polity is open to question: see Simon Franklin and Jonathan Shepard, The Emergence of Rus, 750–1200, London, 1996, pp. 365–71.
For the evidence on the authorship of the Tale see, for example, R. Mann, Lances Sing: A Study of the Igor Tale, Columbus, Ohio, 1990, pp. 2–3, 136–42;
V. A. Rybakov, Russkie letopistsy i avtor ‘Slova o polku Igorove’, Moscow, 1972, pp. 393–512.
John Fennell and Dimitri Obolensky (eds), Historical Russian Reader: a Selection of Texts from the XIth to the XVIth Centuries, Oxford, 1969, pp. 73, 75;
partly translated by John Fennell in John Fennell and Antony Stokes, Early Russian Literature, London, 1974, p. 83.
G. V. Moskvicheva, Russkii klassitsizm, Moscow, 1986, p. 23.
For an account of the Moldavian campaign, see Demetrius Dvoichenko-Markov, ‘Lomonosov and the Capture of the Fortress of Khotin in 1739’, Balkan Studies, vol. 8, 1967, pp. 68–70.
M. V. Lomonosov, Izbrannye proizvedeniia v dvukh tomakh, Moscow, 1986, vol. 2, p. 205.
See Stephen L. Baehr, ‘From History to National Myth: Translatio imperii in Eighteenth-Century Russia’, Russian Review, vol. 37, 1978, pp. 1–13.
Firuz Kazemadeh, ‘Russian Penetration of the Caucasus’, in Taras Hunczak (ed.), Russian Imperialism from Ivan the Great to the Revolution, New Brunswick, 1974, pp. 255–7.
See especially Susan Layton, Russian Literature and Empire: Conquest of the Caucasus from Pushkin to Tolstoy, Cambridge, 1994.
See also Paul M. Austin, ‘The Exotic Prisoner in Russian Romanticism’, Russian Literature, vol. 16, 1984, pp. 217–274;
Katya Hokanson, ‘Literary Imperialism, Narodnost’, and Pushkin’s Invention of the Caucasus’, Russian Review, vol. 53, 1994, pp. 336–52;
Peter Scotto, ‘Prisoners of the Caucasus: Ideologies of Imperialism in Lermontov’s “Bela”’, PMLA, vol. 107, 1992, pp. 246–60.
Quoted in Tatiana Wolff (ed.), Pushkin on Literature, London, 1971, p. 63.
A. S. Pushkin, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v desiati tomakh, vol. 4, Moscow, 1963, pp. 130–1.
See Patrick Cuttrell, ‘Walter Scott’, in Boris Ford (ed.), From Blake to Byron (Pelican Guide to English Literature, vol. 5), Harmondsworth, 1979, pp. 110–11.
On the Sevastopol Stories see R. F. Christian, Tolstoy: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge, 1969, pp. 58–67.
L. N. Tolstoi, Sobranie sochinenii v dvadtsati tomakh, ed. N. N. Akopova et al., vol. 2, Moscow, 1960, p. 111.
On Tolstoi as a philosopher of history see I. Berlin, ‘The Hedgehog and the Fox’, in his Russian Thinkers, London, 1978, pp. 22–81;
E. B. Greenwood, Tolstoy: The Comprehensive Vision, London, 1975, pp. 57–64.
Gary Saul Morson, Hidden in Plain View: Narrative and Creative Potentials in War and Peace’, Aldershot, 1988, p. 86.
R. F. Christian, Tolstoy’s War and Peace’: a Study, Oxford, 1962, pp. 107–8.
M. B. Khrapchenko, Lev Tolstoi kak khudozhnik, 4th edn, Moscow, 1978, p. 125.
Tolstoi, Sobranie sochinenii, vol. 4, 1961, p. 380.
Edward Wasiolek, Tolstoy’s Major Fiction, Chicago, 1978, p. 70.
It was noted at an early stage that Tolstoi’s writing also had a considerable impact on war journalism: see P. Kropotkin, Russian Literature, London, 1905, p. 124.
On Garshin’s own experience in the Russo-Turkish War and on contemporary reaction to Four Days, see A. Latynina, Vsevolod Garshin: tvorchestvo i sud’ba, Moscow, 1986, pp. 54–75.
V. M. Garshin, Rasskazy, Moscow, 1986, pp. 15–16.
Peter Henry, A Hamlet of His Time: Vsevolod Garshin and his Age, Oxford, 1983, pp. 46–7.
A. H. Keesman-Marwitz, ‘Ivanov’s Race with Time (On V. Garšin’s “Četyre dnja”)’, in E. de Haard, T. Langerak and W. G. Weststejn (eds), Semantic Analysis of Literary Texts: to Honour Jan van der Eng on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday, Amsterdam, 1990, pp. 354–5.
Karl D. Kramer, ‘Impressionist Tendencies in the Work of Vsevolod Garšin’, in V. Terras (ed.), American Contributions to the Seventh International Congress of Slavists, vol. 2, Literature and Folklore, The Hague, 1973, pp. 339–45.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 David Wells
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wells, D. (1999). Paradigms of War in Russian Literature from the Twelfth to the Nineteenth Century. In: Wells, D., Wilson, S. (eds) The Russo-Japanese War in Cultural Perspective, 1904–05. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514584_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514584_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39478-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51458-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)