Abstract
Social policy is concerned with social values and collectively defined needs. The consensus is at once the conservative consequence of past occurrences and the radical cause of future departures. Welfare policies vary with ideology in time and space rather than converging to equilibrium along a unique developmental trajectory. Privatisation would threaten the self-perpetuating community by legitimating the divisiveness of the Hobbesian bellum. Socialism would reinforce the bonds of belonging by putting in place integrative institutions which reaffirm the common and the shared. The social scientist, a social actor like his fellows, cannot afford to neglect the methodological importance of multidisciplinarity, understanding, a sensitivity to social purpose and an acceptance that there are limits beyond which the statistics will never go. What it all adds up to is this, that ‘social administration as a subject is not a messy conglomeration of the technical ad hoc’1 but instead a focus for the ‘imaginative excitements of unifying perspectives and principles’.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J.M. Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936), in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. VIII (London: Macmillan, 1973), p. 372.
W.H. Beveridge, Social Insurance and Allied Services (Cmd. 6404) (London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1942), p. 163.
W.H. Beveridge, Full Employment in a Free Society (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1944), pp. 121, 122.
W.H. Beveridge, Voluntary Action (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1948), p. 319.
W. Temple, Christianity and Social Order (1942) (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1956), p. 17. The much-cited declaration ‘In place of the conception of the Power-State we are led to that of the Welfare-State’ may be found in his Citizen and Churchman (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1941), p. 36.
J.M. Winter and D.M. Joslin, eds, R.H. Tawney’s Commonplace Book (1912–1914) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972), pp. 53–4.
P. Townsend, ‘Politics and Social Policy: An Interview’, Politics and Power, Vol. 2, 1980, p. 107.
I. Illich, Limits to Medicine (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1977), p. 239.
Cited in M.L. Johnson, ‘Patients: Receivers or Participants?’, in K. Barnard and K. Lee, eds, Conflicts in the National Health Service (London: Croom Helm, 1977), p. 74.
L. Doyal and I. Gough, A Theory of Human Need (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991), p. 42.
J.M. Buchanan, Liberty, Market and State (Brighton: Wheatsheaf, 1986), p. 51.
See A.H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality, 2nd edn (New York: Harper and Row, 1970), esp. Chs 2–5.
G. Myrdal, Beyond the Welfare State (London: Methuen, 1960), pp. 63–4.
T.H. Marshall, The Right to Welfare and Other Essays (London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1981), p. 71.
R.H. Tawney, ‘Social Democracy in Britain’ (1949), in his The Radical Tradition, ed. by R. Hinden (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1966), p. 172.
J. O’Connor, The Fiscal Crisis of the State (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1973), p. 1.
A. Downs, ‘Why The Government Budget Is Too Small In A Democracy’, World Politics, Vol. 12, 1960, p. 544.
See also A. Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper and Row, 1957) and
D.A. Reisman, Theories of Collective Action: Downs, Olson and Hirsch (London: Macmillan, 1990).
K. Marx and F. Engels, The Communist Manifesto (1848), in Karl Marx, Selected Works (London: Lawrence and Wishart Ltd, 1942), Vol. I, p. 207.
J.M. Buchanan, The Limits of Liberty (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975), p. 157.
M. Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962), p. 15.
R.H. Tawney, ‘We Mean Freedom’ (1944), in his The Attack and Other Papers (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1953), p. 97.
R.M. Titmuss, F.J. Fisher and J.R. Williams, R.H. Tawney: A Portrait by Several Hands (London: privately published and printed by the Shenval Press, 1960), pp. 28, 33.
M. Weber, ‘Bureaucracy’, in H.H. Gerth and C.W. Mills, eds, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1948), p. 228.
A. Downs, Inside Bureaucracy (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1967), p. 111.
Copyright information
© 2001 David Reisman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reisman, D. (2001). Part One: Evaluations and Extensions. In: Richard Titmuss. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512917_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512917_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42059-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51291-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)