Drawing the Line: Organizations and the Boundary Work of “Home” and “Work”

  • Christena Nippert-Eng


Consider your keys; calendars; purse and/or wallet contents; commuting, drinking, and reading habits; your lunchtime and vacation plans; the photographs in your living room and work space; and the people with whom you socialize. These items, along with numerous others, have one thing in common. They are dimensions through which each of us draws the line between home and work. Often practical yet eminently symbolic, publicly visible yet intimately revealing, these are the kinds of activities through which each of us places a mental, physical, and behavioral boundary between these two realms.


Daycare Center Boundary Work Reading Habit Workplace Policy Home Schooling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bateson, Gregory. 1972 [1955]. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  2. Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckman. 1967. The social constitution of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  3. Coser, Lewis. 1974. Greedy institutions: Patterns of undivided commitment. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Douglas, Mary. 1985 [1966]. Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul (Ark edition).Google Scholar
  5. Durkheim, Emile. 1965 [1912]. The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Durkheim, Emile, and Marcel Mauss. 1963 [1903]. Primitive classification. Translated and edited by Rodney Needham. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, Michel. 1973 [1966]. The order of things. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  8. Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Revie. 48: 781–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lamont, Michele, and Marcel Fournier, eds. 1992. Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Mannheim, Karl. 1972. Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge, Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Nippert-Eng, Christena. 1996. Home and work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nippert-Eng, Christena, and Gary Alan Fine. 1999. The pursuit of workplace culture. Cultur. 13 (3): 2–5.Google Scholar
  14. Schutz, Alfred. 1973. On multiple realities. Collected Papers, Vol. 1. 4th ed. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  15. Spillman, Lyn, ed. 2001. Cultural sociology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Waugh, Linda R. 1982. Marked and unmarked: A choice between unequals in semiotic structure. Semiotic. 38: 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and society: An outline o f interpretive sociology. Vols 1 & 2. Berkeley, CA. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Williams, Raymond. 1985 [1976]. Keywords. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1991. The fine line: Making distinctions in everyday life. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. — 1987. The language of time: Toward a semiotics of temporality. Sociological Quarterl. 28: 343–54.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Christena Nippert-Eng 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christena Nippert-Eng

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations