Abstract
After the passage of the first Passenger Act in 1803, the tide of public opinion in Britain regarding emigration began to turn. The long debate over assisted emigration eventually would be the medium through which emigration came to be perceived as a positive force in imperial expansion rather than a threat to the project of modernising the country. Perhaps that was as a result of the limitations to modernisation that became increasingly apparent after 1815, as postwar depression began to bite. There was a sense of economic crisis in Britain throughout the first half of the nineteenth century, although parts of the country continued to expand commercially and industrially. But there were obvious winners and losers, with the losers and those who thought they might be losers increasingly becoming interested in emigration, and the winners increasingly minded to allow them to emigrate. Within that change in the ideology of emigration, there was growing debate over whether to channel emigrants to the overseas empire or turn a blind eye to the growing importance of the United States as an emigrant destination. In 1801–1803, part of the anti-emigration rhetoric had been about preventing emigrants to add to the strength of the United States, and the initial interest in assisting emigrants to go to Canada had been to ensure that Canada would remain British and not become American.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Stephen Fender, Sea Changes: British Emigration and American Literature (1992), p. 35.
For examples, see Ray Boston, British Chartists in America (1971).
This is not directly addressed by Miles Taylor in some recent publications, but is implicit in his analysis: Miles Taylor, ‘Colonial Representations at Westminster, c. 1800–65’ in Julian Hoppit (ed.), Parliaments, Nations and Identities in Britain and Ireland, 1660–1850 (2003), pp. 206–220;
Miles Taylor, ‘Empire and Parliamentary Reform’ in Arthur Burns and Joanna Innes (eds), Rethinking the Age of Reform: Britain 1780–1850 (2003), pp. 295–311.
Fender, Sea Changes, pp. 43–4, 369. Also see Charlotte Erickson, Invisible Immigrants, pp. 117–8 and Erickson, Leaving England (1994), pp. 52–53.
See Erickson, Leaving England, Chapters 4 & 5; William E. Van Vugt, Britain to America: Mid-Nineteenth-Century Immigrants to the United States (1999).
Miller, Emigrants and Exiles, citing Arnold Schrier, Ireland and the American Emigration 1850–1900 (1970).
Kerby Miller and Bruce Boling, ‘Golden Streets, Bitter Tears: The Irish Image of America During the Era of Mass Migration’, Journal of American Ethnic History, Vol. 10 (1990–1991), p. 27.
I have heard this letter quoted with relish by Dr Gary Howells at several conferences; see Gary Howells, ‘“For I was tired of England Sir”: English pauper emigrant strategies, 1834–60’, Social History, Vol. 23 (1998), p. 188,
quoting from the full text of Frewin’s letter published in Charlotte Erickson (ed.), Emigration from Europe 1815–1914: Select Documents (1976), pp. 129–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Alexander J. Murdoch
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murdoch, A. (2004). Hidden History: The British Emigrant to the United States 1803–1860. In: British Emigration, 1603–1914. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512252_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512252_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41481-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51225-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)