Abstract
Observers and practitioners alike testify to the vital role of communication in diplomacy. In fact, diplomacy is often defined in terms of communication—as “a regulated process of communication”3 or “the communication system of the international society,”4 to mention but two examples. “The pristine form of diplomacy,” argues Hedley Bull, “is the transmitting of messages between one independent political community and another.”5 Etymologically, the word “diplomacy” is derived from the Greek verb diploun, “to double,” and from the Greek noun diploma, which refers to an official document written on double leaves joined together and folded.6 Diploma has the double connotations of a secret message and an official paper conferring certain rights to the bearer. Symbolic representations of diplomacy, too, tend to highlight its communicative aspects. For instance, the illustrations in Byzantine manuscripts of a scroll handed from a bowing envoy to a seated figure are “a clear shorthand for an embassy.”7
Communication is to diplomacy as blood is to the human body Whenever communication ceases, the body of international politics, the process of diplomacy, is dead, and the result is violent conflict or atrophy
Tran, Communication and Diplomacy in a Changing World1
Communication is the essence of diplomacy There has never been a good diplomat who was a bad communicator.
Stearns, Talking to Strangers2
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
V.D. Tran, Communication and Diplomacy in a Changing World (Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1987), p. 8.
M. Stearns, Talking to Strangers: Improving American Diplomacy at Home and Abroad (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996), p. 112.
C.M. Constantinou, On the Way to Diplomacy (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1996), p. 25.
A. James, “Diplomacy and International Society,” International Relations, 6 (1980) 942.
H. Bull, The Anarchic Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan, 1977), p. 164.
M. Mullett, “The Language of Diplomacy,” in J. Shepard and S. Franklin (eds), Byzantine Diplomacy (Aldershot: Variorum, 1992), p. 204.
See, for example, H. Nicolson, Diplomacy, 3rd edn (New York: Oxford University Press, 1977), pp. 5–6.
J. Der Derian, On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987), pp. 44–67.
A. Eban, The New Diplomacy (London: Weidenfeld&Nicolson, 1983), p. 333;
A. James, “Diplomacy,” Review of International Studies, 19 (1993) 96;
G. R. Berridge, Talking to the Enemy: How States without “Diplomatic Relations” Communicate (London: Macmillan and New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994).
M.J. Reddy, “The Conduit Metaphor—A Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language,” in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).
A. Ostrower, Language, Law, and Diplomacy, 2 volumes (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1965), p. 72.
B. Lafont, “International Relations in the Ancient Near East: The Birth of a Complete Diplomatic System,” Diplomacy and Statecraft, 12 (2001) 43.
E. Satow, Satow’s Guide to Diplomatic Practice, 5th edn, ed. Lord Gore-Booth (London and New York: Longman, 1979), p. 38.
W. Pohl, “The Barbarian Successor States,” in L. Webster and M. Brown (eds), The Transformation of the Roman World: ad 400–900 (London: British Museum Press, 1997), p. 44.
G. Mattingly, Renaissance Diplomacy (London: Jonathan Cape, 1955), p. 236.
H. Nicolson, The Evolution of Diplomatic Method (Londo: Constable, 1954; reprinted by Diplomatic Studies Programme, Centre for the Study of Diplomacy, University of Leicester, 1998), p. 57.
E. Plischke, Conduct of American Diplomacy, 3rd edn (Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1967), p. 18.
R. Rommetveit, On Message Structure: A Framework for the Study of Language and Communication (London: John Wiley, 1974), p. 88.
L.G. Lose, “Communicative Action and the World of Diplomacy,” in K.M. Fierke and K.E. Jørgensen (eds), Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation (Armonk, NY and London: M.E. Sharpe, 2001), p. 185.
C. Jönsson, Communication in International Bargaining (London: Pinter, 1990), p. 31.
R. Cohen, International Politics: The Rules of the Game (London and New York: Longman, 1981), p. 32.
K. Hamilton and R. Langhorne, The Practice of Diplomacy: Its Evolution, Theory and Administration (London and New York: Routledge, 1995), p. 32.
G.R. Berridge, Diplomacy: Theory and Practice (London: Prentice-Hall; Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1995), p. 41.
See R. Cohen, “Intelligence in the Amarna Letter,” in R. Cohen and R. Westbrook (eds), Amarna Diplomacy: The Beginning of International Relations (Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000).
J.M. Munn-Rankin, “Diplomacy in Western Asia in the Early Second Millennium BC,” Iraq, XVIII, pt. 1 (1956) 104.
Cf. K. Nag, Theories of Diplomacy in Kautilya’s Arthasastra (Calcutta: Writers Workshop Publications, 1997), p. 101;
G.J. Roy, Diplomacy in Ancient India (New Delhi: Janaki Prakashan, 1981), p. 150.
B. Campbell, “Diplomacy in the Roman World (c. 500 BC-AD 235),” Diplomacy and Statecraft, 12 (2001) 19.
M. Herman, “Diplomacy and Intelligence,” Diplomacy and Statecraft, 9 (1998) 7.
W.P. Davison, “Mass Communication and Diplomacy,” in J.N. Rosenau, K.W. Thompson and G. Boyd (eds), World Politics: An Introduction (New York: The Free Press, 1976), p. 391;
J. Tusa, “Diplomats and Journalists—Sisters under the Skin,” The World Today, 52 (Aug./Sept. 1996) 218.
J. Eayrs, Diplomacy and Its Discontents (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1971), p. 7.
K. Gruber, “Common Denominators of Good Ambassadors,” in M.F. Herz (ed.), The Modern Ambassador: The Challenge and the Search (Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, 1983), pp. 62–3.
M. Mallett, “Italian Renaissance Diplomacy,” Diplomacy and Statecraft, 12 (2001) 66.
A.A. Berger, Signs in Contemporary Culture: An Introduction to Semiotics (New York and London: Longman, 1984), p. 20.
C. Bell, The Conventions of Crisis: A Study in Diplomatic Management (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971), p. 74.
L.S. Frey and M.L. Frey, The History of Diplomatic Immunity (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1999), pp. 14–15;
N.O. Brown, Hermes the Thief: The Evolution of a Myth (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1947).
J. Shepard, “Information, Disinformation and Delay in Byzantine Diplomacy,” in C. Jönsson and R. Langhorne (eds), Diplomacy, Volume II (London: Sage, 2004), p. 153.
R. Jervis, The Logic of Images in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970), p. 70.
M. Liverani, International Relations in the Ancient Near East, 1600–1100 BC (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2001), p. 181.
R. Cohen, Theatre of Power: The Art of Diplomatic Signalling (London and New York: Longman, 1987), p. 20.
G. Fisher, International Negotiation: A Cross-Cultural Perspective (Chicago, IL: Intercultural Press, 1980), p. 46.
R. Cohen, Negotiating Across Cultures: International Communication in an Interdependent World, 2nd revised edn (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1997), p. 152.
Cf. C. Jönsson, “Diplomatic Signaling in the Amarna Letters,” in R. Cohen and R. Westbrook (eds), Amarna Diplomacy: The Beginning of International Relations (Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000), pp. 197–8.
A.B. West, “The Early Diplomacy of Philip II of Macedon Illustrated by His Coins,” Numismatic Chronicle, Fifth Series, Volume III (1923).
J. Osborne, “Politics, Diplomacy and the Cult of Relics in Venice and the Northern Adriatic in the First Half of the Ninth Century,” Early Medieval Europe, 8 (1999) 369–86.
Cf. C. Jönsson, “The Suez War of 1956: Communication in Crisis Management,” in A.L. George (ed.), Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1991).
A. Watson, Diplomacy: The Dialogue Between States (London: Eyre Methuen, 1982), p. 33.
See, for example, C. Jönsson, “Diplomacy, Bargaining and Negotiation,” in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage, 2002).
RC. Iklé, How Nations Negotiate (New York: Praeger, 1964), p. 2.
R. Britton, “Chinese Interstate Intercourse before 700 B.C.,” in C. Jönsson and R. Langhorne (eds), Diplomacy, Volume II (London: Sage, 2004), pp. 105–7.
Cf. RE. Adcock and J. Mosley, Diplomacy in Ancient Greece (London: Thames and Hudson, 1975), pp. 210–14;
C. Reus-Smit, The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999), pp. 40–62.
K.J. Holsti, Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 191.
J. Kaufmann, Conference Diplomacy, 3rd revised edn (Houndmills: Macmillan, 1996).
R. Fisher and W. Ury, Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1981), pp. 118–22;
H. Raiffa, The Art and Science of Negotiation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982), pp. 205–17.
R.H. Mnookin and J.R. Cohen, “Introduction,” in R.H. Mnookin and L.E. Susskind (eds), Negotiating on Behalf of Others (London: Sage, 1999), p. 2.
P.R. Evans, H.K. Jacobson and R.D. Putnam (eds), Double-Edged Diplomacy (Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1993).
Cf. G.R. Winham, “ ‘Practitioners’ Views of International Negotiation,” World Politics, 32 (1979) 116–19;
I.W. Zartman and M.R. Berman, The Practical Negotiator (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 1982), p. 207;
G.R. Martin, “The ‘Practical’ and the ‘Theoretical’ Split in Modern Negotiation Literature,” Negotiation Journal, 4 (1988) 49–50.
R.D. Putnam, “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization, 42 (1988) 428–60.
D.W. Johnson, “Communication and the Inducement of Cooperative Behavior in Conflicts: A Critical Review,” Speech Monographs, 41 (1974) 74.
R. Numelin, The Beginnings of Diplomacy: A Sociological Study of Inter-tribal and International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1950), p. 227.
G. Herman, Ritualised Friendship and the Greek City (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 50–1.
H.W. Simons, Persuasion: Understanding, Practice, and Analysis (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1976), p. 50.
See J. Hartmann, Staatszeremoniell (Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 1988), p. 272.
J.D. Mosley, “Envoys and Diplomacy in Ancient Greece,” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte, Einzelschriften, Heft 22 (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1973), p. 43.
C.W. Thayer, Diplomat (New York: Harper&Brothers, 1959), p. 40.
G.T. Seaborg, Kennedy, Khrushchev, and the Test Ban (Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1981), p. 252.
C.P. Jones, Kinship Diplomacy in the Ancient World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), p. 18.
G.J. Roy, Diplomacy in Ancient India (New Delhi: Janaki Prakashan, 1981), p. 72.
A. Iqbal, Diplomacy in Islam: An Essay on the Art of Negotiation as Conceived and Developed by the Prophet of Islam, 3rd edn (Lahore: Institute of Islamic Culture, 1977), p. 76.
See G. Beckman, Hittite Diplomatic Texts (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1996), pp. 27, 62.
M. Mallett, “Italian Renaissance Diplomacy,” Diplomacy and Statecraft, 12 (2001) 65–6.
L.N. Rangarajan, “Diplomacy, States and Secrets in Communications,” Diplomacy and Statecraft, 9 (1998) 20.
M. Leonard, with C. Stead and C. Smewing, Public Diplomacy (London: The Foreign Policy Centre, 2002), p. 6.
E.H. Potter, “Canada and the New Public Diplomacy,” Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, no. 81 (The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations “Clingendael,” 2002), p. 3.
M. Leonard, “Diplomacy by Other Means,” Foreign Policy, 132 (2002) 50.
J. Kurbalija, “Diplomacy in the Age of Information Technology,” in J. Melissen (ed.), Innovations in Diplomatic Practice (London: Macmillan and New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999), p. 185.
T. Örn, Var for diplomati? [Why Diplomacy?] (Stockholm: Wahlström&Widstrand, 2002), p. 29.
W. Macomber, The Angels’ Game: A Commentary on Modern Diplomacy, revised edn (Dennisport, MA: Crane Corporation, 1997), p. 45.
D. Busk, The Craft of Diplomacy (London: Pall Mall Press, 1967), p. 238.
G. Jackson, Concorde Diplomacy: The Ambassador’s Role in the World Today (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1981), p. 5.
D.H. Dunn, “The Lure of Summitry: International Dialogue at the Highest Level,” Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, No. 13 (Leicester: Centre for the Study of Diplomacy, University of Leicester, 1996), p. 2.
J. Melissen, “Summit Diplomacy Coming of Age,” Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, no. 86 (The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations “Clingendael,” 2003), p. 3.
W.R. Roberts, “The Media Dimension II: Diplomacy in the Information Age,” The World Today, 47 (1991) 113.
T.J. McNulty, “Television’s Impact on Executive Decision-making and Diplomacy,” Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 17 (1993) 67.
S. Talbott, “Globalization and Diplomacy: A Practitioner’s Perspective,” Foreign Policy, 108 (1997) 69–83.
Cf. Y. Cohen, Media Diplomacy: The Foreign Office in the Mass Communication Age (London: Frank Cass, 1986);
C. Jönsson, “Diplomatic Signaling in the Television Age,” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1 (1996) 24–40;
E. Gilboa, “Diplomacy in the Media Age: Three Models of Uses and Effects,” Diplomacy and Statecraft, 12 (2001) 1–28.
E.S. Herman, “The Media’s Role in U.S. Foreign Policy,” Journal of International Affairs, 47 (1993) 23–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Christer Jönsson and Martin Hall
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jönsson, C., Hall, M. (2005). Communication. In: Essence of Diplomacy. Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511040_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511040_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54341-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51104-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)