Abstract
In 1996, genetically modified (GM) soybean was grown commercially in the USA for the first time. The soybeans had been made tolerant to a herbicide, glyphosate (Roundup) made by Monsanto. By growing the GM soybeans, farmers could spray the broad-spectrum herbicide on the crop without it being damaged and, thereby, weed control was made easier. Soybeans are a commodity crop and traded globally, so the GM soybeans were mixed with conventional ones and shipped across the world. As the soybeans were first imported into Europe at the end of 1996, Greenpeace revealed the movement of the GM soybeans and that they, or their derivatives (such as soybean oil or lecithin), would be found in around 60 per cent of processed foods on supermarket shelves and would not be labelled.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Advisory Committee on Novel Foods and Processes (1994) Report on the use of antibiotic resistance markers in genetically modified food organisms, London: MAFF.
Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment (1997) Annual Report No 4: 1996/97, London: DETR.
AEBC (2001) Crops on trial, London: Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission.
Barling, D. and Henderson, R. (2000) Safety First? A map of public sector research into GM food and food crops in the UK, Centre for Food Policy, Thames Valley University, London, Discussion paper 12.
Biotechnology and the European Public Concerted Action Group (1997) ‘Europe ambivalent on biotechnology’, Nature, vol. 387, pp. 845–7.
CEC (1991) Promoting the competitive environment for the industrial activities based on biotechnology within the Community, Commission Communication to Parliament and the Council, CEC (19) 629 final, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
CEC (2001) Towards a strategic vision of life sciences and biotechnology: consultation document, Communication from the Commission, COM (2001) 454 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
Clydesdale, F.M. (ed.) (1996) ‘Allergenicity of foods produced by genetic modification’, Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 36, special supplement.
Ewan, S.W.B. and Pusztai, A. (1999) ‘Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine’, The Lancet, vol. 354, pp. 1353–4.
Grove-White, R., Macnaghton, P., Mayer, S. and Wynne, B. (1997) Uncertain World. Genetically modified organisms: food and public attitudes in Britain, Lancaster: Centre for the Study of Environmental Change.
Hamstra, A.M. (1995) Consumer Acceptance Model for Food Biotechnology. Final Report, The Netherlands: SWOKA, Institute for Consumer Research.
Heasman, M. (1999) ‘The Functional Foods Revolution’, in Future Food, London: The Caroline Walker Trust.
International Association of Consumer Food Organizations (1999) Functional Foods — Public Health Boon or 21st Century Quackery?, London: The International Association of Consumer Food Organizations.
Kendall, H.W., Beachy, R., Eisner, T., Gould, F., Herdt, R., Raven, P.H., Schell, J.S. and Swaminathan, M.S. (1997) Bioengineering of crops: report of the World Bank Panel on Transgenic Crops, Washington, DC: World Bank.
Levidow, L. (1994) ‘Biotechnology regulation as symbolic normalisation’ Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 273–88.
Levidow, L. and Carr, S. (2000a) ‘UK: precautionary commercialization?’, Journal ofRisk Research, vol. 3, pp. 261–70.
Levidow, L. and Carr, S. (2000b) Environmental precaution as learning: GM crops in the UK, in Cow up a tree: Learning and knowledge for change in agriculture: Case Studies from Industrialised Countries, pp. 323–35, LEARN Group, ed. M. Cerf, D. Gibbon, B. Hubert, R. Ison, J. Jiggins, M. Paine, J. Proost, N. Roling, Versailles: INRA.
Lex, M. (1995) ‘Promoting the competitiveness of biotechnology in Europe’. Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 13, pp. 39–40.
Lutman, P.J.W. (1999) BCPC Symposium Proceedings No. 72: Gene flow and its consequences for GM oilseed rape. Farnham, Surrey: British Crop Protection Council.
MacKenzie, D. (1996) ‘Functional claims — opportunity or minefield?’, Low & Lite Digest, no. 5, March.
Millstone, E., Brunner E. and Mayer, S. (1999) ‘Beyond ’substantial equivalence, Nature, vol. 401, pp. 525–6.
Monsanto (1997) Report on Sustainable Development including Environmental, Safety and Health Performance, St Louis, Missouri: Monsanto.
Medical Research Council (2000) Report of an MRC working group on genetically modified (GM) foods London: Medical Research Council.
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1989) The Release of Genetically Engineered Organisms into the Environment, London: HMSO.
Royal Society (1998) Genetically modified plants for food use, London: Royal Society.
Royal Society (1999) Review ofdata on possible toxicity ofGM potatoes, 17 May 1999, London: Royal Society.
Royal Society of Canada (2001) Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada, Toronto: Royal Society of Canada.
Stirling, A. and Mayer, S. (2000) ‘Precautionary risk appraisal of a genetically modified crop’, International Journal of Occupational Health and Environmental Medicine, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 296–311.
Tiede, J.M., Colwell, R.K., Grossman, Y.L., Hodson, R.E., Kenski, R.E., Mack, R.N. and Regal, P.J. (1989) ‘The planned introduction of genetically engineered organisms: ecological considerations and recommendations.’ Ecology, vol. 70, pp. 298–315.
Vasil, I.K. (1998) ‘Biotechnology and food security for the 21st century: a real-world perspective’, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 16, pp. 399–400.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Ian W. Jones and Michael G. Pollitt
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mayer, S. (2002). Agricultural Biotechnology Hanging in the Balance: Why the Anti-GM Food Campaign has been so Successful. In: Jones, I.W., Pollitt, M.G. (eds) Understanding How Issues in Business Ethics Develop. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511033_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511033_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43293-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51103-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)