Do Consumers in Developing Countries Gain or Lose from Globalization?
- 116 Downloads
Drawing partly on the three previous chapters our main argument in this chapter will be that traditional consumption theory cannot serve as a framework for answering the question posed in the title because the theory cannot deal with the features of globalization that bear most tellingly on consumers in poor countries. More specifically, what we will describe is globalization as a process whose welfare effects on consumers are especially prone to the forms of uncertainty and disappointment that are assumed away in traditional demand theory.1 If one is to describe the actual gains and losses to consumers in developing countries from globalization, therefore, it is necessary to replace the assumptions of this theory with alternatives that describe reality more accurately. Before setting about this task, however, let us begin by examining how the assumptions of traditional demand theory preclude the possibility that consumers may experience feelings of frustration and disappointment, during acts of consumption that are undertaken because they are expected instead to yield satisfaction or utility.
KeywordsWelfare Effect Welfare Loss Traditional Theory Consumption Behaviour Advertising Expenditure
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- C. Barker (1997). Global Television, Blackwell.Google Scholar
- A. Chetley (1990). A Healthy Business: World Health and the Pharmaceutical Industry, Zed Books.Google Scholar
- R. Cyert and M. de Groot (1975). ‘Adaptive Utility’, in R. Day and T. Groves (eds), Adaptive Economic Models, Academic Press.Google Scholar
- M. Douglas and B. Isherwood (1979). The World of Goods, Allen Lane.Google Scholar
- R. Frank (1985). ‘The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods’, American Economic Review, March.Google Scholar
- R. Frank (1985a). Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- G. Ger and R. Belk (1996). ‘I’d like to Buy the World a Coke: Consumption-scapes of the “Less Affluent World”’, Journal of Consumer Policy, 19.Google Scholar
- J. Harsanyi (1954). ‘Welfare Economics of Variable Tastes’, Review of Economic Studies, 21 (3).Google Scholar
- J. Harsanyi (1992). ‘Utilities, Preferences and Substantive Goods’, WIDER, Working Paper No. 101.Google Scholar
- A. Hirschman (1982). Shifting Involvements, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- R. Nurkse (1957). Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries, Blackwell.Google Scholar
- O. Oliveira (1991). ‘Mass-media, Culture and Communication in Brazil: the Heritage of Dependency’, in G. Sussman and J. Lent (eds), Transnational Communications. Sage.Google Scholar
- S. Sachdeva (1988). ‘Advertising in India: Some Characteristics and Trends’, Working Paper, Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi.Google Scholar
- A. Sen (1985). Commodities and Capabilities, Elsevier.Google Scholar
- P. Shepherd (1985). ‘Transnational Corporations and the International Cigarette Industry’, in R. Newfarmer (ed.), Profits, Progress and Poverty, University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
- M. Silverman, P. Lee and M. Lydecker (1982). Prescriptions for Death: The Drugging of the Third World, University of California Press.Google Scholar
- T. Varis (1984). ‘The International Flow of Television Programs’, Journal of Communication, 34.Google Scholar
- J. Wells (1977). ‘The Diffusion of Durables in Brazil and its Implications for Recent Controversies Concerning Brazilian Development’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1 (3).Google Scholar
- World Bank (1998). World Development Report, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar