Skip to main content
  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

While first-wave feminism had brought about women’s political enfranchisement and had strengthened their legal rights, second-wave feminism developed out of the recognition that gender inequality was perpetuated as much by the power of ideology as by political and legal structures. The second wave thus went beyond campaigning for material change and began to explore and challenge dominant ideological representations of femininity. Apart from the construction of woman as sex-object (critiqued most famously in the 1968 Miss America ‘bra burning’ protest), the most entrenched ideological construction was that of woman-as-homemaker, the twentieth-century version of Coventry Patmore’s ‘Angel in the House’. Both the ideological construction and material determinants of such femininity came under attack, and from a bewildering variety of positions, for second-wave feminism was anything but uniform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for a Feminist Revolution (1970) (London: Jonathan Cape, 1971), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Germaine Greer, The Whole Woman (1999) (London: Anchor, 2000), pp. 94–106

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jane Green, Babyville (2001) (London: Penguin, 2002), p. 249.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See G.S. Dawes, F. Borruto, A. Zacutti and A. Zacutti Jr (eds). Fetal Autonomy and Adaptation (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rachel Morris, Ella and the Mothers (London: Sceptre, 1997), p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Doris Lessing, The Fifth Child (1988) (London: Flamingo, 2001), p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maeve Haran, All That She Wants (1998) (London: Warner Books, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jane Green, Babyville (2001) (London: Penguin, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sandra Matthews and Laura Wexler, Pregnant Pictures (London: Routledge, 2000), p. 203.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Celia Lury, Consumer Culture (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Carol Smart and Bren Neale, “T Hadn’t Really Thought About It”: New Identities/New Fatherhoods’, in Julie Seymour and Paul Bagguley, Relating Intimacies: Power and Resistance (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999), p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Clare Hanson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hanson, C. (2004). Reproductive Futures. In: A Cultural History of Pregnancy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510548_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics