Advertisement

Unions, Parties and the Sacrifice for Democracy

  • Louise Haagh
Part of the St Antony’s Series book series

Abstract

The literature on transitions to democracy encouraged us to focus on the unions’ capacity to produce conflict. This was implicit in the focus on the unions’ restraint versus mobilization (basically, their likely impact on democratic stability). This in turn precluded a more in-depth look at labour relations and the factors that motivate organized labour. In Chile, for example, we do not see the bell-curved shape of mobilization that O’Donnell and Schmitter associate with the role of labour during democratic transitions.1 The concern with the ‘restraint’ versus ‘mobilization’ of labour leaders also appeared to support the unfruitful assumptions about the limited preferences of labour leaders for wage gain, and their tendency to pursue those at all costs, which characterizes neo-classical writing on unions.

Keywords

Political Party Collective Bargaining Labour Relation Local Leader Union Leader 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Louise Haagh 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louise Haagh
    • 1
  1. 1.St Antony’s CollegeOxford UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations