Abstract
The significance of the Luddite disturbances in the northern counties of England in 1812 has engendered considerable debate, yet many aspects remain obscure.1 Despite E.P. Thompson’s contention that Luddism was a ‘quasi-insurrectionary movement, which continually trembled on the edge of ulterior revolutionary objectives’,2 the evidence on oath-taking, secret meetings and civilian arming remains perplexing, one fundamental cause being the reliability of the evidence of spies. In contrast to the scrutiny given to the ideology of the protesters, that of their chief persecutors has largely escaped attention.3 Yet, it may supply a clue to deciphering some of the extant evidence. Ralph Fletcher, a magistrate of Bolton, and John Lloyd, a solicitor and clerk to the magistrates of Stockport, were key figures. Fletcher’s informer, Bent, has been subjected to the scathing criticism of historians, but there has been little scrutiny of the crucial evidence of Thomas Whitehead and Joseph Taylor, employed by Lloyd, on the alleged Luddite oath.4 Others supplied evidence, but it was their information which was central to the case presented to the Secret Committees established by the government to inquire into the disturbances.5
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See J.L. and Barbara Hammond, The Skilled Labourer 1760–1832 (New York, 1967); Frank Ongley Darvall, Popular Disturbances and Public Order in Regency England (London, 1934); E.P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (Harmondsworth, 1980); Malcolm I. Thomis, The Luddites: MachineBreaking in Regency England (Newton Abbot, 1970); and John Dinwiddy, ‘Luddism and Politics in the Northern Counties’, Social History, 4, 1 (1979), pp. 33–63.
Ibid., pp. 536–7, 592, 633; Thomis, The Luddites, pp. 43, 147–9. For Lloyd, see Robert Glen, Urban Society in the Early Industrial Revolution (London, 1984), pp. 57–60, 73–5, 101–2, 223–4.
R. Nixon to J. Stockdale, 11 June 1814, in Appendix 21, Orange Institutions in Great Britain and the Colonies, British Parliamentary Papers, 1835 (605) [hereafter Orange Institutions], XVII: 179–80. This letter is dated 1834, but internal evidence indicates this is a printing error.
Hereward Senior, Orangeism in Ireland and Britain, 1795–1836 (London, 1966), p. 151; Nixon to J. Verner, 3 September 1808, in Appendix 21, Orange Institutions, XVII: 174.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turner, B. (2000). A Loyal Englishman?: John Lloyd and Aspects of Oath-taking in 1812. In: Davis, M.T. (eds) Radicalism and Revolution in Britain, 1775–1848. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230509382_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230509382_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41008-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50938-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)