Abstract
Many recent commentators have appealed to The Doctrine of Virtue in order to illustrate that Kant should not be criticized for not taking concepts such as virtue and character into account in his moral theory. It is indeed wrong to accuse Kant of ignoring virtue and character, but it is also wrong to assume that when Kant discussed virtue and character, and when Aristotle discussed virtue and character they were necessarily talking about the same thing. The quotes referred to in the previous chapter already hint at a radically different concept of virtue from the Aristotelian picture of gradual development and eventual harmony between the right reason and the right desire. It is important therefore to say a bit more about Kantian virtue. In doing so we will also consider whether Kantian virtue differs from Aristotelian virtue and, in part, whether Kant occasionally misinterprets Aristotle on virtue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Allison’s account of Gesinnung, and in particular (1990), p. 139.
Copyright information
© 2005 Nafsika Athanassoulis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Athanassoulis, N. (2005). Kant on Virtue. In: Morality, Moral Luck and Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230508040_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230508040_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51788-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50804-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)