Political Culture as a Research Agenda



Scholars have been debating the utility of the political culture concept for over 40 years. Thus, there are difficulties incumbent in employing such a diverse and broad concept. In many respects this chapter raises questions about whole bodies of political culture research written in the field of political science, and the scholarship that emerged focusing on the Soviet people and their successors. This literature review addresses the history of political culture research and the strengths and weaknesses of previous scholarship before portraying my political culture conceptualization as I strive to learn from — and build upon — past and present research. As will be shown, the political culture concept has not always been employed to its full potential.


Research Agendum Political Culture Liberal Democracy Russian Society Behavioral Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    G. Almond, ‘Comparative Political Systems’, Journal of Politics, Vol. 18, no. 3 (August 1956), 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Almond and S. Verba, The Civic Culture (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1963).Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Ibid., p. 22. Also L. Pye and S. Verba, eds, Political Culture and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton, 1965).Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    S. Welch, The Concept of Political Culture (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 10.
    A. Cohen, The Symbolic Construction of Community (New York: Ellis Horwood, 1985), p. 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 12.
    R. Putnam, Making Democracy Work (Princeton: Princeton, 1993), p. 149.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    See S. White, Political Culture and Soviet Politics (New York: St. Martins, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Also see R.C. Tucker, Political Culture and Leadership in Soviet Russia (New York: W.W Norton, 1987).Google Scholar
  9. 15.
    See J. Hahn, ‘Continuity and Change in Russian Political Culture’, British Journal of Political Science, 21 (1991), 393–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. See also J. Gibson, R. Duch and K. Tedin, ‘Democratic Values and the Transformation of the Soviet Union’, Journal of Politics, Vol. 54, no. 2 (May 1992), 329–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 16.
    C. Friedrich and Z. Brzezinski, Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy (Cambridge: Harvard, 1956).Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    H.G. Skilling and F. Griffiths, eds, Interest Groups in Soviet Politics (Princeton: Princeton, 1971).Google Scholar
  13. 18.
    D. Tarschys, ‘The Soviet Political System: Three Models’, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 5, no. 3 (September 1977), 287–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 20.
    S. White, ‘Political Culture in Communist States’, Comparative Politics, Vol. 16, no. 3 (April 1984), 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 24.
    A. Brown, ed., Political Culture and Communist Studies (London: Macmillan, 1984).Google Scholar
  16. 26.
    For such a study, see D. Bahry, ‘Rethinking the Social Roots of Perestroika’, Slavic Review, Vol. 52, no. 3 (Fall 1993); 512–54;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. and N. Petro, The Rebirth of Russian Democracy: An Interpretation of Political Culture (Cambridge: Harvard, 1995).Google Scholar
  18. 27.
    A. Inkeles and R. Bauer, The Soviet Citizen: Daily Life in a Totalitarian Society (Cambridge: Harvard, 1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 28.
    J. Millar, ed., Politics, Work, and Daily Life in the USSR: A Survey of Former Soviet Citizens (Cambridge: Cambridge, 1987).Google Scholar
  20. 29.
    W. DiFrancesco and S. Gitelman, ‘Soviet Political Culture and “Covert Participation” in Policy Implementation’, American Political Science Review, Vol. 78, no. 3 (September 1984), 603–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 30.
    P. Roeder, ‘Modernization and Participation in the Leninist Development Strategy’, American Political Science Review, Vol. 83, no. 3 (September 1989), 859–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 31.
    T. Friedgut, ‘The Soviet Citizen’s Perceptions of Local Government’, in E. Jacobs, ed., Soviet Local Politics and Government (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1983), pp. 113–31.Google Scholar
  23. 32.
    J. Hahn, Soviet Grassroots: Citizen Participation in Local Soviet Government (Princeton: Princeton, 1988).Google Scholar
  24. 33.
    S. Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale, 1968);Google Scholar
  25. Roeder, ‘Modernization and Participation’; and J. Gibson, R. Duch and K. Tedin, ‘Democratic Values and the Transformation of the Soviet Union’, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 54, no. 2 (May 1992), 329–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 34.
    M. Lewin, The Gorbachev Phenomenon (Berkeley: University of California, 1988).Google Scholar
  27. 36.
    Eckstein, ‘A Culturalist Theory of Political Change,’ American Political Science Review, Vol. 82, no. 3 (September 1988), 789–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 40.
    M. Urban, ‘The Politics of Identity in Russia’s Post Communist Transition: The Nation Against Itself’, Slavic Review, Vol. 53, no. 3 (Fall 1994), 733–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 49.
    J. Millar, Politics, Work, and Daily Life in the USSR: A Survey of Former Soviet Citizens (Cambridge: Cambridge, 1987); Eckstein, ‘A Culturalist Theory’, 796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 52.
    A. Swidler, ‘Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 51 (April 1986), 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 58.
    This table could be expanded to include market-oriented, authoritarian regimes. While political culture development would likely be in between those of the two regimes above, these regimes (recently, Chile and Argentina), are beyond this study’s scope. Comparing transitions across varying societies is fraught with difficulty. See Valerie Bunce, ‘Should Transitologists Be Grounded?’, Slavic Review, Vol. 54, no. 1 (Spring 1995), 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 60.
    P. Sorokin, Social and Cultural Change (New York: American Book Company, 1937).Google Scholar
  33. 67.
    J. Linz and A. Stepan, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© James Alexander 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northeastern State UniversityTahlequahUSA

Personalised recommendations