Abstract
The events of 7 November 1626 obviously unfolded within complex, multiple contexts.1 The following two chapters explore many of these contexts. Generally, while historians recognize that no singular context can either determine or explain historical events, they neverthess commonly distinguish and classify contexts. Most common is the distinction between those contexts which are considered ‘material’ and those which are deemed ‘ideological’, a distinction which simply reflects the established dichotomy, conceptualized variously as the difference between ‘explanation’ and ‘interpretation’, between ‘social science’ and ‘humanism’, between ‘social history’ and ‘cultural history’, and so forth. The method widely associated with Quentin Skinner, who advocates a careful distinction between practical and ideological contexts, hinges on much the same dichotomy. Moreover, Skinner’s method, inspite of a certain theoretical neatness, is difficult to implement.2 In reality, practical and ideological contexts are hopelessly intertwined, an observation which has prompted Thomas Robisheaux’s criticism of those historians of the long sixteenth century in Germany who tend to disengage matters social or cultural from the political.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2002 Johannes C.Wolfart
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wolfart, J.C. (2002). The Macro-Political Contexts in Lindau. In: Religion, Government and Political Culture in Early Modern Germany. Early Modern History Society and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230506251_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230506251_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40661-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50625-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)