Skip to main content
  • 64 Accesses

Abstract

The view of the early twentieth century historian of the Tory party, that Restoration political life was characterised by ‘a fierce un-English bitterness towards opponents …[by] personal feuds in the royal party [and by] the depravity of public as of private morals’ is still widely held, although perhaps with reservations about this behaviour being particularly ‘un-English’. To Sir Keith Feiling ‘the brand of the emigré is stamped on the generation after 1660’ and these evils were the direct consequence of the royalist emigration. They were the result of ‘a dozen years of starved dependence upon foreign courts, of political schemes divorced from any contact with political reality, of the eternal temptations besetting a party in exile, which sees its women and children hungry, and its homes in others’ hands’.2

The brand of the emigré is stamped on the generation after 1660.

(Sir Keith Feiling)1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Ibid, pp. 78–9. See also the view of Alan Marshall that the ‘exiles … had suffered, fought and plotted their way through the 1650s and Charles and his key ministers brought all these experiences into government with them: Intelligence and Espionage in the Reign of Charles II, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paul Seward, ‘The Restoration 1660–1668’, in Stuart England, ed. Blair Worden, (Oxford, 1986), p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Commons Journal, viii, 502. For examples of returned exiles listed as ‘court dependants’ see Henning, House of Commons, i, 750 (Bulteale); ii, 138 (Cotterell); 192 (Darcy); 356 (Fox); 518 (Heath); iii, 30 (Massey); 34 (Mauleverer); 35 (May); 173 (O’Neill); 238 (Phelips); 285 (Price); 294 (Progers); 343 (Robinson); 422 (Seymour); 524 (Talbot); 594 (Trelawney); 702 (Wheeler); 774 (Wyndham).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid, iii, 71–2, 142–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For Buckingham see Hutton, Charles II, passim; Hester Chapman, Great Villiers, (London, 1949). For Titus see Aylmer, The Crowns Servants, pp. 164–5; Henning, House of Commons, iii, 5 70–4; DNB.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quoted in Tomalin, Pepys, p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Somers Tracts, vii, 390–3; CCISP, iv, 629–30; Keeble, Restoration, pp. 58–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For recent discussions of this issue see Keeble, Restoration, pp. 85–9; Aylmer, The Crowns Servants, pp. 264–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pepys Diary, v, 56. (22 February 1664).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sir Charles Berkeley was created Viscount Fitzhardinge in 1663 and Earl of Falmouth in 1665. ‘Hamilton’ probably refers to one of the courtier and professional soldier sons of the Irish royalist Sir George Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For Fox’s loyalty to Clarendon see Clay, Public Finance and Private Wealth, pp. 11–16, 117–18. For Coventry’s see 011ard, Clarendon and His Friends, pp. 286, 345.

    Google Scholar 

  12. NP, ii, 25, 217; Clarendon, Rebellion, i, 96, 97, 98; Life, i, 615; ii, 191; Halkett and Fanshawe Memoirs, p. 140; 011ard, Clarendon and His Friends, pp. 171–3; Hutton, Charles II, p. 144; Seaward, Cavalier Parliament, pp. 84–5, 217–21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. BL. Harleian MS 1843, fols. 3–7; CSPD 1663–1664, p. 2; Henning, House of Commons, iii, 524. For numerous examples of petitions to Ormonde for places in the royal household and for offices in Ireland see Bod. L. Carte MS 31, passim.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bod. L. Carte MS 32, fols. 346–7, and passim. For O’Neill’s role as an intermediary between Charles and Ormonde see Alan Marshall, The Age ofFaction: Court Politics 1660–1702, (Manchester University Press, 1999), p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  15. CSP Ireland 1663–1665, pp. 633, 640, 641; 1666–1669, pp. 391, 456–7; Letters to Sir Joseph Williamson, ed. W. D. Christie, Camden Soc., (London, 1874), 2 vols., ii, 24. Arlington and Lord Ossory, Ormonde’s eldest son, were married to the daughters of Louis of Orange-Nessau, whom they had met when they were in exile.

    Google Scholar 

  16. CSPD 1661–1662, pp. 86, 276, 284, 458; 1663–1664, pp. 67, 343; 1667–1688, p. 543; 1673–1675, pp. 108; CSP Ireland 1663–1665, pp. 87, 91, 268, 301, 640–1, 654; 1669–1670, pp. 65, 161, 163, 281. For examples of O’Neill’s correspondence with Ormonde see Bod. L. Carte MS 32, fols. 3, 9, 23, 26, 312, 405; for Henry Coventry to Ormonde see BL. Add. MS 25125, fols. 59, 61, 65.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carte, Letters and Papers, i, 155; HMC, 10th Report, iv, 147; CSPD 1655, pp. 204, 588; NP, iii, 5; iv, 20; Keeler, Long Parliament, p. 142; Barbour, Arlington, p. 7; Balleine, All for the King, p. 78; Henning, House of Commons, ii, 134–5, 172; iii, 257, 294.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Graham Parry, ‘Minds and Manners 1660–1688’, in Stuart England, ed. Blair Worden, p. 176. See also Keeble, Restoration, pp. 171–82.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid, pp. 176–8; Fraser, King Charles II, pp. 153, 280–4; Underdown, Royalist Conspiracy, pp. 59, 75–6, 81–2, 333.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Henning, House of Commons, iii, 237–8, 421–2, (Phelips and Seymour); Newman, Royalist Officers, p. 285 (Phelips); Aylmer, The Crowns Servants, p. 164 (Titus).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Blague was a friend of Gerard and the correspondence of Nicholas and Hatton sometimes associates him with the group around Gerard who attempted to undermine Hyde’s position as the king’s chief adviser. NP, ii, 151, 157; CC1SP, iii, 115.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Memorials of the Holles Family, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  23. For Bab May see CC1SP, i, 445, ii, 304; HMC, Bath MSS, ii, 97; CSPD 1651–1652, p. 143; Aylmer, ‘Patronage at the Court of Charles II’, in the Stuart Courts, ed. Eveline Cruickshanks, (Sutton Publishing, 2000), p. 196; Henning, The House of Commons, iii, 35–6; Aylmer, The Crowns Servants, p. 25. For Hugh May see CSPD 1655, p. 582; 1661–1662, p. 275; H. M. Colvin, A Biographical Dictionary of English Architects 1660–1840, (London, 1954) pp. 382–3.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Quotations from Cregan ‘Daniel O’Neill in Exile and Restoration’, p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pepys quoted in Hardacre ‘Royalists in Exile’, p. 370; Edward Hyde, Earl of Clarendon, A Collection of Several Tracts, (Oxford, 1727), p. 336.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Geoffrey Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, G. (2003). The Brand of the Emigré. In: The Cavaliers in Exile 1640–1660. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505476_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505476_14

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51071-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50547-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics