Skip to main content

Conceptualising Peace

  • Chapter
The Transformation of Peace

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

Abstract

A number of different strategies for conceptualising peace have emerged in the intellectual and policy discourses examined in the previous chapters of this study. There appears to have been an evolution in approaches to dealing with conflict and constructing peace, which has moved away from the notion that peace was geographically contained, or contained and constructed by race, identity, or power, and also away from the notion that universal peace was an unlikely achievement. What seems to have developed is an understanding of a certain version of peace — the liberal peace — as being universal and also as being attainable, if the correct methods are concertedly and consistently applied by a plethora of different actors working on the basis of an agreed peacebuilding consensus, and focusing on the regimes, structures, and institutions required at multiple levels of analysis and in multiple issue areas by liberal governance. This development is a hybrid form related to the main strands of thinking about peace outlined earlier in this study, including the victor’s peace, constitutional, institutional, and civil approaches, and there exist both ‘thick’ and ‘thin’ versions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. John G. Ikenberry, AfterVictory, Princeton UP, 2001, p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, among others, Richard Falk, On Humane Governance, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995; Andrew Linklater, The Transformation of Political Community, University of South Carolina Press, 1998; Vivienne Jabri, Discourses on Violence, MUP, 1996, pp. 145–67.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sun Tzu, ‘The Use of Spies’, The Art of War. XIII, London: Penguin, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin Ceadal, ThinkingAboutPeace and War, Oxford: OUP, 1987, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For example, see Roland Paris, At Wars End, CUP, 2004, p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen, The West, Civil Society, and the Construction of Peace, London: Palgrave, 2003, p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For more on this see Mark Duffield, Global Governance and the New Wars, London: Zed, 2001, p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See James Rosenau, ‘Governance, Order and Change in World Politics’ in James Rosenau and Ernst-Otto Czempiel (eds), Governance without Government, CUP, 1992, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For more on this, see Johan Galtung, Peace By Peaceful Means Peace And Conflict, Development And Civilization, London Sage, 1996, p. viii.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See in particular Thomas Risse-Kappen, ‘Collective Identity in a Democratic Community’, in Peter Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia UP, pp. 357–99.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Rob Walker, Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993; David Campbell, Writing Security, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. This is outlined in Robert Keohane’s famous paper, ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’, in International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1988, p. 384.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid., pp. 379–396.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See in particular, Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of Politics, CUP, 2000: Thomas Rise-Kappen, ‘Ideas do not float freely’, International Organisation, Vol. 48, No. 2, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vivienne Jabri, Discourses on Violence, MUP, 1996, pp. 145–67.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Richard Shapcott, ‘Cosmopolitan Conversations’, Global Society, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2002, p. 222.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., p. 222.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stephen Hopgood, ‘Reading the Small Print in Global Civil Society’, Millennium, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2000, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Habermas, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Cambridge: Polity, 1990, p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R.J. Rummel, The Just Peace, California: Sage, 1981, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Raymond C. Kelly, Warless Societies and the Origins of War, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000, p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Oliver P. Richmond

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richmond, O.P. (2005). Conceptualising Peace. In: The Transformation of Peace. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505070_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics