Abstract
In the major studies of Bolshevism and of Lenin’s career and political thought, little attention has been paid to the question of Machiavelli’s influence. There are two notable exceptions to this trend — Alain Besançon and Kosta Cavoski. Even those who provide a convincing picture of Lenin as the revolutionary Machiavellian politician par excellence, such as Walicki, shy away from using the term or of exploring more closely the relationship between Lenin and Machiavelli.1 There are various explanations for this silence. First, this was an aspect of Bolshevism that Lenin and other leaders understandably preferred to keep quiet about. Second, the cynical and manipulative aspects of Leninist and Bolshevik practices, which are by and large universally recognized, might be derived either from other intellectual sources — the Russian revolutionary tradition, from Marx and Engels, from the tradition of Jacobinism and Blanquism, or derived from circumstances and the psychological disposition of the Bolsheviks as a conspiratorial party. Third, this was a question considered politically sensitive and best avoided, reflecting a view that equated Machiavelli simply with perfidy in politics, ignoring the strong argument that Machiavelli might be seen as a revolutionary thinker in his own right.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2004 E. A. Rees
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rees, E.A. (2004). The Bolsheviks, Lenin and Machiavelli. In: Political Thought from Machiavelli to Stalin. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505001_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505001_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51577-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50500-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)