Abstract
In the previous chapter, we presented a systematic way of using the firm’s knowledge to improve the service rendered to the customer. In this particular case, it was a procedure in the form of an improvement project - that is, a one-off event within the firm’s life. But how can this approach be transformed into a permanent improvement system? At first sight, the answer might be: ‘Well, let’s carry out the method once a day.’ However, when put into practice in this manner, the process suffers from two basic drawbacks:
-
1.
The preparation is costly. Any knowledge identification process, discovery of moments of truth, and the like, that is needed to arrive at a list of actions, is time-consuming. To perform it every day is costly. But, on top of that, it is redundant. Because, unless drastic changes are made within the firm, we will discover the same knowledge that we had the previous day. And in the process, we will perform that wondrous act of carrying out a costly process that contributes nothing new. This is logical, because knowledge is only changed by our actions and subsequent learning. However, in one day, not enough time will have passed to perform actions that change the knowledge base. One possible modification is to lengthen the time between analyses. However, now the opposite effect happens. If we lengthen it too much, we will miss opportunities because the knowledge is not detected when it is generated.
-
2.
It is a system of plans. The outcome of the process is an action plan consisting of a sequence of actions that encompass a not insignificant time period. The plan represents a commitment to future action by the individuals involved, sanctioned by the firm’s management. This has three effects. First, it gives the plan an internal application logic, with precedents and synergies between activities. Generally speaking, it is difficult to separate the plan into individual actions that can be performed concurrently by the agents and which can be generated by each agent in the course of interacting with his daily work environment. Second, the plan must be reviewed by consensus and iteration. With this method, it is unlikely that each agent will have the initiative to change actions as problems are detected. The result of the analysis is both too detailed - with too many coordinated actions - and too broad to enable rapid review of the plans. And lastly, in order to assess actions, they must all be available and have been described in sufficient detail.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abernathy, W.C. and Clark, K.B. ‘Innovation: Mapping the Winds of Creative Destruction’. Research Policy, 114, 1985, 3–22.
Alder, H. The Right-Brain Manager. Piatkus, 1993.
Amabile, T. ‘How to Kill Creativity’. Harvard Business Review, September-October 1998.
Argyris, C. Organizational Learning: a Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley, 1978.
Argyris, C. Overcoming Organizational Defenses: Facilitating Organizational Learning. Allyn and Bacon, 1990.
Argyris, C. ‘Teaching Smart People How to Learn’. Harvard Business Review, 6(3), 1991, 99–109.
Argyris, C. Knowledge for Action. Jossey-Bass, 1993.
Boden, M.A. La Mente Creativa, Mitos y Mecanismos. Gedisa, 1994.
Burgelman, R. and Maidique, M. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. CRC Press, 1988.
Crawford, R.P. The Techniques of Creative Thinking. Prentice Hall, 1954.
Dartnall, T. (ed.), Artificial Intelligence and Creativity. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
De Bono, E. Lateral Thinking. Penguin Books, 1977.
De Bono, E. Serious Creativity: Using the Power of Lateral Thinking to Create New Ideas. Advanced Practical Thinking, 1993.
De Treville, S. ‘Disruption, Learning and System Improvement in JIT Manufacturing’. Thesis GSB, Harvard University, 1987.
Doheny-Farina, S. Rhetoric, Innovation, Technology. MIT Press, 1992.
Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B. and Smith, S.M. Creative Cognition: Theory, Research and Application. MIT Press, 1992.
Goldner, B.B. The Strategy of Creative Thinking. Prentice Hall, 1962.
Guilford, J.P. Cognitive Psychology with a Frame of Reference. Edits. Publishers, 1979.
Hamel, G. ‘Bringing Silicon Valley Inside’. Harvard Business Review, September-October 1999.
Holyoak, K. and Thagard, P. Mental Leaps. MIT Press, 1996.
Kao, J. Jamming. Harper Business, 1996.
Kim, S.H. Essence of Creativity: a Guide to Tackling Difficult Problems. Oxford University Press, 1990.
Lumsdaine, E. and Lumsdaine, M. Creative Problem Solving. McGraw-Hill, 1995.
Mackay, D.M. Information, Mechanism and Meaning. MIT Press, 1969.
Mcfadzean, E. ‘The Creativity Continuum: Towards a Classification of Creative Problem Solving Techniques’. Creativity and Innovation Management, September 1998.
Michalko, M. Thinkertoys. Ten Speed Press, 1991.
Muñoz-Seca, B. ‘Training for Continuous Improvement in the Firms and its Operations’. PhD thesis. University of Navarre, 1992.
Nadler, G. and Hibino, S. Breakthrough Thinking. Prima Publishing, 1992.
Nonaka, LA. ‘Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation’. Organization Science, 5 (February), 1994, 14–37.
Pérez López, J.A. Teoría de laAcción Humana en las Organizaciones: la acción personal. Rialp, 1991.
Ray, M. and Myers, R. Creativity in Business. Doubleday, 1989.
Rickards, T. Problem Solving Through Creative Analysis. Gower Press, 1974.
Scott, G. The Empowered Mind: How to Harness the Creative Force Within You. Prentice Hall Trade, 1994.
Turner, C.C. The Creative Process. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, 1994.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Beatriz Muñoz-Seca and Josep Riverola
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Muñoz-Seca, B., Riverola, J. (2004). Knowledge Generation. In: Problem-Driven Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504509_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504509_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52076-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50450-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)