Abstract
When Donne compares parted lovers to a pair of compasses he shows with singular clarity what separation in love is like. Love’s symmetry is conveyed by an idea transferred from science. We are led to think of the image as operating almost as a demonstration. And yet there is nothing miraculous in this, for the response it evokes is dependent on our having grasped the metaphor’s detailed logic. So, Donne’s concluding lines, Thy firmness draws my circle just, And makes me end, where I begunne’,1 reveal the certitude of love, the absolute confidence in the other that transcends time and distance. Donne’s metaphor also tells us something of the limits of love. For the movements of the arms of the compass imply balance and proportion, a harmony of purpose which in the hands of love strongly suggest a power of endurance and likeness of perception that reach well beyond familiarity or the mere toleration of differences. Tf they be two, they are two so/As stiffe twin compasses are two.’.2 Donne’s formulation asks us to believe that the hallmark of love is not just the presence of parallel feelings, but their mutual implanting. Where unison is absent, love is deficient, falsely imagined, or stillborn.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
John Donne, A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning, in John Donne, Complete Poetry and Selected Prose, edited by John Hayward, (London: The Nonesuch Press, 1936), p. 37.
A. E. Denham, Metaphor and Moral Experience, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000), p. 338.
Martha C. Nussbaum, ‘Why Practice Needs Ethical Theory: Particularism, Perception, and Bad Behavior’, in S. Burton, editor, The Legacy of Oliver Wendell Holmes: ‘The Path of the Law’ and its Influence, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 76.
Martha Nussbaum, ‘Equilibrium: Scepticism and Immersion in Political Deliberation’, Acta Philosophica Fennica, 64 (1999) 181.
M. Sandel, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), p. 47.
J. Conrad, Heart of Darkness, (London: Dent, 1923), p. 82.
John Rawls, Justice as Fairness, A Restatement, edited by Erin Kelly, (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2001), p. 29.
D. Z. Phillips, Philosophy’s Cool Place, (London: Cornell University Press, 1999), pp. 145ff.
Martha C. Nussbaum, ‘Aristotle, Politics and Human Capabilities’, Ethics, 111 (2000) 116.
Cora Diamond, The Realistic Spirit, (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1991), p. 376.
V. S. Pritchett, Complete Collected Essays, (New York: Random House, 1991), p. 75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Peter Johnson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johnson, P. (2004). The Novel and Ethical Reflection. In: Moral Philosophers and the Novel. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503373_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503373_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51669-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50337-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)