Skip to main content
  • 57 Accesses

Abstract

What could have moved Shakespeare to write as strange a play as Coriolanus? A play where he made no attempt to engage the audience as in his earlier tragedies, where he dispensed with many of the essentials of tragedy as he himself had come to see it, the inward-looking hero, the metaphysical interest, the supernatural, the spiritualised emotions. Instead of continuing to work in this successful framework he tried out a different kind of tragedy, one that includes the most difficult crowd-scenes in the canon (plebeians, soldiers, citizens, senators, Volscians, all ‘crowds’ with their own identities), more tumult and sheer brute-human noise than perhaps accords with tragic thoughtfulness, and, strangest of all, an entirely new tragic tone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Dover Wilson (ed.), Antony and Cleopatra (Cambridge, 195o) p. xxx.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. P. Riemer, A Reading of Shakespeares ‘Antony and Cleopatra’ (Sydney, 1968) p. 15, surveying ‘the traditional body of attitudes that had accumulated around the lovers’, declared that Shakespeare’s ‘passages of comedy … find no sanction at all in these traditions.’ Shakespeare’s passages are largely his own, of course, but Plutarch told him that jesting had an important place in Antony’s life.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Compare Eugene M. Waith, The Herculean Hero (1962); Reuben A. Brower, Hero & Saint: Shakespeare and the Graeco-Roman Heroic Tradition (Oxford, 1971); Dover Wilson (quoted above, p. 15o); and, as an example of a mixed response, Riemer, A Reading of Shakespeares ‘Antony and Cleopatra’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2002 E.A.J. Honigmann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Honigmann, E.A.J. (2002). The Clarity of Coriolanus . In: Shakespeare: Seven Tragedies Revisited. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503038_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics