Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Southampton Studies in International Policy ((SSIP))

  • 63 Accesses

Abstract

With the creation of the United Nations Operation in Mozambique (ONUMOZ) in December 1992, the UN had established its thirteenth peacekeeping operation of the post-Cold War era. Thus, in only four years the UN had equaled the number of operations it had conducted during the previous 40. However, the optimism that had been generated in the initial post-Cold War period was now beginning to waver. As described in the previous chapter, democratic elections in Angola had been followed by a return to war and many analysts were blaming the UN’s failure to disarm UNITA for the ease with which it had resumed. At the same time, the refusal of the Khmer Rouge to disarm and participate in elections in Cambodia was placing that country’s whole peace process in jeopardy. It was to be in this climate of dejection and uncertainty that the peace negotiations for Mozambique were to conclude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. A. Vines, RENAMO: From Terrorism to Democracy in Mozambique (Villiers Publications, 1996) p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. Brittain, ‘Rebel Group Strangles Quarter of Mozambique’, The Guardian, 3 August 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Elliot, ‘Debts Fetter World’s Police Force’, The Guardian, 13 May 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.J. Puchala, ‘Outsiders, Insiders and UN Reform’, Washington Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 4 (1994) p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Bridgland, ‘Shoestring Peace About to Snap’, Sunday Telegraph, 21 February 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Alden, ‘The UN and the Resolution of Conflict in Mozambique’, Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1, 114–15.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Hamlyn, ‘1’oll Raises Mozambican Fears’, The Times, 21 October 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Alden, ‘Swords into Ploughshares? The UN and Demilitarization in Mozambique’, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 2, No. 2 (1995) pp. 179–80.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.B. Oakley, M.J. Dziedzic and E.M. Goldberg (eds), Policing the New World Disorder: Peace Operations and Public Security (Washington D.C.: National Defense University Press, 1998) p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Crawford, ‘Mozambique’s Fragile Peace Process Risks Too Easy Derailment’, Financial Times, 25 January 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Beresford, ‘Final Lap for UN’s Man in Maputo’, The Guardian, 26 October 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B.F. Walter, ‘Designing Transitions from Civil War’, in B.F. Walter and J. Snyder (eds), Civil Wars, Insecurity and Intervention (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999) p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Kurzidem, ‘ONUMOZ- How To Make A Successful Peacekeeping Operation’, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 1, No. 4 (1994) p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Stephen M. Hill

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hill, S.M. (2005). Mozambique 1992–1994. In: United Nations Disarmament Processes in Intra-State Conflict. Southampton Studies in International Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502963_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics