Skip to main content

Devolution to Scotland and Wales — is ‘Power Devolved, Power Retained’?

  • Chapter
Constitution-Making and the Labour Party
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

I must begin by attempting to limit my field somewhat. There is a rich historical literature on the study of regional devolution in the (dis)United Kingdom and Ireland in the 19th century which explores such issues as the 50 years of the Irish Home Rule controversy from 1870 to 1920 when the issue was one of first-rate political and constitutional importance.1 There is also an important literature on nationalism as a perennial problem within socialist theory and practice in the late 19th and early 20th century.2 Both literatures provide an important historical backdrop to current political debate on devolution and nationalisms. Both literatures remain outside the scope of this chapter. This chapter mainly focuses on key moments and themes in post-war Labour Party history with regard to the devolution issue in Scotland and Wales. This is not because the pre-war experience lacks important lessons and understandings which could help us to make sense of recent developments under the Labour government, but because the postwar period provides a rich source for study in itself.

For forms of government let fools contest: Whater is best administered is best.

Alexander Pope, Essay on Man, Epistle 111, lines 303–4.

We saidtrust the peopleand we did trust the people, and the people have had the courage and the confidence to trust themselves...The era of big, centralized government is over! I believe we have the chance to build a modern constitution for this country, for the United Kingdom, that will see us through into the next century, proud of our history, but determined to live in the future.

Tony Blair, 1997.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. N. Mansergh’s, The Irish Question, 1840–1921 (London: Unwin, 1965) and J.C. Beckett’s, The Making of Modern Ireland, 1603–1923 (London: Faber, 1969) are the seminal texts written from this perspective.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See D. Howell’s, A Lost Left (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Fry’s Patronage and Principle (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 2nd edition 1991) provides a full discussion of the politics of devolution in this period.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L.G. Gibbon, A Scots Quair (London: Penguin, 1986). introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For example see J Kendle(’s Fedral Britain London Rnntladge 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Mitchell, ‘Devolution(’, in W. Wale (ed.), Developments in Politics Volume 5 (Ormskirk: Causeway Press. 19941_ n. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Greenleaf, The British Political Tradition: Volume 3, A Much Governed Nation (London. Methuen. 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Harvie, Scotland and Nationalism: Scottish Society and Politics 1707–1994 (London, Routledge, 2nd edition, 1994), p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See J. Mitchell, ‘Reviving the Union State? The devolution debate in Scotland(’, Politics Review, Vol. 5 (1996a), 1, pp. 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Harvie in A. Dickson and J.H. Treble (eds.), People and Society in Scotland Vol. III 1 91 4–1 990 (Edinburgh: John Donald, 1992), p. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morrison quoted in K.O. Morgan, Rebirth of a Nation: Wales 1880–1980 (Oxford: OUP, 1986), p. 377.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The village of Capel Celyn and the Tryweryn valley near Bala were drowned in 1965 in order to supply water for the City of Liverpool through the creation of the Llyn Celyn (Celyn lake) reservoir. Twelve farms and land belonging to four other farms were drowned. The Tryweryn Bill was passed by Parliament on 1 August 1957. This was a private measure, sponsored by Liverpool City Council and passed by Harold Macmillan’s Conservative government, with the support of Henry Brooke, the Minister for Welsh Affairs. The measure allowed for the compulsory purchase of land to build the reservoir. The scheme was opposed by most of the Welsh Members of Parliament, but they were powerless to stop the development because the government was determined to push the Bill through Parliament. The local authorities did not have a voice in the decision either and this caused great resentment. See http://www.11gc.org.uk/ymgyrchu/Dwr/TRyweryn/index-e.htm for a full discussion.

  13. Named the Kilbrandon Report after Lord Crowther’s successor Lord Kilbrandon.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For example, see A. Marr, Ruling Brittania: the failure and future of British democracy (London: Penguin, 1996) and A. Marr, The Day Britain Died (London: Prof ile, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. Bogdanor, Devolution (Oxford: OUP, 1979), p. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See E. Hobsbawm, ‘Some Reflections on ‘The Break-up of Britain(’, New Left Review, 105 (1977), pp. 3–24 for a critique of Nairn’s thesis and A. Marr’s, The Day Britain Died (London: Prof ile, 2000) for a more recent but similar thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  17. David Coates discusses these regional disparities in Running the Country (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. See D. Burns, Poll Tax Rebellion (Stirling: AK Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Butler, et al’s, Failure in British Government. The Politics of the Poll Tax, Oxford, OUP, 1994) is the seminal account of the Poll Tax.

    Google Scholar 

  20. House of Commons, The Scotland Bill: Some Constitutional and Representational Aspects, Research Paper 98/3, 8 January 1998 (London: HMSO, 1998), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See R. Harris, The Making of Neil Kinnock (London: Faber, 1985) for a broad discussion.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See A. Thomas, ‘The Moment of Truth: Labour’s Welsh Assembly Proposals in Practice’, paper presented to the 1996 Political Studies Association Annual Conference, University of Glasgow (University of Glamorgan: Business School, 1996), for a detailed account.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Kearney’s, Post-Nationalist Ireland (London: Routledge, 1997), presents a provocative account of a post-nationalist Ireland using this argument. See Chapter Ten for a broader discussion.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wales Labour Party, ‘Wales and Europe: Towards a Closer Relationship(’, Interim Report of the Policy Commission (Llandudno: Wales Labour Party, 1993), para.5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Osmond’s, The Democratic Challenge (Llandysul: Gomer Press, 1992) provides an interesting discussion of the European dimension of the case for Welsh devolution.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wales Labour Party, ‘The Future of Local Government in Wales’ (Llandudno: Wales Labour Party, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wales Labour Party, ‘Shaping the Vision: Consultation Document’ (Llandudno: Wales Labour Party, 1994). See R. Deacon, ‘New Labour and the Welsh Assembly: “Shaping the Vision” or Updating the Wales Act 1978?(’, in I. Hampsher Monk and J. Stanyer (eds.), Contemporary Political Studies 1996 Volume One (Glasgow: PSA, 1996), for a full account.

    Google Scholar 

  28. House of Commons, The Commons Committee Stage ofConstitutionalBills, Research Paper 97/53, 20 May 1997 (London: HMSO, 1997), pp. 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Labour Party, New Labour: because Britain deserves better (London, Labour Party. 1997), pp. 33–4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See P. Anderson, English Questions (London: Verso, 1992), for a full discussion.

    Google Scholar 

  31. House of Commons, Devolution and Concordats, Research paper 99/84 (London: HMSO, 1999). Available on-line at: http://www.parliament.uk/commons/l ib(research/rp99/rp99–084.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Mark Evans

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evans, M. (2003). Devolution to Scotland and Wales — is ‘Power Devolved, Power Retained’?. In: Constitution-Making and the Labour Party. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502260_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics