Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter has two parts. Part one explores the misfit between constitutional theory and political practice in the UK. It argues that a historic fusion of constitutional pressures that emerged in the 1980s and ‘90’s created the political space for the emergence of a New Constitutionalism under the Blair government. For analytical purposes these pressures may be distinguished between structural and political factors. The former are changes in global forces, national statecraft (the principles of governing) and the nature of domestic governance (the process of governing). The latter are the political manifestations of these broader structural changes. The purpose here is to present a map of the myriad of constitutional pressures that emerged in the 1980s and ‘90’s. These will be discussed at greater length in relation to particular processes of constitutional reform in Part II of the book.

We on the centre-left must try to put ourselves at the forefront of those who are trying to manage social change in the global economy. The old left resisted that change. The new right did not want to manage it. We have to manage that change to produce social solidarity and prosperity.

Tony Blair, 1998.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. This argument was developed in collaboration with Philip Cerny and I have drawn on some of his ideas in the development of this chapter. See P. Cerny and M. Evans, ‘New Labour, Globalization and the Competition State(’, Harvard Papers, 60, Center for European Studies (Harvard: Harvard University, 2000) and M. Evans and P. Cerny, ‘Globalization and Social Policy’ in N. Ellison and C. Pierson (eds), Developments in British Social Policy 2 (London: Palgrave, 2003), pp. 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For an alternative account see A. Callinicos, Against the Third Way (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See P. Cerny, ‘International Finance and the Erosion of State Capacity’ in P. Gummett (ed.), Globalization and Public Policy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996), pp. 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See W. Hutton, Stake-holding and its Critics (London: Institute of Economic Affairs Health and Welfare Unit, 1997) for a more developed presentation of the concept of stake-holding.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Beetham, (ed.), Defining and Measuring Democracy (London: Sage, 1994), provides the classic example of this development.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Davies, The Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust and Political Democracy (York: Department of Politics. University of York 2001) D. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Smith’s, The Rise and Full of Monetarism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987) provides an interview of the disastrous effects of monetarism

    Google Scholar 

  8. See R. Jowell, J. Curtice, L. Brook and K. Thomson (eds), British Social Attitude: The Thirteenth Report (Aldershot Dartmouth 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. See D. Oliver, Government in the United Kingdom (Milton Keynes: Open University Press. 1992) D. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For a discussion of these issues see J. Buller, M. Evans and O. James (eds), ‘Understanding the Europeanisation of Public Policy(’, special edition of Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 17 (2002), 2, pp. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Landrech, ‘Europeanization of Domestic Politics and Institutions: the Case of France(’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 32 (1994), D. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For a thorough discussion of the issues involved see S. Weir and D. Beetham, Political Power and Democratic Control in Britain (London: Routledge, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Campbell’s, Edward Heath (London: Jonathan Cape, 1993) presents an excellent discussion of the fall of the Heath administration at the hands of organized labour.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For example, the Community Charge and Child Support policy. On the former see D. Butler, A. Adonis and T. Travers, Failure in British Government. The Politics of the Poll Tax, (Oxford: OUP, 1994), and on the latter see J. Lewis, ‘Women, Men and the Family’ in A. Seldon (ed.) The Blair Effect (London: Little Brown, 2001), pp. 489–506.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Postmaterialism is a concept that refers to the transformation of value priorities in western democracies from materialist to postmaterialist values. It is argued that a relationship exists between this culture shift and the emergence of new social and political movements. See R. Inglehart, Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies (Princeton: Princetnn I Inivercitv Precc 19901

    Google Scholar 

  16. See M. Evans, ‘Political Participation(’, in P. Dunleavy et al (eds), Developments in British Politics 5 (London: Macmillan, 1997) and H. Margetts, ‘Political Participation and Protest(’, in Developments in British Politics 6 (London: Macmillan. 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  17. See C. Lindlom, Politics and Markets (London: Basic Books, 1977), for a full discussion.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Strange. Casino Canitalism (Oxford: Blackwell. 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Neil Gordon Kinnock (1942- ): Labour MP for Bedwellty, 1970–83 and Islwyn, 1983–95; member of the Commons public expenditure, nationalised industries, and European legislation select committees, 1970–9; parliamentary private secretary to the employment secretary, 1974–5; Labour’s chief education spokesman, 1979; joined shadow cabinet 1980; member of Labour’s national executive committee 1978–94; Labour party leader 1983–1992; European commissioner for Transport 1 995–9; vice-president of the European Commission, 1999- .

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. Jones. Remakin the Labour Partv (London: Routledee_ 19961)

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Panitch and C. Leys, The End of Parliamentary Socialism. From New Left to New Labour (London: Verso. 1997). ch. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  22. John Smith (1938–94): Labour MP for Lanarkshire North, 1970–83 and Monklands East, 1983–94; Secretary of State for Trade, 1978–9; shadow Chancellor, 1989–92; and, leader of the Labour Party, 1992–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See J. Geekie and R. Levy, ‘Devolution and the Tartanization of the Labour Party(’, Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 42 (1989), 3, pp. 399–411.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peter Mandelson (1953- ): Labour MP for Hartlepool, 1992- ; author of The Blair Revolution (with Roger Liddle), 1996; 1997 Election Campaign Manager, 1996–7; Minister without Portfolio, 1998; Secretary of State for the Department of Trade and Industry, 1998; Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, 1999–2000. Mandelson has been forced to resign from ministerial posts twice since 1997. In 1999 he resigned when it was revealed that he had borrowed and failed to register a loan from fellow cabinet minister Geof frey Robinson. After a short cooling of f period he was reinstated as Northern Ireland Secretary. However, he was forced to resign once again in 2000 after being falsely accused of exchanging British passports in return for party donations. He remains a Labour backbencher.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gordon Brown (1951- ): Labour MP for Dunfermline East, 1983-; Opposition Spokesman on Trade and Industry 1985–7; Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury 1987–9; Shadow Trade and Industry Secretary 1989–92; Shadow Chancellor 1992–7; Chancellor of the Exchequer 1997- .

    Google Scholar 

  26. See W. Bonefeld and P. Burnham, ‘The Politics of Counter Inflationary Credibility in Britain, 1990–94(’, Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 30. (1998). 1. nn. 32–52.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Leadbeater. Living on Thin Air (London. 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J R. Macdonald, Syndicalism (London, 1912), pp. 68–9. See Chapter Five for a biography of Macdonald.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Giddens, The Third Way: the Renewal of Social Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998), p. vii.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See also: A. Giddens, Runaway World (London: Prof ile Books, 1999); A. Giddens, The Third Way and Its Critics (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000); A. Giddens, Where Now for New Labour? (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002); A. Giddens (ed.), The Global Third Way Debate (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001); and, A. Callinicos, Against the Third Way (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  31. For the most compelling critique see A. Callinicos, Against the Third Way (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001). For a supporting perspective see J. Isaac, ‘Intellectuals, Marxism and Politics(’, New Left Review 11, 2 (2000), p. 11. For his response see, Third Way and Its Critics (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000). On the influence of Giddens on the global debate see A. Giddens (ed.), The Global Third Way Debate (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  32. T Rlair. The Third Wnv tT.nncinn• Pahian Rnrietv 199R1

    Google Scholar 

  33. For example, compare R. McKenzie and D. Lee, Quicksilver Capital: fHow the Rapid Movement of Wealth Has Changed the World (New York: Free Press, 1991), with R. Reich, The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21 st Century Capitalism (New York: Knopf, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  34. For example, compare P. Hirst and G. Thompson, Globalization In Question? The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance (Oxford. Polity Press, 1996) with G. Garrett, Partisan Politics in the Global Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  35. See P. Cerny, The Changing Architecture of Politics: Structure, Agency and the Future of the State (London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1990) and P. Cerny and M. Evans, ‘New Labour, Globalization and the Competition State(’, Harvard Papers, 60, Center for European Studies (Harvard: Harvard University, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  36. See: B. Jessop et al, Marxism and Democracy (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1980); and, J. Dearlove, ‘Bringing the Constitution Back In: Political Science and the State(’, Political Studies, 37 (1989), 3, pp. 521–39.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See David Marquand, The Unprincipled Society (London: Cape, 1988) and Will Hutton, The State Were In (London: Cape, 1995), for two perspectives on this theme.

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. Smith and D. Richards provide a rigorous discussion of the theory and practice of governance in the UK in Governance and Public Policy in the UK (Oxford• Oxford University Press 20011 chs 2 and 10

    Google Scholar 

  39. See S. Vogel, Freer Markets, More Ru1es: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  40. See S. Hall, ‘Authoritarian Populism: A Reply(’, New Left Review, 151 (1985), pp. 115–24 and B. Jessop et al., Thatcherism: A Tale of Two Nations (London: Polity, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  41. A term coined by W.J.M. Mackenzie in Explorations in Government (London: Macmillan, 1975, p. 275).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Free Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Mark Evans

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evans, M. (2003). The Rise of the Competition State. In: Constitution-Making and the Labour Party. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502260_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics