Skip to main content

Chastity in the Stocks: Women, Sex, and Marriage in Ane Satyre of the Thrie Estaitis

  • Chapter
Woman and the Feminine in Medieval and Early Modern Scottish Writing

Abstract

In an article entitled ‘Normative Heterosexuality in History and Theory: The Case of Sir David Lindsay of the Mount’, R. James Goldstein argues that, while modern scholars have usefully ‘examined Lindsay’s work in the context of the political and theological conflicts of his time, they have paid little attention to the relations among power, gender, and sexuality that pervade his work’. He notes further that, throughout this extraordinary body of work, ‘Lindsay is conspicuously preoccupied by proper defmitions of gender and the regulation of sexual desire’.1 Those preoccupations are rendered especially conspicuous in his sprawling morality play, The Satyre of the Thrie Estaitis: exemplars of proper and improper sexual and gendered behaviour are given names, lines, and costumes, and placed onstage. Women, however, are rendered conspicuously absent in Lindsay’s staging. This is especially notable given that, according to Henry Charteris, in 1554 the play was ‘playit besyde Edinburgh, in presence of the Quene Regent’, Mary of Guise.2 The play presents the female body as abject and grotesque, as Goldstein amply demonstrates (pp. 359–61), while keeping that body resolutely offstage. There are female roles in the play, even very lively and interesting ones, but these roles are played by men, in ways that move beyond a conventionalised theatrical cross-dressing by male actors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. James Goldstein, ‘Normative Heterosexuality in History and Theory: The Case of Sir David Lindsay of the Mount’, in Becoming Male in the Middle Ages, ed. by Jeffrey Jerome Cohen and Bonnie Wheeler (New York: Garland, 1997), p. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. Ane Satire of the Thrie Estaitis, ed. by Roderick Lyall (Edinburgh: Canongate, 1989), p. xii. All references in this paper to the play itself are to this edition, and are given parenthetically by line number.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A Satire of the Three Estates, by Sir David Lindsay, ed. by Matthew McDiannid (New York: Theatre Arts Books, 1967), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Satire of the Three Estates, by Sir David Lindsay, trans. and ed. by Robert Kemp (London: Heinemann, 1951), p. viii.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carol Edington, Court and Culture in Renaissance Scotland: Sir David Lindsay of the Mount (Amherst, MA: U Massachusetts P, 1994), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McDiarmid, pp. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Works of Sir David Lindsay of the Mount, 1490–1555, ed. by Douglas Hamer, 4 vols (Edinburgh & London: Blackwood, 1936), IV, 202, n. I. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greg Walker, The Politics of Performance in Early Renaissance Drama (Cambridge: CUP, 1998), p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The English stage directions of the Cornish Creation play (dated 1611 in the manuscript), for instance, refer to ‘Adam and Eva aparlet in whytt lether’ (1. 343); see The Creacion of the World: A Critical Edition and Translation, ed. by Paula Neuss (New York & London: Garland, 1983), p. 28. On stage nakedness in this and other plays, see William Tydeman, ‘Costumes and Actors’, in Medieval English Drama: A Casebook, ed. by Peter Happé (London: MacMillan, 1984), pp. 183–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. All references to the works of Shakespeare are to The Norton Shakespeare, ed. by Stephen Greenblatt, and others (New York & London: Norton, 1997). The reference to Cordelia’s low voice might well be part of an elaborate joke of sorts, playing on the doubling of Cordelia and the Fool by an adult male actor, likely Robert Armin; see John C. Meagher, Shakespeares Shakespeare: How the Plays Were Made (New York: Continuum, 1997), pp. 97, 110–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See OED effeminate, adj. la, 3. This is the standard sense of the term throughout the early modern period, as exemplified by Romeo’s complaint after Mercutio’s death: ‘O sweet Juliet, /Thy love hath made me effeminate’ (Romeo and Juliet II1.1.108–9). However, like the early modern understanding of sexuality, the term is subject to slippage, and can carry a sodomitical charge; see Garrett P. J. Epp, ‘The Vicious Guise: Effeminacy, Sodomy, and Mankind’ in Becoming Male in the Middle Ages, ed. by Jeffrey Jerome Cohen and Bonnie Wheeler (New York: Garland, 1997), pp. 303–20.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ‘The Answer quhilk Schir Dauid Lindesay maid to the Kingis Flyting’, I. 49. All references to the works of David Lindsay other than The Thrie Estaitis are to Hamer’s edition, vol. 1 (1931); citations by title and line number are hereafter given parenthetically.

    Google Scholar 

  13. George Puttenham, The Arte of English Poesie, ed. by Gladys Doidge Willcock and Alice Walker (Cambridge: CUP, 1936; rep. 1970), p. 134.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Edington, p.76. Gynecocracy was, of course, a central issue in sixteenth-century England and Scotland alike. John Knox’s infamous First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women was published in 1558, only four years after the Edinburgh performance of The Thrie Estaitis and the publication of Lindsay’s The Monarche. Cf. C. Marie Harker, ‘John Knox and the Monstrous Regiment of Gender’, in Literature, Letters and the Canonical in Early Modern Scotland, ed. by Theo van Heijnsbergen and Nicola Royan (East Linton: Tuckwell, 2002), pp. 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carolyn ives and David Parkinson, ‘Scottish Chaucer, Misogynist Chaucer’ in Rewriting Chaucer: Culture, Authority, and the Idea of the Authentic Text, 14001602, ed. by Thomas A. Prendergast and Barbara Kline (Columbus OH: Ohio State UP, 1999), p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lyall, p.182n, 1. 540: ‘Batye tout’ has puzzled previous editors: McDiarmid suggests that ‘batty’ means ‘plump’ and ‘towt’ a drink, but these senses are not attested before the nineteenth and eighteenth centuries respectively. Nevertheless, this is a more probable meaning than Hamer’s desperate ‘? a drinking cup’.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hamer, p. 193n, I. 1376. See Richard Rastall, ‘Female Roles in All-Male Casts’, Medieval English Theatre 7:1 (1985), 25–50. Rastall points out that prepubertal male actors could well have been in their late teens, due to a later onset of puberty, but also notes the likelihood that the roles of older women were most often played by postpubertal actors in medieval theatre. Cf Meagher, Shakespeare’s Shakespeare.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dunbar, William Dunbar: Poems, ed. by James Kinsley (Oxford: Clarendon, 1958), p. 33, 11. 122–3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sarah Carpenter, ‘Early Scottish Drama’, in The History of Scottish Literature, Vol. 1: Origins to 1660 (Mediaeval and Renaissance) (Aberdeen: AUP, 1988), p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dunbar, Nixt that a turnament wes tryid’, p. 56, 11. 94, 98–9. This particular poem is followed in Kinsley’s edition by ‘[a]n ironical “amendis maid be him to the telyouris and sowtaris”’ (p. 123n, quoting the Bannatyne MS), in which Dunbar praises these craftsmen for their ability to cover up physical deformity, concluding ‘Thocht ye be knavis in this cuntre: /Telyouris and sowtaris, blist be ye’ (Il. 39–40).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Glenn Burger, ‘Kissing the Pardoner’, PMLA, 107 (1992), pp. 1146–7. For Burger, the kiss between Chaucer’s Pardoner and Host ‘aligns the Pardoner and his audience in ways that envelop and fold together the very categories and boundaries with which that audience has been seeking to define and distance him’ (p. 1146), precisely because the just-maligned perversity of the Pardoner is effectively and subversively embraced rather than rejected. Lindsay instead allows his audience to distance themselves not only from the Pardoner but also, more importantly, from the Sowtar and his (former) wife.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Epp, G.P.J. (2004). Chastity in the Stocks: Women, Sex, and Marriage in Ane Satyre of the Thrie Estaitis . In: Dunnigan, S.M., Harker, C.M., Newlyn, E.S. (eds) Woman and the Feminine in Medieval and Early Modern Scottish Writing. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502208_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics