Harm Principle, Offence Principle, and Hate Speech
- 321 Downloads
The aim of this chapter is to confront the ethical question of the constraints of speech. Focus is put on the harm or the offence caused by the speech in question: can we say that sometimes the harm or the offence brought about by a certain speech constitutes such an injury that it cannot be tolerated? More specifically, under what conditions can preventing offence provide adequate reason for limiting freedom of expression?
KeywordsFree Speech Physical Harm Harmful Action Hate Speech Harm Principle
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- R. M. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977), pp. 266–78; ‘Liberalism’, in A Matter of Principle (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985), pp. 181–204.Google Scholar
- J. S. Mill, On Liberty (London: Dent, Everyman’s Edition, 1948), p. 114.Google Scholar
- Z. Chafee, Free Speech in the U.S. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1946), p. 397.Google Scholar
- Joel Feinberg, Offence to Others (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
- T. M. Scanlon, ‘Freedom of Expression and Categories of Expression’, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 40 (1979), p. 527.Google Scholar
- Donald Vandeveer, ‘Coercive Restraint of Offensive Actions’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol. 8 (1979), p. 177.Google Scholar
- Robert C. Carson, James N. Butcher and Susan Mineka, Abnormal Psychology and Modern Life (New York: HarperCollins, 1996).Google Scholar
- R. Cohen-Almagor, The Boundaries of Liberty and Tolerance (Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, 1994), chap. 12.Google Scholar
- Herbert McClosky and Alida Brill, Dimensions of Tolerance (New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 1983).Google Scholar