Abstract
At the 1867 annual meeting of the Female Medical Society the American doctor Mary Walker was invited to speak.1 In the face of much controversy, Walker was touring England, lecturing as much on dress reform and bloomerism as on women’s medical practice. This tour came on top of shocking reports about Dr James Barry, the eminent British army surgeon and lifelong cross-dresser, who was discovered to be a woman on her death.2 Such incidents in the 1860s added fuel to shrill pronouncements about the unsexing of women which medical education would entail, descriptions of them, for example, as curiosities which the public would wonder at, ‘just as it wonders at dancing dogs, fat boys, and bearded ladies’.3 In the feminist Victoria Magazine, editor Emily Faithfull worked hard to undo what she saw as the damage of Mary Walker’s lecture tour to the cause of women’s medical practice. The respectable figures of Elizabeth Garrett and Elizabeth Blackwell, as symbols of the new movement, were hurriedly re-inscribed with feminine meanings. Faithfull described Mary Walker as
such an unfortunate contrast to ladies like Miss Blackwell and Miss Garrett, whose scientific knowledge and medical skill are only equalled by their modesty and quietness of demeanour‖a woman may be a doctor, and yet retain the modesty, purity, and grace, which are her special characteristics.4
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
For recent accounts of James Barry’s career, see M. Garber, Vested Interests: Cross-Dressing and Cultural Anxiety, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1992, pp. 203–5;
C. Blake, The Charge of the Parasols: Women’s Entry to the Medical Profession, Women’s Press, London, 1990, pp. 89–90.
E. Blackwell, ‘Letter to Young Ladies Desirous of Studying Medicine’ (1860) reprinted in C. A. Lacey (ed.), Barbara Leigh Smith Bodichon and the Langham Place Group, p. 457.
Elizabeth Blackwell to Barbara Bodichon, 30 December 1860, reprinted in T. P. Fleming, ‘Dr Elizabeth Blackwell on Florence Nightingale’, Columbia University Columns, 6, 1956, p. 43.
M. Scharlieb, Reminiscences, Williams & Norgate, London, 1924, p. 29; For further analysis of British medical women in India, see
K. Jayawar-dena, The White Woman’s Other Burden: Western Women and South Asia During British Rule, Routledge, New York and London, 1995, pp. 75–90;
A. Burton, Burdens of History: British Feminists, Indian Women, and Imperial Culture, 1865–1915, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill and London, 1994, pp. 112–24.
E. Blackwell, ‘Medicine as a Profession for Women’ (1862) in C. A. Lacey (ed.), Barbara Leigh Smith Bodichon and the Langham Place Group, p. 412.
R. Morantz-Sanchez, Sympathy and Science: Women Physicians in American Medicine, Oxford University Press, New York and London, 1985, pp. 185 ff;
R. Morantz-Sanchez, ‘Feminist Theory and Historical Practice: Rereading Elizabeth Blackwell’ in A. Shapiro (ed.), Feminists’ Revision History, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick & New Jersey, 1994, pp. 95–119.
For commentary on this historiography, see B. Caine, Victorian Feminists, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992, pp. 2–17;
L. Davidoff, ‘Regarding Some “Old Husbands” Tales’: Public and Private in Feminist History’ in Worlds Between: Historical Perspectives on Gender and Class, Polity, Cambridge, 1995, pp. 227–76.
D. Haraway, Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science, Verso, London and New York, 1992, p. 54.
See for example, C. Merchant, Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution, HarperCollins, New York, 1990;
V. Plumwood, The Mastery of Nature, Routledge, London and New York, 1993.
J. Comaroff, ‘Medicine: Symbol and Ideology’ in P. Wright and A. Treacher (eds), The Problem of Medical Knowledge, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 1982, pp. 56–7.
F. P. Cobbe, ‘The Medical Profession and its Morality’, Modem Review, 2, 1881, p. 309.
F. P. Cobbe, ‘Hygeiolatry’ in her Peak of Darien, Williams and Norgate, London, 1882, p. 86, p. 89.
For elaborations of the idea of the place of purity and morality in early feminism, see M. Vicinus, Independent Women, pp. 17–18; S. Jeffreys, The Spinster and her Enemies: Feminism and Sexuality, 1880–1930, Pandora, London and Boston, 1985;
E. Blackwell, Christianity in Medicine, J.F. Nock, London, 1890, p. 2.
Elizabeth Blackwell to Florence Nightingale, 25 July no year, BL Add. MSS 45,802, f. 237; See also, E. Blackwell, Pioneer Work for Women, J. M. Dent, London, 1914, p. 199.
L. Martindale, The Woman Doctor and her Future, Mills & Boon, London, 1922, p. 133. For further discussion of women doctors’ involvement in feminism and eugenics in the early twentieth century, see
A. Bashford, ‘Edwardian Feminists and the Venereal Disease Debate in England’ in B. Caine (ed.), The Woman Question in England and Australia, University Printing Service, University of Sydney, 1994, pp. 58–85; L. Bland, Banishing the Beast, pp. 222–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Alison Bashford
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bashford, A. (1998). Feminising Medicine: The Gendered Politics of Health. In: Purity and Pollution. Studies in Gender History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501249_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501249_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-77796-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50124-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)