Skip to main content

The Twenty-First-Century University: Dilemmas of Leadership and Organizational Futures

  • Chapter
The Global University

Part of the book series: Historical Studies in Education ((HSE))

Abstract

Conceptions of the purposes of universities have been a source of debate for many centuries, but in the twenty-first century, the worldwide expansion of higher-education systems, the pressures of globalization, the growing competition to attract overseas students, the rise of international rankings and league tables, and pressures on both public and private funding of universities have led to fresh questioning about what purposes universities should serve—and how universities should be funded. Questions about whether universities should be part of the public or the private sector have also fed into this debate, as higher-education institutions have increasingly been permeated by markets (markets for students, for scholars, and for knowledge). Meanwhile, universities’ traditional missions of teaching and research have been joined by new requirements for entrepreneurial and public-engagement activities. This chapter explores the ways in which current debates about the purposes of universities have informed the practices, values, development, and dilemmas of higher-education leaders and their senior teams. It will also consider the ways in which new conceptions of the purposes of universities could lead to reshaping the future organizational structures and cultures of higher-education institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Archer, L. (2007). “Diversity, Equality and Higher Education: A Critical Reflection on the Ab/uses of Equity Discourse within Widening Participation.” Teaching in Higher Education 12(5): 635–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge, V. J. (1970). “Images of the Future and Organizational Change: The Case of New York University.” Retrieved December 2009, from http://www.eric.ed.gov:80/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/38/43/e7.pdf

  • Barnett, R. (1999). Realizing the University in an Age of Supercomplexity. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. and P. Trowler (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Milton Keynes: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beerkens, E. (2004). Global Opportunities and Institutional Embeddedness. Higher Education Consortia in Europe and Southeast Asia. Enschede, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E. M. (1995). “Total Quality Management in the Academy: A Rebellious Reading.” Harvard Educational Review (4, Winter): 593–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (2004). Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., G. Petrov, and J. Gosling (2008). “Developing Collective Leadership in Higher Education.” London, Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. Retrieved January 2010, from https://www.lfhe.ac.U.K./protected_login_form.html?item=bolden.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, G. and C. Lucas. (2008). “What Are Universities For?” Retrieved November 2008, from http://www.leru.org/icGFnZT00.

  • Breakwell, G. and M. Y. Tytherleigh (2008). “The Characteristics, Roles and Selection of Vice Chancellors—Final Report.” London, Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. Retrieved January 2010, from https://www.lfhe.ac.U.K/protected_login_form.html?item=breakwellreport.pdf

  • Brew, A. (2006). Research and Teaching: Beyond the Divide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2007). “Effective Leadership in Higher Education.” London, Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. Retrieved January 2010, from https://www.lfhe.ac.U.K/protected/brymanfinal.pdf

  • Burgoyne, J., S. Williams, and J. Mackness (2009). “Baseline Study of Leadership Development in Higher Education.” London. Retrieved January 2010, from https://www.lfhe.ac.U.K./protected_login_form.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. 1, The Rise of the Network Society. Maiden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, M. (2009). Changing Academics: Quality Audit and Its Perceived Impact. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciancanelli, P. (2007). “Re/producing Universities: Knowledge Dissemination, Market Power and the Global Knowledge Commons.” Geographies of Knowledge, Geometries of Power: Framing the Future of Higher Education in the 21st Century; World Year Hook of Education 2008. Ed. D. Epstein, R. Boden, R. Deem, F. Rizvi, and S. Wright. New York: Routledge Falmer: 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. New York and Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. and J. Newman (1997). The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., J. G. March, and J. P. Olsen (1988). “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Decisions and Organizations. Ed. J. G. March. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G. and M. Oliver, Eds. (2007). Contemporary Perspectives in E-learning Research: Themes, Methods and Impact on Practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2001). “Globalization, New Managerialism, Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurialism in Universities; Is the Local Dimension Still Important?” Comparative Education 37(1): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2003). “Managing to Exclude? Manager-Academic and Staff Communities in Contemporary U.K. Universities.” International Perspectives on Higher Education Research: Access and Inclusion. Ed. M. Tight. Amsterdam. London: Elsevier Science JAI: 103–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2007a). “Managing a Meritocracy or an Equitable Organization? Senior Managers’ and Employees’ Views about Equal Opportunities Policies in U.K. Universities.” Journal of Education Policy 22(6): 615–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2007b). “The Knowledge Worker in the Divided University.” Knowledge, Higher Education and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of U.K. Universities. Ed. R. Deem, S. Hillyard, and M. Reed. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 67–100.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • —. (2008). “Producing and Re/producing the European University in the 21st Century: Research Perspectives on the Shifting Purposes of Higher Education.” Higher Education Policy 21(4): 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2009). “Leading and Managing Contemporary U.K. Universities: Do Excellence and Meritocracy Still Prevail over Diversity?” Higher Education Policy 29(1): 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2010). “Herding the Academic Cats: The Challenges of ‘Managing’ Academic Research in the Contemporary U.K. University.” Perspectives 14(2): 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. and K. J. Brehony (2005). “Management as Ideology: The Case of ‘New Managerialism’ in Higher Education.” Oxford Review of Education 31(2): 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. and L. Lucas (2006). “Learning about Research: Exploring the Learning & Teaching/Research Relationship amongst Educational Practitioners Studying in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 11(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. and L. Morley (2006). “Diversity in the Academy? Staff and Senior Manager Perceptions of Equality Policies in Six Contemporary U.K. Higher-Education Institutions.” Policy Futures 4(2): 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. and R. N. Johnson (2003) “Risking the University? Learning to Be a Manager-Academic in U.K. Universities.” Sociological Research on Line 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., K. H. Mok, and L. Lucas (2008). “Transforming Higher Education in Whose Image? Exploring the Concept of the ‘World-Class’ University in Europe and Asia.” Higher Education Policy 21(1): 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., L. Lucas, and K. H. Mok (2009). “The ‘World-Class’ University in Europe and East Asia: Dynamics and Consequences of Global Higher Education Reform.” University Rankings, Diversity, and the New Landscape of Higher Education. Ed. B. Stensaker and B. Kehm. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., L. Morley, and A. Tlili (2005). “Negotiating Equity in HEIs: A Case-Study Analysis of Policies and Staff Experiences.” Retrieved May 2005, from http://www.hefce.ac.U.K./pubs/rdreports/2005 /rd10_05/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., S. Hillyard, and M. Reed (2007). Knowledge, Higher Education and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of U.K. Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., O. Fulton, R. Johnson, S. Hillyard, M. Reed et al. (2001). “New Managerialism and the Management of U.K. Universities.” End of Award Report. Swindon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G. (2001). Challenging Knowledge: The University in the Knowledge Society. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimaggio, P. (2001). The Twenty First Century Firm. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell, Eds. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. (2009). “Global University Rankings and the Academic Reputation Race.” Global Rankings and League Tables in Higher Education: Promising, Perilous or Perverse. Bath. SRHE South West Higher Education Research Network. Retrieved November 13, from http://www.srhe.ac.U.K./downloads/swrn-l31109a.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, D., R. Boden, R. Deem, F. Rizvi, and S. Wright, Eds. (2007). Geographies of Knowledge, Geometries of Power: Framing the Future of Higher Education in the 21st Century; World Year Hook of Education 2008. New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exworthy, M. and S. Halford, Eds. (1999). Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2000). “Rethinking Recognition.” New Left Review (3, May-June): 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. and A. Honneth (1998). Redistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2007). “University Leadership in the Twenty-First Century: The Case For Academic Caesarism.” Geographies of Knowledge, Geometries of Power: Framing the Future of Higher Education in the 21st Century; World Year Hook of Education 2008. Ed. D. Epstein, R. Boden, R. Deem, F. Rizvi, and S. Wright. New York: Routledge Falmer: 50–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson, and R. Garrison (2003). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, D. and A. Hannan (2007). “Responses to a Policy Initiative: The Case of Centers for Excellence in Teaching and Learning.” Studies in Higher Education 32(5): 633–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P. (2000). “Academic Restructuring: Organizational Change and Institutional Imperatives.” Higher Education 39(1): 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, A. and H. Silver (2000). Innovating in Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. and K. Harman (2003). “Institutional Mergers in Higher Education: Lessons from International Experience.” Tertiary Education and Management 9(1): 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2007). The Governance of Education in Neo-liberal Times. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. and H. W. Marsh (1996). “The Relationship between Research and Teaching: A Meta-analysis.” Review of Educational Research 66: 507–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2009) “Rankings and the Battle for World-Class Excellence: Institutional Strategies and Policy Choices.” Higher Education Management and Policy 21(1): 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2011). Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World-Class Excellence. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2000). Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, Q. and G. Nowell-Smith, Eds. (1971). Antonio Gramsci: Selections from Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A., M. Healey, and R. Zetter. (2007). “Linking Teaching and Research in Disciplines and Departments.” Retrieved April 2008, from http://www.heacademy.ac.U.K./assets/York/documents/Linking TeachingAndResearch_April07.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A., T Blackman, R. Lindsay, and R. Paton-Saltzberg (1998). “Teaching and Research: Student Perspectives and Policy Implications.” Studies in Higher Education 23(2): 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. and R. Deem (2003). “Talking of Students: Tensions and Contradictions for the Manager-Academic and the University in Contemporary Higher Education.” Higher Education 46(3): 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2007). Can Provincial Universities Be Global Institutions? Rethinking the Institution as the Unit of Analysis in the Study of Globalization and Higher Education? Unpublished paper presented to the “Critical Perspective on Realizing the Global University,” Worldwide University Network Conference, November 14, Thistle Hotel, Marble Arch, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenoy, T. and M. Reed (2008). “Managing Modernization: Introducing Performance Management in British Universities.” European Universities in Transition: Issues, Models and Cases. Ed. C. Mazza, P. Quattrone, and A. Riccaboni. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar: 188–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. and U. Lanzendorf, Eds. (2006). Reforming University Governance: Changing Conditions for Research in Four European Countries. Bonn: Lemmens/Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. (2009). Governing Universities Globally: Organizations, Regulation and Rankings. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek, M. (2003). “The Social Functions of the University in the Context of the Changing State/Market Relations.” Globalization and Competition in Higher Education. Ed. J. de Groofe and G. Lauwers. Antwerp: Wolf Legal.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2005). “The University and the State in a Global Age: Renegotiating the Traditional Social Contract?” European Educational Research Journal 4(4): 324–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2006). The University and the State. Frankfurt and New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2007). “The University and the Welfare State in Transition: Changing Public Services in a Wider Context.” Geographies of Knowledge, Geometries of Power: Framing the Future of Higher Education in the 21st Century; World Tear Book of Education 2008. Ed. D. Epstein, R. Boden, R. Deem, F. Rizvi, and S. Wright. New York: Routledge Falmer: 32–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, S. (2009). “Why University Public Engagement?” Retrieved January 2010, from http://www.publicengagement.ac.U.K./what-public-engagement/stuart-laing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisyte, L., H. F. de Boer, and J. Enders (2006). “England: The Prototype of the ‘Evaluative State.’” Reforming University Governance: Changing Conditions for Research in Four European Countries. Ed. B. Kehm and U. Lanzendorf. Bonn: Lemmens: 21–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, L. (2006). The Research Game in Academic Life. Maidenhead: Open University Press and the Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, L. and N. Turner. (2007). “Early Career Academics and Their Experiences of Linking Research and Teaching: A Collaborative U.K./Canadian Project.” Retrieved June 2008, from http://escalate.ac.U.K./4061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuel, A. (2008). “From Old Boys Network to Virtual Network: A Study of Internet Technology Use amongst U.K. Academics, and the Extent to which It Is Disrupting the Gendered Academic Research Culture. Graduate School of Education. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol. Unpublished PhD thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1989). Discovering Institutions. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2007). “The Public/Private Divide in Higher Education: A Global Revision.” Higher Education 53(3): 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. and G. Rhoades (2002). “Beyond National States, Markets and Systems of Higher Education: A Glonacal Agency Heuristic.” Higher Education 43(3): 282–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. and M. Considine (2000). Enterprise University in Australia. Governance, Strategy and Reinvention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S., Ed. (2007). Strategic Leadership of Change in Higher Education: What’s New? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. and J. Wajcman (2004). “Markets, Contingency and Preferences: Contemporary Managers’ Narrative Identities.” Sociological Review 52(2): 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. and B. Rowan (1977). “Institutionalised Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R. (1993). Leading Academics. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberly, W. (1949). The Crisis in the University. London: SCM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R. (2003). “Repositioning Higher Education as a Global Commodity: Opportunities and Challenges for Future Sociology of Education Work.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 24(2): 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2004). “Commodifying Learning: Pitfalls and Possibilities.” Reflections on Higher Education 13: 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R. and I. Jamieson (2005). “Empowering Participants or Corroding Learning? Towards a Research Agenda on the Impact of Student Consumerism in Higher Education.” Journal of Education Policy 20(3): 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2003). “The Bologna Declaration: Some of the Historic Dilemmas Posed by the Reconstruction of the Community in Europe’s Systems of Higher Education.” Educational Policy 17(1): 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedeva, M. (2007). “New Tricks and Old Dogs? The ‘Third Mission’ and the Re-production of the University.” Geographies of Knowledge, Geometries of Power: Framing the Future of Higher Education in the 21st Century; World Year Hook of Education 2008. Ed. D. Epstein, R. Boden, R. Deem, F. Rizvi, and S. Wright. New York: Routledge Falmer: 85–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. H. (1852). The Idea of the University. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyborg, P. (2003). “Higher Education as a Public Good and a Public Responsibility.” Higher Education in Europe 28(3): 355–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2006). “Four Future Scenarios for Higher Education.” Paris. Retrieved January 2010, from http://www.oecd.org/document/8/0,3343,en_2649_S35845581_37031944_l_l_l_l,00.html.

  • Palfreyman, D. and T. Tapper, Eds. (2009). Structuring Mass Higher Education: The Role of Elite Institutions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. (2007). “Reimagining the University in the Global Era.” Retrieved September 2007, from http://recordings.wun.ac.U.K./id /2007/id20070525/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Readings, B. (1996). The University in Ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. and C. H. Bond (2005). “The Research-Teaching Relation—A View from the Edge.” Higher Education 50(3): 509–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmi, J. (2009). The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities. Washington: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sastry, T. and B. Bekhradnia (2006). Using Metrics to Allocate Research Funds. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, M. (2008). Learning Spaces: Creating Opportunities for Knowledge Creation in Academic Life. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scase, R. and R. Goffee (1989). Reluctant Managers: Their Work and Lifestyles. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. and J. Brennan (2000). “Quality Assessment and Institutional Change: Experiences from 14 Countries.” Higher Education 40(3): 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. L. (2006). Managing Good Governance in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. and G. Leslie (1997). Academic Capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2001). “Expanding and Elaborating the Concept of Academic Capitalism.” Organization 8(2): 154–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sporn, B. (1996). “Managing University Culture: An Analysis of the Relationship between Institutional Culture and Management Approaches.” Higher Education 32: 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1999). Adaptive University Structures: An Analysis of Adaptation to Socio-economic Environments of US and European Universities. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B. and B. Kehm, Eds. (2009). University Rankings, Diversity, and the New Landscape of Higher Education. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (2000). Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2006). ““Big Is Beautiful.” Organizational Change in Universities in the United Kingdom: New Models of Institutional Management and the Changing Role of Academic Staff.” Higher Education in Europe 31(3): 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (2009). “Benchmarking Higher Education Internal Communications and the Development of Best Practice Standards, to Enhance Institutional Effectiveness, Leadership, Management, and Staff Relations.” Bristol, Higher Education Funding Council. Retrieved January 2010, from http://www.hefce.ac.U.K./lgm/build/lgmfund/projects/show.asp?id=136&cat=11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trainor, R. (2010). “Review of R Zemsky’s Making Reform Work: The Case for Transforming American Higher Education.” Times Higher Education (January 14–20): 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Humboldt, W. (1970). “University Reform in Germany: Reports and Documents: Reprint of ‘On the Spirit and the Organizational Framework of Intellectual Institutions in Berlin.’” Minerva 8: 242–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Tunzelmann, N. and E. K. Mbula (2003). “Changes in Research Assessment Practices in Other Countries since 1999: Final Report.” Bristol. Retrieved March 2008, from http://www.ra-review.ac.U.K./reports/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M., R. Deem, J. Morrison, and M. Reed (2009). “Developing Organization Leaders as Change Agents in the Public Services.” End of Award Report. Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2007). “China’s Higher Education on a Overpass of 4 Fold Enrollment Expansion.” Retrieved September 2007, from http://recordings.wun.ac.U.K./id/2007/id20070430/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, I. (2007). “The University of Paris in the Thirteenth Century and the Institutionalization of Scholarly Ideals.” Retrieved January 2010, from http://recordings.wun.ac.U.K./id/2007/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, P. (2005). “Impact of Bibliometrics upon the Science System: Inadvertent Consequences?” Scientometrics 62(1): 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2008). “Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space.” Higher Education Quarterly 62(4): 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2009). “The Rise of the Blended Professional in Higher Education: A Comparison between the U.K., Australia and the United States.” Higher Education 59(3): 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, R. (2009). Making Reform Work: The Case for Transforming American Higher Education. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Adam R. Nelson Ian P. Wei

Copyright information

© 2012 Adam R. Nelson and Ian P. Wei

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deem, R. (2012). The Twenty-First-Century University: Dilemmas of Leadership and Organizational Futures. In: Nelson, A.R., Wei, I.P. (eds) The Global University. Historical Studies in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230392465_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics