Abstract
Vicesimus Knox, an eloquent commentator on, among other things, eighteenth-century letters and the Rowley Controversy, found considerable entertainment in the antiquarian scramble for scraps of old literature and the ensuing uncritical eulogies sung over ancient poetry in the later eighteenth century. He laid blame for this revolution in literary taste clearly, if discreetly, at the door of Thomas Percy and his Reliques of Ancient English Poetry, an anthology of ballads and songs first published in 1765.2 When Knox published his essays in 1782, Percy, a persistent social climber, had just been promoted from Dean of Carlisle to Bishop of Dromore and over the next 30 years of life in his corner of Ireland, would assiduously distance himself from his early antiquarian interests. But the influence of Percy’s Reliques remained palpable – not simply in the encouragement it offered to subsequent collectors of antique literature (including Walter Scott), but to the succeeding generation of Romantic poets (notably in Wordsworth and Coleridge’s Lyrical Ballads). And yet perhaps the most significant impact of the Reliques was on Thomas Chatterton.
He who venerates a contemptible relique is actuated with a degree of the pilgrim’s superstition, less pernicious indeed in its effects, but scarcely less absurd in its principle.
Vicesimus Knox, ‘Objections to the Study of Antiquities when Improperly Pursued’.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Knox, Vicesimus, Essays Moral and Literary (London, 1782), ii. 322.
Life, 56–7; Works, 1178–9; Taylor, 81, 86–7; Holmes, Richard, ‘Thomas Chatterton: The Case Re-Opened’, Cornhill Magazine 178 (1970), 218. Bertrand Bronson, however, argues that Elizabeth Cooper’s The Muses Library was more significant (‘Thomas Chatterton’, in Facets of the Enlightenment: Studies in English Literature and its Contexts (California, 1968), 187–209).
For my argument on Macpherson and Percy, see ‘Celts, Goths, and the Nature of the Literary Source’, in Alvaro Ribeiro, SJ, and James G. Basker (eds), Tradition in Transition: Women Writers, Marginal Texts, and the Eighteenth-Century Canon (Oxford, 1996), 274–96; and The Making of Percy’s Reliques (Oxford, 1999), ch. 3.
These were kept in a folder titled ‘Chatterton & Rowley MS. Adversaria &c. carefully to be preserved T[homas]. D[romore]’. They probably arrived in April 1773 (see below) (Clarke, Ernest, ‘New Lights on Chatterton’, Transactions of the Bibliographical Society 13 (1916), 230–6).
Bristol Reference Library [hereafter BRL], B11457, fos. 214–16; see also Bodl., MS Eng poet b6, fo. 46v. Lort was one of the first researchers into Chatterton and Rowley, and, by 1774, a friend of Percy’s (Davis, Bertram H., Thomas Percy: A Scholar-Cleric in the Age of Johnson, (Philadelphia, 1989), 207, 214). Percy’s bibliography is also important in its own right: it notes a lost Chatterton letter to Thomas Carey, 25 June 1770 (Works, 776).
Cradock, Joseph, Literary and Miscellaneous Memoirs (London, 1828), i. 207;
Johnson, Samuel, The Complete English Poems, ed. J. D. Fleeman (Yale, 1982), 128, 220n.
For example, there are two engravings of Warkworth Hermitage in Grose, Francis, The Antiquities of England and Wales (London, 1773 [1772] –87), iii (1776) (unpaged): one is a floor-plan, the other a picturesque projection with an account of the scene.
Chatterton, Thomas, The Execution of Sir Charles Bawdin, ed. Thomas Eagles (London, 1772), A1r.
The Yale Edition of the Correspondence of Horace Walpole, ed. W. S. Lewis et al. (New Haven, 1937–83), xxviii. 36.
Catcott’s accuracy has been confirmed by L. F. Powell, ‘Thomas Tyrwhitt and the Rowley Poems’, RES 7 (1931), 315n.
Fairer, David (ed.), The Correspondence of Thomas Warton (1728–90) (Athens, Ga., & London, 1995), 342.
Ibid. 211. This obviously caught the public imagination: the passage was copied into ‘MS Life of Thomas CHATFERTON, written in a small notebook by Orton SMITH’, ed. Georges Lamoine, Caliban 8 (1971), 26. The authenticity of Percy’s Hau Kiou Choaan (1761) has not been adequately established (see V. H. Ogburn, ‘The Wilkinson MSS. and Percy’s Chinese Books’, RES 9 (1933), 30–6).
In his dotage, Percy was tempted to change his mind after he received Southey and Cottle’s edition (see The Correspondence of Thomas Percy and Robert Anderson, ed. W. E. K. Anderson (New Haven, 1988), ix. 146).
Mickle, William Julius, The Prophecy of Queen Emma; An Ancient Ballad lately discovered Written by Johannes Turgotus, Prior of Durham, in the Reign of William Rufus (London, 1782), 21.
Greene, Edward, Strictures upon a Pamphlet intitled, Cursory Observations on the Poems attributed to Rowley, a Priest of the Fifteenth Century (London, 1782), 56.
Baynes, John, An Archeological Epistle to the Reverend and Worshipful Jeremiah Milles, D. D. Dean of Exeter, President of the Society of Antiquaries, and Editor of a Superb Edition of the Poems of Thomas Rowley, Priest (London, 1782), 13.
GM 51 (1781), 568. Richard Sher ignores the Rowley dimension in his article on Percy and Ferguson, ‘Percy, Shaw, and the Ferguson “Cheat”: National Prejudice in the Ossian Wars’, in Howard Gaskill (ed.), Ossian Revisited (Edinburgh, 1991), 207–45. See also Davis, 256–9.
Viscomi, Joseph, Blake and the Idea of the Book (Princeton, 1993), 187–97.
Warton, Thomas, The History of English Poetry, from the Close of the Eleventh to the Commencement of the Eighteenth Century, ed. David Fairer (London & Bristol, 1997), ii. 463. The passage is strikingly reminiscent of Percy’s conclusion to Northern Antiquities (London, 1770), i. 394, and Richard Hurd’s Letters on Chivalry and Romance (London, 1762), 119.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Nick Groom
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Groom, N. (1999). Fragments, Reliques, & MSS: Chatterton and Percy. In: Groom, N. (eds) Thomas Chatterton and Romantic Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390225_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390225_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40581-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-39022-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)