Freud i: From Biology to Psychology

  • Roger Horrocks


It is astonishing how tenacious Christian attitudes to sex have been in Western culture. They still surround us, and no doubt exist in all of us, at least in an unconscious form. But over the last five hundred years or more, changes have occurred in society and in human thought that began the slow disruption, and eventually perhaps the disintegration, of the dominant Christian world-view.


Child Sexual Abuse Sexual Desire Human Sexuality Sexual Drive External Reality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M.J. Sirks and C. Zirkle, The Evolution of Biology (New York: The Ronald Press, 1964), pp. 121–5 and 149–53.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    S. Freud, Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, in On Sexuality (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979), pp. 56–7 n.Google Scholar
  3. 8.
    See the discussion in Louis Breger, Freud’s Unfinished Journey (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981), chapter 2, ‘Psychoanalysis is not a science’.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    S. Freud, An Outline of Psycho-analysis, in Historical and Expository Works on Psychoanalysis (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1993), p. 385.Google Scholar
  5. 13.
    Jeffrey Masson (ed.), The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud and Wilhelm Fliess 1887–1904 (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, 1985), p. 2.Google Scholar
  6. 14.
    For a commentary on the Freud/Fliess relationship see Masud R. Khan, ‘Montaigne, Rousseau and Freud’, in Privacy of the Self (London: Hogarth, 1986), pp. 99–111.Google Scholar
  7. 21.
    For a negative view of this episode, see Jeffrey Masson, The Assault on Truth: Freud and Child Sexual Abuse (London: Fontana, 1992), chapter 3; a more circumspect view can be found inGoogle Scholar
  8. Lisa Appignanesi and John Forrester, Freud’s Women (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1992), pp. 119–20 and 134–41.Google Scholar
  9. 24.
    For a chilling example, see Jeffrey Masson, Final Analysis: The Making and Unmaking of a Psychoanalyst (London: Fontana, 1992), pp. 189–90.Google Scholar
  10. 28.
    Juliet Mitchell, Psychoanalysis and Feminism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990), pp. 352–4.Google Scholar
  11. 31.
    For a critical view, see Jacqueline Rose, ‘Dora: Fragment of an analysis’ in Sexuality in the Field of Vision (London: Verso, 1986), pp. 27–47; also L. Appignanesi and J. Forrester, Freud’s Women, pp. 146–67; the original case-study isGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Freud, ‘Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria (Dora)’, in Case Histories I (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991).Google Scholar
  13. 32.
    Lou Andreas-Salomé, The Freud Journal (London: Quartet, 1987), pp. 91–2.Google Scholar
  14. 33.
    See J.R. Greenberg and S.A. Mitchell, Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983), pp. 119–50.Google Scholar
  15. 35.
    See Eric H. Lenneberg, Biological Foundations of Language (New York: John Wiley, 1967).Google Scholar
  16. 36.
    See H. Solomon, ‘The transcendent function and Hegel’s dialectical vision’, Journal of Analytical Psychology 39: 1 (1994), pp. 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 39.
    Jeffrey Weeks, Sexuality and its Discontents: Meanings, Myths and Modern Sexualities (London and New York: Routledge, 1985), p. 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 40.
    Maria Torok, ‘The significance of penis envy in women’, in J. Chasse-guet-Smirgel (ed.), Female Sexuality: New Psychoanalytic Views (London: Maresfield, 1988), p. 159.Google Scholar
  19. 41.
    See Kenneth Lewes, The Psychoanalytic Theory of Male Homosexuality (London: Quartet, 1988).Google Scholar
  20. 43.
    R.D. Laing, Self and Others (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971), p. 32.Google Scholar
  21. 46.
    S. Freud, Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991), p. 453.Google Scholar
  22. 48.
    See, for example, S. Freud, Civilization and its Discontents, in Civilization, Society and Religion (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991), p. 296.Google Scholar
  23. 49.
    Jacqueline Rose, ‘Femininity and its discontents’, in Sexuality: A Reader, ed. Feminist Review (London: Virago, 1988), p. 97.Google Scholar
  24. 50.
    J. Mitchell, Psychoanalysis and Feminism, p. 354. Mitchell’s reference to ‘Millett’ denotes Kate Milieu, Sexual Politics (New York: Doubleday, 1970).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Roger Horrocks 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Horrocks

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations