Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Managing Legacy

  • Chapter
Managing the Olympics

Abstract

This chapter will review legacy-management processes that have emerged in the last decade and comment on their effectiveness. Because legacy-management processes are still evolving and there remain gaps, loose ends and shortcomings in protocols and procedures, it will be argued that legacy management is still evolving. Indeed, it is a more difficult exercise than the management of the Games as an event. The following issues will be considered:

  • The diffuse character and variety of legacy objectives;

  • The problem of legacy assessment and its time frame;

  • Legacy governance;

  • The monitoring of legacy by an Olympic city and the IOC;

  • The policing of legacy;

  • Research into legacy management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cashman, R. (2006). The Bitter-Sweet Awakening: The Legacy of the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. Sydney: Walla Walla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashman, R. (2011). Sydney Olympic Park 2000 to 2010: History and Legacy. Sydney: Walla Walla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, L. (2012). Beyond the Games: Regeneration Legacies and London 2012. Leisure Studies, 31 (3) p. xx.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denwood, A. (2011). ‘London 2012: Olympic Games legacy promises under fire’, ‘File on 4’, BBC Radio, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15490995 [Accessed 5 March 2012 ].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. (2010). ‘Living in the Olympic Park: Will dreams become reality?’ 6 December, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11842550 [Accessed 5 March 2012].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. (2011). ‘Lessons for a Lasting Legacy: Olympic Ambitions’, The 2011 SURF Annual Lecture, Dundee City Chambers, Dundee, 1 December, http://www.scotregen.co.uk/pdf.pl?file=surf/news/2011_SURF_Annual_Lecture_Transcript.pdf [Accessed 2 March 2012].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, J. (2008). The Austerity Olympics: When the Games came to London in 1948. London: Aurum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, J. and Whannel, G. (2012). Understanding the Olympics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, K. (2012). Sport Mega-Events and a Legacy of Increased Sport Participation: An Olympic Promise or An Olympic Dream? A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Leeds: Leeds Metropolitan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ieromonachou, P., Warren, J. and Potter, S. (2010). ‘The Olympic Transport Legacy’, Town and Country Planning, July/August pp. 331–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Olympic Committee (2011). The Guide on Olympic Legacy, 2nd edn (IOC website).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowell, T. (2011). ‘Afterword’, in B. Goff and M. Simpson eds, Thinking the Olympics: The Classical Tradition and the Modern Games. London: Bristol Classical Press, p. 204.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacAloon, J. J. (2008). ‘“Legacy” as Managerial/Magical Discourse in Contemporary Olympic Affairs’, International Journal of the History of Sport, 25 (14), pp. 2060–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miah, A. and Garcia, B. (2012). The Olympics: The Basics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polley, M. (2011). The British Olympics. London: English Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirai, H. (2008). ‘Planning London Olympic Park as a Global and Local Place–A Comparative Analysis with Sydney Olympic Park’, in A. Hay and R. Cashman eds, Connecting Cities: Mega-Event Cities, Sydney: SOPA, pp. 63–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydney 2000 Olympic Bid Limited (1991). Share the Spirit [Sydney Bid Books] Sydney, Volumes 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of East London/Thames Gateway Institute for Sustainability (2010) Olympic Games Impact Study—London 2012 Pre-Games Report, October 2010, Economic and Social Research Council, available from: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/impacts-and-findings/features-casestudies/features/15278/early-impacts-for-london-2012-games.aspx [Accessed 5 March 2012].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Richard Cashman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Horne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

    Stephen Frawley  & Daryl Adair  & 

Copyright information

© 2013 Richard Cashman and John Horne

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cashman, R., Horne, J. (2013). Managing Legacy. In: Frawley, S., Adair, D. (eds) Managing the Olympics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230389588_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation